Results of Evaluation Process Sample Clauses

Results of Evaluation Process. At the conclusion of the process, the Chair will provide a written performance evaluation that includes the determination of either satisfactory or unsatisfactory performance. Within ten (10) business days of the meeting, the Bargaining Unit Faculty member may write a response to the evaluation. Copies of both the Chair’s evaluation results and the Bargaining Unit Faculty member’s response to it will be placed in the Bargaining Unit Faculty member’s departmental or School file. If the Bargaining Unit Faculty member receives an evaluation of unsatisfactory, the Chair will provide the Bargaining Unit Faculty member with a performance improvement plan (PIP) that is objective, achievable and measurable (and the information, time and tools for ensuring the improvements are possible to make) before re-evaluation, which will be scheduled for the end of the PIP. Evaluations are not subject to the Grievance and Arbitration procedure.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Results of Evaluation Process. Within ten (10) business days of receiving the written performance evaluation, the Adjunct Faculty member may write a response to the evaluation. Copies of both the Chair or their designee’s evaluation and the Adjunct Faculty member’s response to it will be placed in the Adjunct Faculty member’s departmental or School file. If the Adjunct Faculty member receives an evaluation of unsatisfactory, the Chair or designee will provide the Adjunct Faculty member with a performance improvement plan (PIP) that is objective, achievable and measurable (and the information, time and tools for ensuring the improvements are possible to make) before re-evaluation, which will be scheduled for the end of the PIP. Evaluations are not subject to the Grievance and Arbitration procedure.
Sample 1
Results of Evaluation Process. 1. At the conclusion of the process, the Chair or qualified designee will provide a written performance evaluation that includes the determination of either satisfactory or unsatisfactory performance.
Sample 1
Results of Evaluation Process. Within ten (10) business days of the meeting, the Adjunct Faculty member (unit employee) may write a response to the evaluation. Copies of both the Chair’s evaluation and the Adjunct Faculty member’s (unit employee’s) response to it will be placed in the Adjunct Faculty member’s (unit employee’s) departmental or School file. If the Adjunct Faculty member (unit employee) receives an evaluation of unsatisfactory, the Chair will provide the Adjunct Faculty member (unit employee) with a performance improvement plan (PIP) that is objective, achievable and measurable (and the information, time and tools for ensuring the improvements are possible to make) before re-evaluation, which will be scheduled for the end of the PIP. Evaluations are not subject to the Grievance and Arbitration procedure.
Sample 1

Related to Results of Evaluation Process

  • Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used:

  • Project Monitoring Reporting Evaluation A. The Project Implementing Entity shall monitor and evaluate the progress of its activities under the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.08(b) of the General Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the Bank. Each such report shall cover the period of one

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • Benchmarking Report For the purposes of this Framework Schedule 12 “

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The goal of this task is to collect operational data from the project, to analyze that data for economic and environmental impacts, and to include the data and analysis in the Final Report. Formulas will be provided for calculations. A Final Report data collection template will be provided by the Energy Commission. The Recipient shall: • Develop data collection test plan. • Troubleshoot any issues identified. • Collect data, information, and analysis and develop a Final Report which includes: o Total gross project costs. o Length of time from award of bus(es) to project completion. o Fuel usage before and after the project.

  • Justification and Anticipated Results The Privacy Act requires that each matching agreement specify the justification for the program and the anticipated results, including a specific estimate of any savings. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1)(B).

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • FINANCIAL STATUS REPORTS (FSRS Except as otherwise provided, for contracts with categorical budgets, Grantee shall submit quarterly FSRs to System Agency by the last business day of the month following the end of each quarter for System Agency review and financial assessment. Grantee shall submit the final FSR no later than forty-five (45) calendar days following the end of the applicable term.

  • Evaluation Reports Where a formal evaluation of an employee's performance is carried out, the employee shall be provided with a copy to read and review. Provision shall be made on the evaluation form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee's signature in two (2) places, one indicating that the employee has read and accepts the evaluation, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the evaluation. The employee shall sign in one of the places provided within seven (7) calendar days. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of an evaluation report unless the signature indicates disagreement with the evaluation. The employee shall receive a copy of the evaluation report at the time of signing. An evaluation report shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.