Observations and Conclusions. Observations and conclusions of the Partnership's audits or inspections of a Producer (or its Affiliates or subcontractors) will be issued to and promptly discussed with the Producer (and KBI hereby agrees to cause such Producer to participate in such discussions) and reasonable corrective action, if needed (as determined by agreement between such Producer and the Partnership), shall be implemented by the Producer at its own expense (and KBI hereby agrees to cause such Producer to implement such action and pay such amounts).
Observations and Conclusions. After looking at existing policies, action plans, strategies, legislations and regulations both at national and county government level, the following observations and concussions are drawn:-
Observations and Conclusions. This study has found evidence of both individualistic and simultaneous subject-verb agreement for both Arabic and Urdu languages. The verbal sentence (VS-Structure) in Arabic always starts with a verb. This verb can occur in three cases: (a) perfective (past tense) like sentences 1 to 6 of Table 1; (b) imperative or command sentences (sentences 7 to 9 of Table 1); or (c) imperfective (present tense) like sentences 1 to 6 of Table 5. However, the Urdu usage is a quite different. With Urdu being an SOV language, we understand that subject–object–verb will appear only in SOV order. This is originally a characteristic of an Ergative language such as ancient Greek, classical Latin, or even Asiatic languages like Pashto (Afghanistan and Pakistan), in addition to several regional languages in India including Marathi, Tamil, Malayalam, Telugu. These languages get their meaning not by the subjects head word order but by an agent–object–verb order. Such construction may not be acceptable in other languages like English. This study has thus made a classification of SV agreement practices in both Arabic and Urdu. Both languages have their respective subject-verb agreement patterns, as stated earlier. Arabic has two principal word orders: SVO, pre-verbal and VSO, post-verbal while Urdu has only one, SOV. In Arabic, the preverbal subject (SVO) triggers number, gender and person agreement, whereas post-verbal subject (VSO) triggers only gender and person. Arabic also has rich agreement paradigms with singular and plural subjects, with a dual feature in the post-verbal word order. In Urdu however, the situation is altogether different as it does not have any dual subject; there exists no verbal duality as in the Arabic language. In Urdu, the verb usually agrees with the gender/number of the subject. Hence, the two languages, Arabic and Urdu, have both similarities and dissimilarities in sentence structures. A close examination of these word orders in this study has supported this argument.
Observations and Conclusions. 1. At European level, a harmonised approach to smart grid security is clearly lacking. Only a limited set of countries have developed security requirements for energy smart grid equipment and devices. These initiatives have been developed in order to meet specific national energy smart grid needs and diverse energy regulatory requirements. This pro- duces diversity in the specifications for security requirements and the lack of common un- derstandings and approaches between member states may hamper international coopera- tion, a need which is acknowledged by all member states and beyond.
