Notices of Violation. On or about April 29, 2021, September 10, 2021 and July 21, 2022, Xxxxxxx served Xxxxxx.xxx, Inc. and certain requisite public enforcement agencies with 60-Day Notices of Violation (notice), alleging that Xxxxxx.xxx, Inc. violated Proposition 65 when it failed to warn customers or consumers in California that the Products expose users to lead. To the best of the Parties’ knowledge, no public enforcer has commenced and is diligently prosecuting the allegations set forth in the notice. The Settling Entity understands that Xxxxxxx may need to issue a 60-Day Notice of Violation expressly naming the Settling Entity. To facilitate the issuance of such sixty-day letter, the Settling Entity agrees to certain conditions set forth below.
Notices of Violation. Except as otherwise disclosed to Purchaser in writing, as of the Effective Date, Seller has not received any written notice from any governmental authority claiming that any of the Properties is in material violation of any applicable law, code, rule, regulation, ordinance, license or permit (including, without limitation, any Environmental Law).
Notices of Violation. On or about February 5, March 11 and April 29, 2021, Xxxxxxx served Walmart Inc. and certain requisite public enforcement agencies with 60-Day Notices of Violation (notices), alleging that Walmart Inc. violated Proposition 65 when it failed to warn customers or consumers in California that the Products expose users to lead. To the best of the Parties’ knowledge, no public enforcer has commenced and is diligently prosecuting the allegations set forth in the notices.
Notices of Violation. Tenant, at its expense, and with diligence and dispatch, shall procure the cancellation or discharge of all notices of violation arising from or otherwise connected with Tenant’s Changes which shall be issued by any governmental, public, or quasi-public authority having or asserting jurisdiction. However, nothing herein contained shall prevent Tenant from contesting, in good faith and at its own expense, any such notice of violation, provided that Landlord’s rights hereunder are in no way compromised or diminished thereby.
Notices of Violation. As soon as Seller has knowledge or immediately upon receipt of written notice thereof, Seller shall provide Purchaser with written notice of any violation of any legal requirements or insurance requirements affecting the Property, any service of process relating to the Property or which affects Seller’s ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement, any complaints or allegations of default received from Tenant, the landowner under the Parking License or any other correspondence or notice received by Seller which has or has the potential to have a material adverse effect on the Property.
Notices of Violation. Seller has received no notice, and, to the Knowledge of Seller, there is no pending notice, of violation of any Legal Requirement, nor the pendency of any Proceeding, threatened or otherwise, which could prohibit, impede, delay or adversely effect the ability of Seller to effect the transactions contemplated in this Agreement.
Notices of Violation. From the Effective Date to the date of Closing, as soon as Contributor has knowledge or immediately upon receipt of written notice thereof, Contributor shall provide GIPLP with written notice of any violation of any legal requirements or insurance requirements affecting the Property, any service of process relating to the Property or which affects Contributor’s ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement, any complaints or allegations of default received from Tenant or any other correspondence or notice received by Contributor which has or has the potential to have a material adverse effect on the Property.
Notices of Violation. Seller shall promptly notify Purchaser in writing of, and shall promptly deliver to Purchaser a copy of any written notice Seller may receive, on or before the Closing, from any Governmental Authority, concerning a violation of laws at the Property that has not been previously disclosed to Purchaser.
Notices of Violation. On or around October 22, 2020, EHA served Osmos Confectionary Co., Ltd., Korean Farm, Inc., Hankook, Xxxx Bros., Inc., the California Attorney General, and all other required public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation of Proposition 65 (“Tteokpokki Notice”). The Tteokpokki Notice alleged that Hankook had violated Proposition 65 by failing to sufficiently warn consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to acrylamide contained in CosMos Tteokpokki Snack. On or around November 24, 2020, XXX served Osmos Confectionary Co., Ltd., Korean Farm, Inc., The K Market, Xxxx Bros., Inc., the California Attorney General, and all other required public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation of Proposition 65 (“Sweet Potato Notice”). The Sweet Potato Notice alleged that Osmos Confectionary Co., Ltd. had violated Proposition 65 by failing to sufficiently warn consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to acrylamide contained in Sweet Potato Shaped Snack. On or around February 4, 2021, EHA served New Kukje Inc., Osmos Confectionary Co., Ltd., Korean Farm, Inc., The K Market, Xxxx Bros., Inc., the California Attorney General, and all other required public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation of Proposition 65 (“Sweet Potato Amended Notice”). The Sweet Potato Amended Notice included New Kukje Inc. as a retailer. On or around July 2, 2021, EHA served New Kukje Inc., Cosmos Confectionary Co., Ltd., Korean Farm, Inc., The K Market, Xxxx Bros., Inc., the California Attorney General, and all other required public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation of Proposition 65 (“Sweet Potato Second Amended Notice”). The Sweet Potato Second Amended Notice corrected the manufacturer to Cosmos Confectionery Co., Ltd. On or around July 2, 2021, EHA served Cosmos Confectionary Co., Ltd., Korean Farm, Inc., Hankook, Xxxx Bros., Inc., the California Attorney General, and all other required public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation of Proposition 65 (“Tteokpokki Amended Notice”). The Tteokpokki Amended Notice corrected the manufacturer to Cosmos Confectionery Co., Ltd. On or around November 17, 2021, EHA served Hankook, New Kukje Inc., Cosmos Confectionary Co., Ltd., Korean Farm, Inc., The K Market, Xxxx Bros., Inc., the California Attorney General, and all other required public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation of Proposition 65 (“...
Notices of Violation. On or about August 8, 2020, October 30, 2020, April 29, 2021 and July 21, 2022, Xxxxxxx served Xxxxxx.xxx, Inc. and certain requisite public enforcement agencies with 60- Day Notices of Violation (notice), alleging that Xxxxxx.xxx, Inc. violated Proposition 65 when it failed to warn customers or consumers in California that the Products expose users to lead. To the best of the Parties’ knowledge, no public enforcer has commenced and is diligently prosecuting the allegations set forth in the notice.
