Mediation and Alternate Dispute Resolution. In the event any Dispute cannot be resolved in a friendly manner as set forth in Section 5.3(a) (Amicable Resolution), the parties intend that such Dispute be resolved by an alternative dispute resolution process (“ADR”). If the Steering Committee is unable to resolve the Dispute as contemplated by Section 5.3(a) (Amicable Resolution), either Motorola or Freescale may demand mediation of the Dispute by written notice to the other, in which case the two parties will select a mediator within ten (10) days after the demand. Neither party may unreasonably withhold consent to the selection of the mediator. The parties may agree to replace mediation with some other form of non-binding ADR such as neutral fact finding or mini-trial. The use of any ADR procedures will not be construed under the doctrines of laches, waiver or estoppel to affect adversely the rights of either party. Each of Motorola and Freescale will bear its own costs of mediation or other form of ADR, but both parties will share the costs of the mediator or other arbiter equally.
Mediation and Alternate Dispute Resolution. Except for disputes with respect to intellectual property which must be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction, to the extent that any misunderstanding or dispute cannot be resolved agreeably in a friendly manner, the dispute will be mediated by a mutually-acceptable mediator to be chosen by HOKU and NISSAN within forty-five (45) days after written notice by one of the parties demanding mediation. Neither Party may unreasonably withhold consent to the selection of a mediator, however, by mutual agreement either HOKU or NISSAN may postpone mediation until each has completed specified but limited discovery with respect to a dispute. The parties may also agree to attempt some other form of alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) in lieu of mediation, including by way of example and without limitation neutral fact-finding or a mini-trial. Any mediation or ADR under this Agreement shall take place in the County of Santa Xxxxx, State of California, U.S.A. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Evidence shall exclusively apply in any mediation or ADR between the Parties pursuant to this Agreement. Any dispute, other than a dispute with respect to intellectual property which must be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction, which the Parties cannot resolve through negotiation, mediation or other form of ADR within six months of the date of the initial demand for it by one of the Parties may then be submitted to the courts for resolution. The use of any ADR procedures will not be construed under the doctrines of laches, waiver or estoppel to affect adversely the rights of either party. Nothing in this Section 11.9.2 will prevent either Party from resorting to judicial proceedings (subject to Section 11.10 below) if (i) good faith efforts to resolve the dispute under these procedures have been unsuccessful or (ii) interim relief from a court is necessary to prevent serious and irreparable injury to one party or to others.
Mediation and Alternate Dispute Resolution a) The Employer and the Union have agreed to appoint Xxx Xxxxxxxx or Xxxx Xxxxxx (alternate) to facilitate mediation or other alternate dispute resolution processes (as determined by the parties).
Mediation and Alternate Dispute Resolution. (a) To the extent that any misunderstanding or dispute with respect to one or more of the terms of this Agreement ("DISPUTE") cannot be resolved in a friendly manner as set forth in SECTION 9.7, the parties intend that such Dispute be resolved by an alternative dispute resolution process ("ADR"), which shall require the escalation of any Dispute, first, to the level of one senior executive of each of Motorola and Propel (the "SENIOR OFFICERS") and then to the head of Motorola's Communications Enterprise (or its successor) and the CEO of Propel in an attempt to resolve any such Dispute by negotiation. If the Senior Officers and/or the head of Motorola's Communications Enterprise and the Propel CEO are unable to resolve the Dispute within ten days after the matter is referred to them, either Motorola or Propel may demand mediation of the Dispute by written notice to the other. The two parties shall select a mediator within ten days after the demand and neither of the parties may unreasonably withhold consent to the selection of the mediator and both parties shall share the cost of mediation equally. The parties may agree to replace mediation with some other form of non-binding ADR such as neutral fact finding or mini-trial. Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent either Motorola or Propel from commencing formal litigation proceedings if (i) good faith efforts to resolve the Dispute under these procedures have been unsuccessful, or (ii) any delay resulting from efforts to mediate such dispute could result in serious and irreparable injury to either Motorola or Propel. The use of any ADR procedures will not be construed under the doctrines of laches, waiver or estoppel to affect adversely the rights of either party.
Mediation and Alternate Dispute Resolution. In the event any Dispute cannot be resolved in a friendly manner as set forth in Section 7.3(a), the parties intend that such Dispute be resolved by mediation (or some other mutually agreed upon alternative dispute resolution process (“ADR”)). If the Dispute Resolution Committee is unable to resolve the Dispute as contemplated by Section 7.3(a), either Manitowoc ParentCo or SpinCo may demand mediation of the Dispute by written notice to the other in which case the two parties will select a mediator within ten (10) days after the demand. Neither party may unreasonably withhold consent to the selection of the mediator. The use of any ADR procedures will not be construed under the doctrines of laches, waiver or estoppel to affect adversely the rights of either party. Each of Manitowoc ParentCo and SpinCo will bear its own costs of mediation or other form of ADR, but both parties will equally share the costs of the mediator (or other neutral).
Mediation and Alternate Dispute Resolution. If the Dispute Committee is unable to resolve the Dispute as contemplated by Section 10.3(a), either Agilent or Verigy may demand non-binding mediation of the Dispute by written notice to the other in which case the two parties will select a mediator within ten (10) days after the demand. Neither party may unreasonably withhold consent to the selection of the mediator. The parties may agree to replace mediation with some other form of non-binding alternative dispute resolution process ("ADR") such as neutral fact finding or mini-trial. The use of any ADR procedures will not be construed under the doctrines of laches, waiver or estoppel to affect adversely the rights of either party. Each of Agilent and Verigy will bear its own costs of mediation or other form of ADR, but both parties will share the costs of the mediator or other arbiter equally.
Mediation and Alternate Dispute Resolution. (a) In the event any Dispute cannot be resolved in a friendly manner as set forth in Section 9.7, the parties intend that such Dispute be resolved by ADR as defined and set forth in the Separation and Distribution Agreement. Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent either Motorola or the Company from commencing formal litigation proceedings if (i) good faith efforts to resolve the Dispute under these procedures have been unsuccessful, or (ii) any delay resulting from efforts to mediate such dispute could result in serious and irreparable injury to either Motorola or the Company. The use of any ADR procedures will not be construed under the doctrines of laches, waiver or estoppel to affect adversely the rights of either party.
Mediation and Alternate Dispute Resolution. (a) To the extent that any misunderstanding or dispute with respect to one or more of the terms of this Agreement ("DISPUTE") cannot be resolved in a friendly manner as set forth in SECTION 11, the parties intend that such Dispute be resolved by an alternative dispute resolution process ("ADR"), which shall require the escalation of any Dispute, first, to the level of one senior executive of each of Motorola, Inc. and Propel, Inc. (the "SENIOR OFFICERS") and then to the head of Motorola's Communications Enterprise (or its successor) and the CEO of Propel, Inc. in an attempt to resolve any such Dispute by negotiation. If the head of Motorola's Communications Enterprise and the Propel CEO and/or the Senior Officers are unable to resolve the Dispute within ten (10) days after the matter is referred to them, either Motorola, Inc. or Propel, Inc. may demand mediation of the Dispute by written notice to the other. The two parties shall select a mediator within ten days after the demand and neither of the parties may unreasonably withhold consent to the selection of the mediator and both parties shall share the cost of mediation equally. The parties may agree to replace mediation with some other form of non-binding ADR such as neutral fact finding or mini-trial. Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent either Motorola or Propel Israel from commencing formal litigation proceedings if (i) good faith efforts to resolve the Dispute under these procedures have been unsuccessful, or (ii) any delay resulting from efforts to mediate such dispute could result in serious and irreparable injury to either Motorola or Propel Israel. The use of any ADR procedures will not be construed under the doctrines of laches, waiver or estoppel to affect adversely the rights of either party.
Mediation and Alternate Dispute Resolution. (A) Except for disputes with respect to Intellectual Property which must be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction (as determined pursuant to Section 11.1(c)), to the extent that any misunderstanding or dispute cannot be resolved agreeably in a friendly manner, any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or relating to the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Agreements (other than the Transition Services Agreement), or the validity, interpretation, breach or termination of any such agreement, including claims seeking redress or asserting rights under any law (a “Dispute”), will be mediated by a mutually-acceptable mediator to be chosen by the Seller and the Purchaser within forty-five (45) days after written notice (a “Notice”) by one of the parties demanding mediation. Neither party may unreasonably withhold consent to the selection of a mediator, however, by mutual agreement the Seller and the Purchaser may postpone mediation until each has completed specified but limited discovery with respect to a dispute. The parties may also agree to attempt some other form of alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) in lieu of mediation, including by way of example neutral fact-finding or a mini-trial. Any mediation pursuant to this section or ADR in lieu thereof, as applicable, will be subject to the following:
Mediation and Alternate Dispute Resolution. Except for disputes with respect to Intellectual Property which must be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction, to the extent that any misunderstanding or dispute cannot be resolved agreeably in a friendly manner, the dispute will be mediated by a mutually-acceptable mediator to be chosen by Seller and Buyer within forty-five (45) days after written notice by one of the parties demanding mediation. Neither party may unreasonably withhold consent to the selection of a mediator, however, by mutual agreement Seller and Buyer may postpone mediation until each has completed specified but limited discovery with respect to a dispute. The parties may also agree to attempt some other form of alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) in lieu of mediation, including by way of example and without limitation neutral fact-finding or a mini-trial. Any dispute, other than a dispute with respect to Intellectual Property which must be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction, which the parties cannot resolve through negotiation, mediation or other form of ADR within six months of the date of the initial demand for it by one of the parties may then be submitted to the courts for resolution. The use of any ADR procedures will not be construed under the doctrines of laches, waiver or estoppel to affect adversely the rights of either party. Nothing in this Section 8.5 will prevent either party from resorting to judicial proceedings if (i) good faith efforts to resolve the dispute under these procedures have been unsuccessful or (ii) interim relief from a court is necessary to prevent serious and irreparable injury to one party or to others.
