Common use of Mediation and Alternate Dispute Resolution Clause in Contracts

Mediation and Alternate Dispute Resolution. Except for disputes with respect to intellectual property which must be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction, to the extent that any misunderstanding or dispute cannot be resolved agreeably in a friendly manner, the dispute will be mediated by a mutually-acceptable mediator to be chosen by HOKU and NISSAN within forty-five (45) days after written notice by one of the parties demanding mediation. Neither Party may unreasonably withhold consent to the selection of a mediator, however, by mutual agreement either HOKU or NISSAN may postpone mediation until each has completed specified but limited discovery with respect to a dispute. The parties may also agree to attempt some other form of alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) in lieu of mediation, including by way of example and without limitation neutral fact-finding or a mini-trial. Any mediation or ADR under this Agreement shall take place in the County of Santa Xxxxx, State of California, U.S.A. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Evidence shall exclusively apply in any mediation or ADR between the Parties pursuant to this Agreement. Any dispute, other than a dispute with respect to intellectual property which must be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction, which the Parties cannot resolve through negotiation, mediation or other form of ADR within six months of the date of the initial demand for it by one of the Parties may then be submitted to the courts for resolution. The use of any ADR procedures will not be construed under the doctrines of laches, waiver or estoppel to affect adversely the rights of either party. Nothing in this Section 11.9.2 will prevent either Party from resorting to judicial proceedings (subject to Section 11.10 below) if (i) good faith efforts to resolve the dispute under these procedures have been unsuccessful or (ii) interim relief from a court is necessary to prevent serious and irreparable injury to one party or to others.

Mediation and Alternate Dispute Resolution. Except for disputes with respect to intellectual property which must be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction, to the extent that any misunderstanding or dispute cannot be resolved agreeably in a friendly manner, the dispute will be mediated by a mutually-acceptable mediator to be chosen by HOKU and NISSAN within forty-five (45) days after written notice by one of the parties demanding mediation. Neither Party may unreasonably withhold consent to the selection of a mediator, however, by mutual agreement either HOKU or NISSAN may postpone mediation until each has completed specified but limited discovery with respect to a dispute. The parties may also agree to attempt some other form of alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) in lieu of mediation, including by way of example and without limitation neutral fact-finding or a mini-trial. Any mediation or ADR under this Agreement shall take place in the County of Santa Xxxxx, State of California, U.S.A. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Evidence shall exclusively apply in any mediation or ADR between the Parties pursuant to this Agreement. HOKU Initials & Date /s/ DS Sept. 10, 2004 NISSAN Initials & Date /s/ HT Sept. 6, 2004 [ * ] = CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY BRACKETS, HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 406 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. Any dispute, other than a dispute with respect to intellectual property which must be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction, which the Parties cannot resolve through negotiation, mediation or other form of ADR within six months of the date of the initial demand for it by one of the Parties may then be submitted to the courts for resolution. The use of any ADR procedures will not be construed under the doctrines of laches, waiver or estoppel to affect adversely the rights of either party. Nothing in this Section 11.9.2 10.9.2 will prevent either Party from resorting to judicial proceedings (subject to Section 11.10 10.10 below) if (i) good faith efforts to resolve the dispute under these procedures have been unsuccessful or (ii) interim relief from a court is necessary to prevent serious and irreparable injury to one party or to others.

Mediation and Alternate Dispute Resolution. Except for disputes with respect to intellectual property which must be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction, to the extent that any misunderstanding or dispute cannot be resolved agreeably in a friendly manner, the dispute will be mediated by a mutually-acceptable mediator to be chosen by HOKU and NISSAN within forty-five (45) days after written notice by one of the parties demanding mediation. Neither Party may unreasonably withhold consent to the selection of a mediator, however, by mutual agreement either HOKU or NISSAN may postpone mediation until each has completed specified but limited discovery with respect to a dispute. The parties may also agree to attempt some other form of alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) in lieu of mediation, including by way of example and without limitation neutral fact-finding or a mini-trial. Any mediation or ADR under this Agreement shall take place in the County of Santa Xxxxx, State of California, U.S.A. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Evidence shall exclusively apply in any mediation or ADR between the Parties pursuant to this Agreement. Any dispute, other than a dispute with respect to intellectual property which must be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction, which the Parties cannot resolve through negotiation, mediation or other form of ADR within six months of the date of the initial demand for it by one of the Parties may then be submitted to the courts for resolution. The use of any ADR procedures will not be construed under the doctrines of laches, waiver or estoppel to affect adversely the rights of either party. Nothing in this Section 11.9.2 9.9.2 will prevent either Party from resorting to judicial proceedings (subject to Section 11.10 9.10 below) if (i) good faith efforts to resolve the dispute under these procedures have been unsuccessful or (ii) interim relief from a court is necessary to prevent serious and irreparable injury to one party or to others.

Mediation and Alternate Dispute Resolution. Except for disputes with respect to intellectual property which must be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction, to the extent that any misunderstanding or dispute cannot be resolved agreeably in a friendly manner, the dispute will be mediated by a mutually-acceptable mediator to be chosen by HOKU and NISSAN within forty-five (45) days after written notice by one of the parties demanding mediation. Neither Party may unreasonably withhold consent to the selection of a mediator, however, by mutual agreement either HOKU or NISSAN may postpone mediation until each has completed specified but limited discovery with respect to a dispute. The parties may also agree to attempt some other form of alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) in lieu of mediation, including by way of example and without limitation neutral fact-finding or a mini-trial. Any mediation or ADR under this Agreement shall take place in the County of Santa Xxxxx, State of California, U.S.A. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Evidence shall exclusively apply in any mediation or ADR between the Parties pursuant to this Agreement. Any dispute, other than a dispute with respect to intellectual property which must be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction, which the Parties cannot resolve through negotiation, mediation or other form of ADR within six months of the date of the initial demand for it by one of the Parties may then be submitted to the courts for resolution. The use of any ADR procedures will not be construed under the doctrines of laches, waiver or estoppel to affect adversely the rights of either party. HOKU Initials & Date /s/ D.S. May 19, 2004 NISSAN Initials & Date /s/ H.T. May 17, 2004 [ * ] = CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY BRACKETS, HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 406 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. Nothing in this Section 11.9.2 7.6 will prevent either Party from resorting to judicial proceedings (subject to Section 11.10 7.7 below) if (i) good faith efforts to resolve the dispute under these procedures have been unsuccessful or (ii) interim relief from a court is necessary to prevent serious and irreparable injury to one party or to others.