GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS Sample Clauses
The "General Recommendations" clause outlines broad guidance or best practices relevant to the agreement or subject matter at hand. It typically provides non-binding advice or suggestions for conduct, such as recommended procedures, safety measures, or operational standards that parties are encouraged to follow. While these recommendations are not mandatory, they serve to promote consistency, efficiency, or safety, helping parties align their actions with industry norms or the intent of the agreement.
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS. The Parties must sign all pages of the contract, including Annexes, so they are also valid. It is better to use ball point or pen (not pencil) in a color other than black (e.g.: blue); this makes it easier to distinguish an original document from a photocopy.
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS. The Parties must sign all pages of the contract, including Annexes, so they are also valid. It is better to use ball point or pen (not pencil) in a color other than black (e.g.: blue); this makes it easier to distinguish an original document from a photocopy. It is preferable (although no mandatory) to express sums of money and percentages in words and figures. Of course, the words and figures for a given amount must match exactly. You also must insert the currency in which the amounts are expressed. It is advisable to use the rules establish by ISO that name each currency by three capital letters (EUR for euro, USD for dollar, GBP for sterling pound, JPY for Japanese yen, etc. - you can get the acronyms of every currency in the website ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇). Once you have chosen the best alternatives of each clause and have completed the blank spaces you should revise the whole contract to remove remaining paragraphs and correct any errors.
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS. Vivid NL will not provide investment advice (as meant in MiFIDII) to its Clients. However, to help Clients make more informed investment decisions themselves, Vivid NL can provide third party data feeds that contain general Buy/Sell/Hold investment recommendations for certain Financial Instruments (General Recommendations). These General Recommendations are ‘investment recommendations’ as laid down in the EU Market Abuse Regulation, are non-personalised and targeted at the general public (and not at specific individual Clients).
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS. In a top-up, the seller instructs to deliver (the buyer instructs to receive) additional securities to cover a position due to deficit of collateral following mark to market valuation. This process will lead to the addition of the same securities or other securities to bring the collateral to the correct market value. - One delivery free message should be sent by the seller, one receipt by the buyer. The message will be identified as part of collateral adjustment using the indicator :22F::SETR//COLO or COLI and REPT//TOPU. The collateral (giver/out) initiation is reflected with a delivery with 22F::SETR//COLO. The collateral (taker/in) initiation is reflected with a receipt with 22F::SETR//COLI. - The message will be linked to the original instruction using the Repo reference and/or a linkage sequence with the message reference of the original instruction. - If the securities collateralised are identical to already collateralised securities, the account servicer will adjust the closing information to reflect the new quantity of collateral. - If the securities collateralised are not identical, the new securities will be added to the pool of collateral linked to the repo deal. - The message will be linked to the original instruction using the Repo reference and/or a linkage sequence with the message reference of the original instruction. - If the securities collateralised are identical to already collateralised securities, the account servicer will adjust the closing information to reflect the new quantity of collateral. - If the securities collateralised are not identical, the new securities will be added to the pool of collateral linked to the repo deal. As the new position will have to be closed like all the other collateralised positions, a new collateral movement, free of payment, will be instructed, linked to the repo deal.
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS. In a substitution operation, the account owner instructs the account servicer to recall the collateral originally instructed and to replace it by other collateral. - Two messages should be sent on the seller side, one to receive back the original collateral and one to deliver the new one. They should be linked to each other using a linkage sequence with a PREV reference and a linkage indicator :22F::LINK//WITH. Indeed, it is important that both instructions settle simultaneously to avoid one party to be doubly exposed. - Two messages should be sent on the buyer side, one to deliver back the original collateral and one to receive the new one. They should be linked to each other using a linkage sequence with a PREV reference and a linkage indicator :22F::LINK//WITH. Indeed, it is important that both instructions settle simultaneously to avoid one party to be doubly exposed. - The two messages will be identified as part of a substitution transaction using the Repo Type indicator :22F::REPT//CADJ - The two messages will be linked to the original instruction using the Repo reference and/or a linkage sequence with the message reference of the original instruction. - It may happen that when the collateral substitution is instructed, the closing leg has not yet been instructed (e.g. open ended repo). See buyer message flow example. If the closing leg instruction was already sent, the SWAP MT 540-542 instruction should also lead to the amendment of the closing leg to reflect the collateral change. The account owner should not have to cancel and replace the closing leg. If the closing leg instruction was not sent yet, when it is eventually sent, it must reflect the repo details at the time it is sent, i.e. provide the correct collateral if it has been swapped. - Settlement confirmations will be sent for both receive and delivery instructions.
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS. In a repo rate change operation, the account owner instructs the account servicer to modify the repo rate of the repo instruction. This process may lead to the modification of the repo closing date as well.
a. If the repo closing leg was already instructed;
b. If the repo closing leg was not instructed yet;
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS. In a withdrawal, the buyer instructs to return (the seller instructs to receive) securities due to excess of collateral following mark to market valuation. - One delivery free message should be sent by the buyer, one receipt by the seller. The message will be identified as part of collateral adjustment using the indicator :22F::SETR//COLI or COLO. The collateral (giver/out) return is reflected with a receipt with 22F::SETR//COLO. The collateral (taker/in) return is reflected with a delivery with 22F::SETR//COLI. - - The message will be linked to the original instruction using the Repo reference and/or a linkage sequence with the message reference of the original instruction. - If the securities collateralised are identical to already collateralised securities, the account servicer will adjust the closing information to reflect the new quantity of collateral.
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS. If other specific areas at this location are to be impacted during planned renovations or demolition, an asbestos survey of these areas will be required. Suspect materials discovered after this inspection should be sampled and analyzed to determine asbestos content and to initiate appropriate responses. Prior to demolition activities, the property should be inspected for potentially hazardous materials. The identified materials should be removed from the property, and properly disposed of in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations. This report should be updated if demolition of buildings covered in this survey does not take place within six months of the date of this survey, i.e. by March 2019.
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS. ■ Allow access to anyone seeking admission to a course (provided prerequisites are satisfied) regardless of real or perceived inability to participate in or pass the course. ■ Tell participants in every course to participate within the limits of their ability and learn as much as they can. For some people, certification may not be important. For those individuals, focus on helping them to learn as much as possible. ■ If there is a request for accommodation, discuss possible solutions with the individual or his or her guardian, and if the individual prefers and provides permission, a medical provider. Authorized Providers may not need to provide the accommodation preferred by the individual as long as the accommodation offered is reasonable (i.e., building a permanent ramp into a pool versus using a swing-arm harness). ■ Certify each participant who can meet course skill and knowledge testing objectives. ■ Use available resources to assist people with special needs. All states have passed Good Samaritan laws or acts that give legal protection to lay rescuers who act in good faith with no expectation of remuneration and are not guilty of gross negligence or willful misconduct. The type of rescuer covered and the scope of protection vary from state to state. The American Red Cross is not in a position to provide legal advice or render interpretations of the validity or scope of the various Good Samaritan laws.
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS. The biomass is available in Croatia, Italy, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain; whereas the availability of wood chips in Greece could be increased if part of firewood production would be allocated to wood chips. • All the previously mentioned countries have to improve or establish the supply chain in order to provide the biofuel to the users, avoiding problems of storage. • The research to improve the existing devices (boilers, stoves and feeding systems) have to be performed in order to decrease their high price or to adapt them to wood chips use. • A key disadvantage is the lack of a lobby in some of the countries. This might provide information of this biomass, which would improve the knowledge about wood chips use. In addition, the lobby of wood chips would encourage to implement this technology at industrial scale since the producers and traders could be willing to invest in it. Moreover, the formation of a lobby in Croatia could make the involvement of the government supporting the use of wood chips as a biofuel.