External Interface Congestion Price Assignment Sample Clauses

External Interface Congestion Price Assignment. The RTC optimization will determine the External Interface Congestion at an External Proxy Bus for a CTS Enabled Interface if the net interchange schedule is limited in the RTC solution due to one or more of the following four reasons: (i) there are more economic transactions offered in a common direction (import or export) than the Transfer Limit of the External Proxy Bus can accommodate, or (ii) there are fewer economic transactions offered in a common direction (import or export) than the Transfer Limit requires, or (iii) the NYCA (system-wide) Ramp Limit prevents the RTC from scheduling one or more external transactions at the External Proxy Bus consistent with the economics of the underlying bids, or (iv) a Ramp Limit prevents the RTC from scheduling one or more external transactions consistent with the economics of the underlying bids (collectively, the “External Proxy Bus Constraints”). Whenever an External Proxy Bus Constraint at a CTS Enabled Interface is limiting in the RTC optimization, the External Interface Congestion at the External Proxy Bus will be assigned, in whole or in part, as set forth below. ISO-NE Limiting: If the RTC optimization is limited by a Transfer Limit determined by an ISO-NE Operating Reserve limitation, an ISO-NE minimum generation limitation, or an ISO-NE capacity deliverability limit, including when the Transfer Limit is adjusted in accordance with Section 5.4 of this Schedule D to accommodate the Ramp Limit while implementing one of these limitations, then the portion of the External Interface Congestion associated with the External Proxy Bus Constraint shall be assigned to ISO-NE. NYISO Limiting: If the RTC optimization is limited by NYCA-wide Ramp Limits, then the portion of the External Interface Congestion associated with the External Proxy Bus Constraint shall be assigned to NYISO. NYISO and ISO-NE Limiting: If the RTC optimization is limited by any Ramp Limit or Transfer Limit that is not specifically addressed in the “ISO-NE Limiting” or “NYISO Limiting” paragraphs above, or by any Transfer Limit or Ramp Limit that results from an operator override, as described in Section 5.2.5 of this Schedule D, the portion of the External Interface Congestion for a CTS Enabled Interface that is associated with an External Proxy Bus Constraint shall be assigned to both Parties equally. The RTC solution may be limited by multiple External Proxy Bus Constraints simultaneously. If this occurs, the foregoing rules will apply to e...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
External Interface Congestion Price Assignment. The RTC optimization will determine the External Interface Congestion at an External Proxy Bus for a CTS Enabled Interface if the net interchange schedule is limited in the RTC solution due to one or more of the following four reasons: (i) there are more economic transactions offered in a common direction (import or export) than the Transfer Limit of the External Proxy Bus can accommodate, or (ii) there are fewer economic transactions offered in a common direction (import or export) than the Transfer Limit requires, or (iii) the NYCA (system-wide) Ramp Limit prevents the RTC from scheduling one or more external transactions at the External Proxy Bus consistent with the economics of the underlying bids, or (iv) a Ramp Limit prevents the RTC from scheduling one or more external transactions consistent with the economics of the underlying bids (collectively, the “External Proxy Bus Constraints”). Whenever an External Proxy Bus Constraint at a CTS Enabled Interface is limiting in the RTC optimization, the External Interface Congestion at the External Proxy Bus will be assigned, in whole or in part, as set forth below.
External Interface Congestion Price Assignment. Under the current inter-regional trading system, ISO-NE and NYISO do not exchange the information necessary to calculate an economically correct congestion price associated with a binding external interface limit.21 Under Coordinated Transaction Scheduling, each ISO will set a congestion component for the CTS Enabled Interface LMP when there is a binding external interface limit. When the external interface is binding at the time it is scheduled, the difference between one ISO’s incremental cost of sending power and the other ISO’s decremental cost of receiving power comprises the total congestion price across the interface. The ISOs will incorporate this difference, less the net amount paid to the marginal (i.e., last accepted) CTS Interface Bid, into the congestion component of their real-time LMPs associated with the CTS Enabled Interface.22 As ISO-NE explained in the ISO-NE CTS Filing, to avoid both ISO-NE and the NYISO charging the total congestion price to market participants (which would result in the double-counting of congestion charges), the total of the two regions’ congestion components of the real-time LMPs associated with an external interface will add up to the desired total congestion price determined at the time the interface is scheduled.23 Section 4.2 of Schedule D addresses how congestion will be allocated between the two regions, with the allocation being based on the cause of the congestion. As described in Section 5.2 of Schedule D, transfer limits will be submitted by ISO-NE to NYISO to help ensure that the economic objective of the RTC solution for clearing CTS Interface Bids does not create or worsen a reliability condition in ISO-NE. When congestion is caused by any of these transfer limits, the congestion will be allocated to ISO-NE and incorporated into the ISO-NE LMP at the External Proxy Bus associated with the CTS Enabled Interface. When the congestion is caused by a NYISO ramping limit, then the congestion will be 21 Congestion is a condition in which transmission system operating limits prevent unconstrained economic dispatch of the power system. Congestion is captured in the Congestion Component of the LMP. The Congestion Component of the LMP differs across locations within the New England transmission system whenever one (or more) internal transmission limits are binding.

Related to External Interface Congestion Price Assignment

  • Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Capability The wind plant shall provide SCADA capability to transmit data and receive instructions from the ISO and/or the Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected, as applicable, to protect system reliability. The Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected and the wind plant Developer shall determine what SCADA information is essential for the proposed wind plant, taking into account the size of the plant and its characteristics, location, and importance in maintaining generation resource adequacy and transmission system reliability in its area.

  • Initial Payment - Transportation Charge Minimum Component Payments by the Agency under the minimum operation, maintenance, power, and replacement component of the Transportation Charge shall commence for each aqueduct reach in the year following the year in which construction of that reach is completed.

  • Archival Back-Up and Disaster Recovery Licensee may use and copy the Product and related Documentation in connection with: i) reproducing a reasonable number of copies of the Product for archival backup and disaster recovery procedures in the event of destruction or corruption of the Product or disasters or emergencies which require Licensee to restore backup(s) or to initiate disaster recovery procedures for its platform or operating systems; ii) reproducing a reasonable number of copies of the Product and related Documentation for cold site storage. “Cold Site” storage shall be defined as a restorable back-up copy of the Product not to be installed until and after the declaration by the Licensee of a disaster; iii) reproducing a back-up copy of the Product to run for a reasonable period of time in conjunction with a documented consolidation or transfer otherwise allowed herein. “Disaster Recovery” shall be defined as the installation and storage of Product in ready-to-execute, back-up computer systems prior to disaster or breakdown which is not used for active production or development.

  • Payment modalities 1. The Council of Europe shall pay the amount mentioned in Article 1(1) in two instalments, as follows: • <percentage> % within 30 days of receipt of this Agreement duly signed;

  • Price Adjustments for OGS Centralized Contracts Periodic price adjustments will occur no more than twice per year on a schedule to be established solely by OGS. Pricing offered shall be fixed for the first twelve (12) months of the Contract term. Such price increases will only apply to the OGS Centralized Contracts and shall not be applied retroactively to Authorized User Agreements or any Mini-bids already submitted to an Authorized User. Price Decreases Price decreases may be made at any time. Additionally, some price decreases shall be calculated in accordance with Appendix B, section 17, Pricing.

  • Training Assignments The Supervisor or designee may establish written training assignments to enable an employee to gain the additional experience and training required for the job for a period of time not to exceed two years. At the completion of the training assignment, the employee’s pay will be set no less than the entry rate of pay for the occupational pay band.

  • Local Health Integration Networks and Restructuring In the event of a health service integration with another service provider the Employer and the Union agree to meet.

  • CONTRACT EXHIBIT I PREFERRED PRICING AFFIDAVIT This preferred-pricing affidavit is entered into in accordance with section 216.0113, F.S., and as required by Contract No. 80101507-21-STC-ITSA (“Contract”) between (“Contractor”) and the Department of Management Services. As the person authorized by Contractor to sign this affidavit, I attest that the Contractor is in full compliance with the preferred-pricing clause of the Contract. Contractor’s Name: By: Signature Printed Name/Title Date: STATE OF COUNTY OF Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this day of , by . Signature of Notary Vendor Name: FEIN# Vendor’s Authorized Representative Name and Title: Address: City, State, and Zip code: Phone Number: ( ) - E-mail: CORPORATE SEAL (IF APPLICABLE) (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) [Check One] Personally Known OR Produced the following I.D.

  • OGS Centralized Contract Terms and Conditions have been renumbered as depicted in the following chart: Current Amended Section Title 4.25 4.26 Severability 4.26 4.27 Entire Agreement

  • Price Schedule, Payment Terms and Billing, and Price Adjustments (a) Price Schedule: Price Schedule under this Contract is set forth in Exhibit B.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.