Evaluation for Tenure Sample Clauses

Evaluation for Tenure. A full-time member may be considered for tenure in any year of the probationary period if the member so requests. Denial of tenure prior to the sixth (6th) year of service shall not prejudice subsequent applications for tenure and in no case shall be construed as a ground for termination of employment, but the evaluatory material shall be available as part of the record. The DEC must evaluate a non-tenured full-time member for tenure in the member’s sixth (6th) year of credited service. Evaluations shall be completed, and all recommendations shall be forwarded to the President in accordance with the schedule in Table 1. The President shall notify the affected member of the Board of Regents’ tenure decision by the appropriate date specified in Table 1. TABLE 1 – EVALUATION PROCESS DUE DATES 3,4 STEP 1st Year Renewals 2nd or Later Year Renewals Penultimate Year Tenure Candidates5 Promotio n Professional Assessment Aug. Jan. Aug. Jan. Aug. Jan. All Art. 4.12 B Sep25 C Feb1 Oct1 Mar15 Oct1 Oct1 Sep20 Oct1 Oct1 D Feb10 Oct10 Xxx00 Xxx00 Oct20 Xxx00 Xxx00 Nov1 E Feb20 Oct20 Apr15 Nov15 Nov15 Nov1 Nov15 Dec1 F Feb25 Oct25 May1 Dec1 Dec18 Nov13 Dec18 Feb1 G Mar5 Nov25 Mar5 H Mar1 Nov1 May31 Dec31 Apr15 Nov30 Apr15 March1 I May31 Dec31 May31 Step Description A DEC receives (See Article 4.11.1) and reviews records and notifies members who meet promotion standards or otherwise must be evaluated.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (18)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation for Tenure. The Department Chair shall provide the Department Rank and Tenure Committee with copies of all assessment summaries for the probationary period. These summaries shall be included in the written evaluation submitted by the Department Rank and Tenure Committee.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
Evaluation for Tenure. A full-time member may be considered for tenure in any year of the probationary period if the member so requests. Denial of tenure prior to the sixth (6th) year of service shall not prejudice subsequent applications for tenure and in no case shall be construed as a ground for termination of employment, but the evaluatory material shall be available as part of the record. The DEC must evaluate a non-tenured full-time member for tenure in the member’s sixth (6th) year of credited service. Evaluations shall be completed and all recommendations shall be forwarded to the President in accordance with the schedule in Table 1. The President shall notify the affected member of the Board of Trustees’ tenure decision by the appropriate date specified in Table 1 (I). CSU-AAUP Collective Bargaining Agreement 2002-2006
Sample 1
Evaluation for Tenure. A full-time member may be considered for tenure in any year of the probationary period if the member so requests. Denial of tenure prior to the sixth (6th) year of service shall not prejudice subsequent applications for tenure and in no case shall be construed as a ground for termination of employment, but the evaluatory material shall be available as part of the record. The DEC must evaluate a non-tenured full-time member for tenure in the member’s sixth (6th) year of credited service. Evaluations shall be completed and all recommendations shall be forwarded to the President in accordance with the schedule in Table 1. The President shall notify the affected member of the Board of Trustees’ tenure decision by the appropriate date specified in Table 1. TABLE 1 – Evaluation Process Due Dates3,4 3 The evaluation schedule for those members who are not appointed at the beginning of a semester shall follow the evaluation schedule of members employed at the beginning of the semester closest to their appointment date. 4 If any of the dates above fall on a weekend or holiday, the deadline shall be the close of the business on the business day preceding the date listed.
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation for Tenure

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Evaluation Period Customer’s right to use the Services on a Trial Basis are time-limited and will terminate immediately upon the earlier of (i) the trial end date as specified in an Order Form or other document executed by the parties regarding such trial, or (ii) the start date of when Customer purchases a right to use such Services on a non-Trial Basis, or (iii) the date when QuoVadis terminates Customer’s right to use the Services on a Trial Basis (which QuoVadis may do at any time in its sole discretion). Customer must cease using the Services on a Trial Basis upon any such termination.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is experienced and knowledgeable in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, accounting, marketing, land, engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Subject Property and value thereof.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

  • Form B - Contractor’s Annual Employment Report Throughout the term of the Contract by May 15th of each year the Contractor agrees to report the following information to the State Agency awarding the Contract, or if the Contractor has provided Contract Employees pursuant to an OGS centralized Contract, such report must be made to the State Agency purchasing from such Contract. For each covered consultant Contract in effect at any time between the preceding April 1st through March 31st fiscal year or for the period of time such Contract was in effect during such prior State fiscal year Contractor reports the:

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.