Deterrence. Except for information relating to general economic climate and general industry conditions and any changes of law, the Vendors have no information or knowledge of any fact relating to the Vendors's Rights, the Corporation's business or the Corporation's ownership and operation of the Corporation's Assets not disclosed to the Purchaser or JAWS which, if known to the Purchaser or JAWS, might reasonably be expected to deter the Purchaser from completing the transactions herein contemplated.
Deterrence. The RTC and Union are committed to eliminating the effects of substance abuse in the workplace. All employees are prohibited from using, possessing, buying or selling drugs or alcohol in the workplace, are prohibited from reporting to work or being subject to work (specifically on standby or on break) with prohibited drugs active in their systems or while under the influence of alcohol.
Deterrence. No adjustment for deterrence is required in this case.
Deterrence. Consider social welfare in the absence of sentencing discretion. If the fact find- ers weigh the consequences of their decision, then a determinate sentencing scheme imposing t¯ yields total welfare equal to ∫ Wt¯ = T ∫ p(t¯) u(t¯; t) gH(p, t)dpdt − ∫ ∫ p(t¯) c1(t¯) gB(p, t)dpdt (2.5) T − ∫ ∫ p(t¯) c2 gH (p, t)dpdt + w ∫ ∞ (b − h) f H(b)db, T 0 π∆G(t¯)t¯ where T is the support of the target sentence, w is the relative weight placed on deterrence, and ∆G(t) ≡ GB(p(t)) − GH(p(t)). The sentence is assumed costless to society for simplicity.9 The first three terms capture the average utility from punishing the guilty, the cost of wrongful convictions, and the cost of false acquittals, respectively. For example, in the second term, since a fact finder chooses her burden of proof p(t¯) for sentence t¯ via (1), innocent defendants with evidence p ≥ p(t¯) are convicted, incurring cost c1(t¯). The last term is the benefit from deterrence.10 9The addition of a cost function on t¯ modifies the results in predictable ways. 10Assume deterrence is incomplete (π∆G(t¯)t¯ < h ∀ t¯). Potential offenders commit the harmful act if and only if their expected gain from the act, b, exceeds the expected cost, which is the difference between the expected punishment when breaking and obeying the law, πt¯[1 − GH(p(t¯))] − πt¯[1 − GB(p(t¯))]. Therefore, the last term integrates over those personal benefits where b ≥ π∆G(t¯)t¯. Assuming the second-order condition holds, the first-order condition for (5) with respect to t¯ conveys the intuition behind choosing the optimal determinate sentencing scheme. Rearranging the first-order condition gives F p(t¯) ∫ ∫ 1 ∂u(t¯; t) ∂p(t¯) ∫ ¯ ¯ ∂p(t¯) ∫ ¯ ∂t¯ = ∂t¯ u(t; t) gH(p(t), t)dt + ∂p(t¯) ∫ ¯ ¯ ∫ ∫ 1 F F gH(p, t)dpdt + ∂t¯ F c1(t) gB(p(t), t)dt + ∂t¯ c2 gH(p(t), t)dt gB(p, t)dpdt ∂c1(t¯) ∂t¯
Deterrence a. With the use of technology retailers and law enforcement can help educate the public that offenders will be arrested and prosecuted. Technology such as placing LPRs in retail centers to identify repeat offenders and direct video connectivity will be used to deter future crimes.
Deterrence. School Resource Officers will engage in activities designed to positively impact the number of crimes committed on or near school property by: • Providing preventive patrol in order to reduce loitering on school premises or adjacent properties, drug and alcohol use, assaults, and other anti-social behavior • Providing security for special school functions such as athletic events, school dances, band concerts, and field trips • Assisting citizens or business owners living or operating in school areas with any difficulties encountered in interacting with students • Informing merchants serving school-age clientele of ways to prevent vandalism and shoplifting Police Conduct in the School Setting Police officers who have contact with schools must be sensitive to school officials' responsibilities. Officers should make a concerted effort to develop and maintain a cooperative atmosphere. School Resource Officers have a professional responsibility to conduct themselves in a courteous, purposeful, and cooperative manner. Disagreements will be arbitrated privately between involved police and school staff. Failure to reach a mutually satisfactory course of action should be resolved by referral to appropriate superiors. School staff with concerns regarding the School Resource Officer's conduct should notify the school principal. The school principal should then inform the Investigative Team Commander, Field Operations Commander, or the Chief of Police. School Resource Officers should not take advantage of the school's "captive audience" for routine police investigations. The school's primary purpose is to educate, and nonessential interviews by police and others may be disruptive. Unless an emergency exists, School Resource Officers should contact designated school officials and/or parents prior to personally requesting information from students, interviewing students, or taking students into custody.
Deterrence. Except for information relating to general economic climate and general industry conditions and any changes of law, the Purchaser and Shannon has no information or knowledge of any faxx xxxxting to the Purchaser and Shannon's business or the Purchaser and Shannon's ownership and operation of the Purchaser and Shannon's Assets not disclosed to the Vendors which, if known to the Vendors, might reasonably be expected to deter the Vendors from completing the transactions herein contemplated.
Deterrence. UMC and the Union are committed to eliminating the effects of substance abuse in the workplace. All employees are prohibited from using, possessing, buying or selling drugs or alcohol in the workplace, are prohibited from reporting to work or being subject to work (specifically on standby or on break) with prohibited drugs active in their systems or while under the influence of alcohol.
Deterrence. (Xxxxxxxxx, 2o12) advocated for a contextual definition of Deterrence in CI field, they defined as influencing an adversary's decision making process such that their expected utility from attacking a CI changes after we deter by investing. Cardenas et al. (2oo9) warned on the importance of deterrence in legislation, law enforcement and international collaboration and highlighted the challenge to identify new deterrence mechanism for the security of Cyber Physical Systems (Cardenas, 2oo9).
Deterrence. The Nags Head Elementary School Police Officer will engage in activities designed to reduce the number of crimes committed on or near school property by:
