Xxxxxx and Dr Sample Clauses

Xxxxxx and Dr. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx. The Rev. Canon J. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx has consulted. The Dialogue has met twice annually since its first meeting in January, 2001 in a variety of venues, including seminaries, diocesan/presbytery offices, and at two Presbyterian-Episcopal congregations, Indian Hill Church in Cincinnati and St. Matthew’s Episcopal/Wilton Presbyterian Church in Wilton, Connecticut. The dialogue team was also in conversation with the concurrent work of the Ministry Task Force of CUIC. The Dialogue has extensively examined relevant documents and deliberations from the past and present both in the United States and abroad, including the Formula of Agreement between the PCUSA and the ELCA, United Church of Xxxxxx, and the Reformed Church in America; Call to Common Mission agreement between the Episcopal Church and the ELCA; and the Mutual Recognition and Mutual Reconciliation of Ministries draft document of the CUIC Ministry Task Force. At every meeting of the Dialogue, members have worshipped together using rites approved by either denomination or according to the authorized CUIC liturgy, with ordained ministers of each denomination officiating. Among the most significant achievements of the Dialogue was the co-sponsorship with CUIC of a Consultation on Episcope held in St. Louis in October, 2006. In addition to opening and closing remarks by representatives of the Disciples of Xxxxxx and the Methodist tradition, there were five scholarly papers presented: one by an Episcopalian, two from the Reformed Tradition (PCUSA and UCC) and one each by a member of the ELCA and the Christian Methodist Episcopal Church. These papers, together with three bible studies By the Rev. Xxxx Xxxx (Roman Catholic) and other related presentations have been published in Call to Unity: Resourcing the Church for Ecumenical Ministry, generously published by the Council on Christianity Unity of the Christian Church (Disciples of Xxxxxx)
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Xxxxxx and Dr. H. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx (or such other persons who may serve as replacement nominees for such persons in accordance with such proxy materials) as trustees of the Delaware Trust. 5.
Sample 1Sample 2
Xxxxxx and Dr. Xxx Xxx Ltd /s/ Xxx Xxx I have read the provisions of the above Undertaking and I agree to be bound by such Undertaking and comply with such terms as if I was the Consultant. I will be responsible toward ChemomAb Ltd. (the “Company”) or any of the Company’s direct or indirect parent, subsidiary and affiliated companies, and their respective successors and assigns for the compliance by the Consultant of its obligations under the Undertaking and shall be further responsible and liable towards the Company for any breach by the Consultant of any of its obligations under the Undertaking and for any other liability of the Consultant under the Undertaking. /s/ Xxx Xxx Xxx Xxx, the Consultant’s Representative
Sample 1
Xxxxxx and Dr. Xxxxxx has not revoked Dr. Xxxxxx’s assent to the Agreement as provided in Section 9(c) of this Agreement.
Sample 1
Xxxxxx and Dr. Xxxxx Xxxxx, co-Chairs of the EISWG, will serve as co-leads, and Xxxx Xxxx will serve as Senior Advisor to the Study Team. Task team leads will sit on the Executive Study Team. Xx.
Sample 1
Xxxxxx and Dr. XxxxxXxxxxxxxx agree to do a final review of all paid and unpaid accounts no later than three months after the completion of the locum, so to settle any unpaid invoices.
Sample 1

Related to Xxxxxx and Dr

  • Xxxxxxx and X Xxxx¨cker. A detailed account of Xxxxx Xxxxxx’ version of the standard model. IV. Rev. Math. Phys. 8 (1996) 205–228.

  • Xxxxxxxx and X Xxxxx. Generalized FLP impossibility result for t-resilient asynchronous computations. STOC 1993: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pp. 91–100. ACM, New York (1993)

  • Xxxx and Xx Xxxxxxxx: Pursuant to Section 1(i) of the Investment Management Trust Agreement between Climate Real Impact Solutions II Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”) and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company (the “Trustee”), dated as of _________, 2021 (the “Trust Agreement”), this is to advise you that the Company did not effect a business combination with a Target Business (the “Business Combination”) within the time frame specified in the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, as described in the Company’s Prospectus relating to the Offering. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Trust Agreement. In accordance with the terms of the Trust Agreement, we hereby authorize you to liquidate all of the assets in the Trust Account and transfer the total proceeds into a segregated account held by you on behalf of the Beneficiaries to await distribution to the Public Stockholders. The Company has selected [_________, 20__]1 as the effective date for the purpose of determining when the Public Stockholders will be entitled to receive their share of the liquidation proceeds. You agree to be the Paying Agent of record and, in your separate capacity as Paying Agent, agree to distribute said funds directly to the Company’s Public Stockholders in accordance with the terms of the Trust Agreement and the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation. Upon the distribution of all the funds, net of any payments necessary for reasonable unreimbursed expenses related to liquidating the Trust Account, your obligations under the Trust Agreement shall be terminated, except to the extent otherwise provided in Section 1(i) of the Trust Agreement. Very truly yours, Climate Real Impact Solutions II Acquisition Corporation By: Name: Title: cc: Barclays Capital Inc. BofA Securities, Inc.

  • Xxxxxx and X Xxx, “A unified monotonic approach to generalized linear fractional programming,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 229–259, 2003. [14] X. X. Xxxx, X. X. Xxxxx, and X. Xxxxx, “Xxxxx: Achieving global optimality for a non-convex wireless power control problem,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1553–1563, Mar 2009. [15] X. Xxxxxxxx and X. Xxxxxxx, “Common randomness in information theory and cryptography - part I: Secret sharing,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1121–1132, Jul. 1993. [16] I. Safaka, X. X. Xxxxxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxx, E. Atsan, C. Fragouli, X. Xxxxxxxx, and X. Xxxxxxx, “Exchanging Secrets without Using Cryptography,” arXiv:1105.4991 [cs, math], May 2011, arXiv: 1105.4991. [Online]. Available: xxxx://xxxxx.xxx/abs/1105.4991 [17] I. Safaka, C. Fragouli, X. Xxxxxxxx, and X. Xxxxxxx, “Exchanging pairwise secrets efficiently,” in 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, Apr. 2013, pp. 2265–2273.‌ [18] E. Atsan, I. Safaka, X. Xxxxxx, and X. Xxxxxxxx, “Low cost security for sensor networks,” in 2013 International Symposium on Network Coding (NetCod), Jun. 2013, pp. 1–6. [19] X. Xxxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxxxx, and X. Xxxxxxxxxxx, “Creating Secrets out of Erasures,” in Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing & Networking, ser. MobiCom ’13. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2013, pp. 429–440. [Online]. Available: xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/10.1145/2500423.2500440 [20] X. X. Xxxx and X. Xxxxxxxxxxxx, Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, Mar. 2004. [21] X. X. Xxxxxxxxx, X. Xxxxx, and X. X. Xxxxxxxx, Convex Analysis and Optimization. Athena Scientific, 2003. [22] X. Xxxx, X. X. Xxxxxxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxxx, and X. X. Xxxxxxx, “Secret communication over broadcast erasure channels with state-feedbac,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 61, pp. 4788–4808, Sep. 2015. [23] X. X. XxxXxxxxxxx, The Theory of Error-Correcting Codes, 2nd ed. Amsterdam; New York; New York: North Holland Publishing Co., 1978. [24] C. Fragouli and X. Xxxxxxxx, Network Coding Fundamentals. Hanover, MA: Now Publishers Inc, Jun. 2007.

  • Xxxxxxxxx and X Xxxxxxx. A

  • Xxxxxx Act Any provisions required to be contained in this Agreement by Section 126 and/or Section 130-k or Article 4-A of the New York Real Property Law are hereby incorporated herein, and such provisions shall be in addition to those conferred or imposed by this Agreement; provided, however, that to the extent that such Section 126 and/or 130-k shall not have any effect, and if said Section 126 and/or Section 130-k should at any time be repealed or cease to apply to this Agreement or be construed by judicial decision to be inapplicable, said Section 126 and/or Section 130-k shall cease to have any further effect upon the provisions of this Agreement. In a case of a conflict between the provisions of this Agreement and any mandatory provisions of Article 4-A of the New York Real Property Law, such mandatory provisions of said Article 4-A shall prevail, provided that if said Article 4-A shall not apply to this Agreement, should at any time be repealed, or cease to apply to this Agreement or be construed by judicial decision to be inapplicable, such mandatory provisions of such Article 4-A shall cease to have any further effect upon the provisions of this Agreement.

  • Xxxxx and X Xxxxxxxxxx. Non-Commutative Geometry, Non- Associative Geometry and the Standard Model of Particle Physics, 1401.5083.

  • Xxxxx-Xxxxx Act Xxxxx-Xxxxx Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Xxxxx-Xxxxx Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Xxxxxxxx “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or Subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency.

  • Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act There is and has been no failure on the part of the Company or any of the Company’s directors or officers, in their capacities as such, to comply with any provision of the Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations promulgated in connection therewith (the “Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act”), including Section 402 related to loans and Sections 302 and 906 related to certifications.

  • XXXXXXXX AND W XXXXXXX XXXXXX

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.