WHO IS TO BE EVALUATED Sample Clauses

WHO IS TO BE EVALUATED. All Teachers as defined below in the North Royalton School District will be evaluated each year, with the following exception:  Teachers who receive a cumulative rating of “Accomplished” on any current evaluation, may be evaluated every two years, providing that subsequent evaluations continue to rate the teacher as accomplished. If on any subsequent evaluation a teacher receives a rating of “Skilled” or below, the teacher will be evaluated the next year as per law. In addition, any teacher whose performance rating indicates above expected levels of student growth may choose their credentialed evaluator from those administrators available in their building of assignment. A “teacher” for the purpose of this OTES section of the evaluation manual means a licensed instructor who spends at least 50% of his/her time providing content-related student instruction. Any instructor who instructs less than 50% or is providing ELL, SLP, Counseling or Psychological services, media services or preschool intervention specialists will still be evaluated by utilizing the rubrics applicable for their job classification in Section B of this evaluation manual. These instructors do not fall under the guidelines of OTES and therefore do not have the requirement for 50% of their evaluation to contain student data.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
WHO IS TO BE EVALUATED. 1. All unit members recognized in Article 1, B. GROVEPORT MADISON LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT
Sample 1

Related to WHO IS TO BE EVALUATED

  • PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATION A. The evaluations of school year employees covered by this agreement shall be completed no later than May 30 of each school year for 9-month employees and by June 30 for 10/12-month employees. The evaluation shall be reviewed with the employee, with a copy given to the employee at the conclusion of the review. An employee may present written comments, which shall be attached to the written evaluation document. The evaluator and employee shall sign the evaluation document. The employee’s signature does not constitute approval or disapproval, but only that the evaluation has been reviewed with the employee.

  • Criteria for Evaluation Criteria for employee performance review shall be made available to the employee before the start of the evaluation period and shall remain unchanged during the evaluation period unless the employee is made aware of the changes.

  • Re-evaluation a) When a job has moved to a higher group as a result of re-evaluation, the resulting rate shall be retroactive from the date that Management or the employee has applied to the Plant Job Review Committee for re-evaluation.

  • Performance Evaluations 34.1. The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATION 14.1 The purpose of employee evaluation is to support decisions concerning employee discipline, promotion and improvement. Evaluation shall be the responsibility of the immediate supervisor who shall not be a member of the bargaining unit.

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATIONS 3. Any matter for which there is recourse under State or Federal statutes.

  • Response to Evaluation The teacher shall have the right to make a written response to the evaluation and to have it attached to the evaluation report to be placed in the teacher's personnel file. A copy, signed by both parties, shall be provided to the teacher.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.