Theory of Self Sample Clauses

Theory of Self. Efficacy Self-efficacy refers to perceived capabilities for learning or performing actions at designated levels within specific domains (Bandura, 1997). It is a powerful influence on people’s motivation, achievement and self-regulation (Xxxxxxx, 1997; Xxxxxx et al., 1991). It involves the activities that the school administrators and leaders decide to perform and all the effort that is geared towards the said activity. The level of the principals’ self-efficacy affects the students’ choice of activities, effort invested, persistence, interest and achievement (Pajare, 1996b; 1997; Schunk, 1995). Students too with high self-efficacy participate more readily, work harder, persist longer, show greater interest in learning and achieve higher levels (Bandura, 1997) as compared with learners who doubt their capabilities. Students learn much through observation of their teachers’ behaviors both in and outside classroom. Individuals who feel more efficacious about learning mostly engage in self-regulation activities like goal setting, using effective teaching and learning strategies, monitoring their comprehension, evaluating their goal progress and creating an effective environment for learning by minimizing distractions. School principals as leaders should be in the forefront in provision of conducive environment for learners and trainees both with and without disabilities and connect both learners as study partners. There are several ways of creating self-efficacy; Xxxxxxx postulated that people acquire information to weigh their level of self-efficacy from interpretations of actual performances and modeled experiences (Bandura, 1997). School principals can therefore weigh their level of self- efficacy by evaluating themselves and also obtaining information and interpretations about their performance in terms of conditions modified to accommodate learners and trainees with disabilities and giving the learners an opportunity to evaluate them too. This can be made possible by principals participating in performance appraisal documents. Principals can as well acquire information about their capabilities by comparing their accomplishments with other principals. This can be done by obtaining information of the strategies implemented by other teachers and school heads to make the sector policy implementation process be a success. Another method in which school principals can create self-efficacy is through observation. Observing others succeed in the implementation of...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Theory of Self

  • Theory Counseling is designed to assist an employee in eliminating a problem so that formal discipline will not be necessary.

  • Claims-made limitations The following provisions shall apply if the professional liability coverage is written on a claims-made form:

  • Injury or Damage to Person or Property If either party suffers injury or damage to person or property because of an act or omission of the other party, or of others for whose acts such party is legally responsible, written notice of such injury or damage, whether or not insured, shall be given to the other party within a reasonable time not exceeding twenty-one (21) calendar days after discovery. The notice shall provide sufficient detail to enable the other party to investigate the matter.

  • WARRANTY OF CONTRACTOR’S ABILITY TO PERFORM The Contractor warrants that, to the best of its knowledge, there is no pending or threatened action, proceeding, or investigation, or any other legal or financial condition, that would in any way prohibit, restrain, or diminish the Contractor’s ability to satisfy its Contract obligations. The Contractor warrants that neither it nor any affiliate is currently on the Suspended Vendor List, Convicted Vendor List, or the Discriminatory Vendor List, or on any similar list maintained by any other state or the federal government. The Contractor shall immediately notify the Department in writing if its ability to perform is compromised in any manner during the term of the Contract. Information Technology Staff Augmentation Services Contract No. 80101507-21-STC-ITSA Contract Exhibit F Resume Self-Certification Form Contractor’s candidates shall complete this Resume Self-Certification Form. Completed Resume Self-Certification Forms shall be submitted within the Contractor’s response to Customer’s requests for quote. “I the undersigned do hereby certify, under the penalty of perjury, that information in my resume submitted for consideration of the State of Florida contract position is true, correct, complete, and made in good faith to the best of my knowledge and belief. If an omission, falsification, misstatement, or misrepresentation has been made regarding my education, work ability, experience, employment history, and/or fitness for employment as a contractor, I may be disqualified as a contractor, and the matter will be reported to appropriate agency or law enforcement personnel. I understand that there may be civil and/or criminal penalties for misrepresenting pertinent information in connection with contract positions, including, but not limited to, penalties available under sections 287.133 or 817.566, Florida Statutes. I further understand that if I am not a United States citizen, violation cases may be reported to the US Department of Homeland Security for potential deportation.” “In addition, I the undersigned do hereby consent to the release of my information by employers, educational institutions, law enforcement agencies, and other individuals and organizations to investigators and other authorized agents of Florida for verification and investigation purposes. I understand that any documents submitted to procure a contract(s) with the State of Florida, including resumes, are public records.” Print Full Legal Name of Candidate Candidate’s Signature Date Candidate’s Form of Identification Presented Identification number Contractor’s Witness Signature One Date Contractor’s Witness Signature Two Date Print Name Contractor’s Witness One Print Name Contractor’s Witness Two Information Technology Staff Augmentation Services Contract No. 80101507-21-STC-ITSA Contract Exhibit G Contractor Selection Justification Form Customers shall complete this Contractor Selection Justification Form for each candidate selected and attach all completed forms to the purchase order. Date: Contractor’s Name: _ Contractor’s Contact Information: Candidate’s Name: Address: _ Phone: _ Email: _ Date Candidate will be available: _ Hourly rate of candidate: $ Position candidate recommended for: _ Justification for selection of candidate: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Agency: Division/Section/Unit: _ Printed Name: _ Title: _ Signature _ Date: Information Technology Staff Augmentation Services Contract No. 80101507-21-STC-ITSA Contract Exhibit H Contractor Performance Survey Note: This is an example of the questions contained in the Contractor Performance Survey. The actual survey will be provided in electronic form. Customers shall complete this Contractor Performance Survey for each Contractor on a quarterly basis. Customers will electronically submit the completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) to the Department Contract Manager no later than the due date indicated the Scope of Work. Contractor's Name: Quarter: Purchase Order (PO) Number: PO Total $ Amount: PO Starting Date Ending Date Please review the attached Rating Definitions and provide your opinion by rating the following: Quality of Service

  • Paid Claims without Supporting Documentation Any Paid Claim for which Practitioner cannot produce documentation shall be considered an error and the total reimbursement received by Practitioner for such Paid Claim shall be deemed an Overpayment. Replacement sampling for Paid Claims with missing documentation is not permitted.

  • Obligations of Respondent a. If this Compromise Agreement is executed within thirty (30) calendar days after the date of the Notice, Respondent agrees to pay the sum of $8,000, as full satisfaction of the civil penalty proposed in the Notice, within thirty (30) calendar days of the issuance of the Adopting Order. If this Compromise Agreement is executed between thirty-one (31) and sixty (60) calendar days after the date of the Notice, Respondent agrees to pay the sum of $16,000 as full satisfaction of the civil penalty proposed in the Notice, within thirty (30) calendar days of the issuance of the Adopting Order.

  • Limitation of Actions Any claim or cause of action by Borrower against Silicon, its directors, officers, employees, agents, accountants or attorneys, based upon, arising from, or relating to this Loan Agreement, or any other present or future document or agreement, or any other transaction contemplated hereby or thereby or relating hereto or thereto, or any other matter, cause or thing whatsoever, occurred, done, omitted or suffered to be done by Silicon, its directors, officers, employees, agents, accountants or attorneys, shall be barred unless asserted by Borrower by the commencement of an action or proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction by the filing of a complaint within one year after the first act, occurrence or omission upon which such claim or cause of action, or any part thereof, is based, and the service of a summons and complaint on an officer of Silicon, or on any other person authorized to accept service on behalf of Silicon, within thirty (30) days thereafter. Borrower agrees that such one-year period is a reasonable and sufficient time for Borrower to investigate and act upon any such claim or cause of action. The one-year period provided herein shall not be waived, tolled, or extended except by the written consent of Silicon in its sole discretion. This provision shall survive any termination of this Loan Agreement or any other present or future agreement.

  • No consequential claims Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Article 22, the indemnities herein provided shall not include any claim or recovery in respect of any cost, expense, loss or damage of an indirect, incidental or consequential nature, including loss of profit, except as expressly provided in this Agreement.

  • Claims relating to Intellectual Property Rights 29.1. The Contractor must not infringe any Intellectual Property Rights of any third party in providing the Services or otherwise performing its obligations under the Framework Agreement and must ensure that the provision of the Services and the use or possession of the Deliverables does not infringe such Intellectual Property Rights.

  • Damage to personal clothing An employee shall be reasonably compensated for damage to personal clothing worn on duty, or reimbursed dry cleaning charges for excessive soiling to personal clothing worn on duty, provided the damage or soiling did not occur as a result of the employee’s negligence, or failure to wear the protective clothing provided. Each case shall be determined on its merits by the employer.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.