Sharing information without consent Sample Clauses
The 'Sharing information without consent' clause defines the circumstances under which a party may disclose confidential or personal information without obtaining prior approval from the individual or entity to whom the information pertains. Typically, this clause outlines specific exceptions, such as disclosures required by law, court order, or to protect vital interests, and may set limits on the type and amount of information that can be shared. Its core practical function is to balance the need for privacy with legal or safety obligations, ensuring that information can be shared responsibly in exceptional situations without breaching the overall duty of confidentiality.
Sharing information without consent. It is not always safe, appropriate or feasible to obtain consent to share information. Circumstances where it may not be possible to obtain consent include: Where obtaining consent might be contrary to the public interest; including risk to the health of the person The data subject / confider may be absent or not contactable; The data subject / confider may be permanently or temporarily incapacitated and has no appropriate representative; The data subject / confider has withheld or withdrawn their consent. Under the Common Law Duty of Confidence, the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Human Rights Act 1998 it is possible to disclose information without consent in the cases of serious public interest or in the best interests of an individual. Also under the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (as amended by the Police and Justice Act 2006 and the Policing and Crime Act 2009) for Community Safety purposes. Decisions regarding the disclosure of information without consent must always be made on a case- by-case basis. Any disclosure must always be proportionate and the minimum necessary to achieve the necessary objective. If it is not possible to obtain consent before sharing information, the data subject / confider should be informed as soon as possible after the information has been shared, unless this would be inappropriate (e.g. cause serious harm; effect on ongoing investigation).
Sharing information without consent. 7.6.1 It is intended that information for the purposes of identifying families and allocating them to a level of intervention (tiers 1 – 3) and lead agency, will be shared without consent. A legal justification for this is set out in Appendix I. As a minimum, individuals will be informed that information may be shared and the circumstances in which this could happen unless this poses a risk of harm or danger. As is required by the fair processing requirements of the Data Protection Act 1998, a Privacy Notice has been drafted and is included at Appendix VI. The individuals right to confidentiality are not absolute and may be overridden if evidence that disclosure for specific purposes is necessary in exceptional circumstances. Such as Where it is required by statute Where not to share the information poses a public health risk Where there is a risk of harm to any person Where sharing is required to prevent crime. Where the individual chooses to exercise their right not to provide express consent for information sharing, they must be advised of any constraints that this will put upon the service that can be provided, however the individuals wishes must be respected unless there is a statutory requirement or a significant risk of harm to an individual to override those wishes as indicated above.
7.6.2 It may be necessary to share information without obtaining consent from the child or parent/carer when: The child is at risk of significant harm There is a risk of significant harm to another person The child needs urgent medical treatment The disclosure prevents the child from committing a criminal offence that could place others in jeopardy or places the assessor or any other person at risk of collusion. Information is requested by the police if investigating a serious crime. Sharing that information is required to undertake a statutory function.
7.6.3 Where these situations apply and it is necessary to share information without consent, the reasons for doing so should be recorded. The record must contain details of any third parties and full details of all the information or evidence they have been given.
7.6.4 Where it is not reasonably practical to obtain consent risk assessments and a proportionality test should be conducted between the individual’s right to confidentiality and the need for reasonable intrusion.
7.6.5 Keeping children safe from harm requires professionals and others to share information. There will be situations where professional judgemen...
Sharing information without consent. The law recognises that disclosure of confidential information without consent or a court order may be justified in the public interest to prevent harm to others. The key factor in deciding whether or not to disclose confidential information is proportionality: is the proposed disclosure a proportionate response to the need to protect the individual. The amount of confidential information disclosed, and the number of people to whom it is disclosed, should be no more than is strictly necessary to meet the public interest in protecting health and well-being. The more sensitive the information is, the greater the need must be to justify disclosure and the greater the need to ensure that only those professionals who have to be informed receive the material (‘the need to know basis’). The need to disclose confidential information to others within your own organisation will probably arise more frequently than will be the case for inter-agency disclosure. For example a nurse will need to discuss confidential information with a doctor more frequently than with a social worker. It would probably be accepted that such discussions need to take place within the hospital, so there would usually be implied consent. But if not (e.g. if you disclose information that someone has asked you to keep secret) you will have to decide whether the circumstances justify the disclosure.