Scoring Mechanism Sample Clauses

Scoring Mechanism. The scoring mechanism below will be employed to score the Contractor‟s performance against each KPI. Wherever practical, objective methods rather than subjective methods of obtaining the score shall be employed. Scoring Matrix 1 EXCELLENT: The Contractor is performing excellently, fully meeting and exceeding the required service Levels. 2 SATISFACTORY: The Contractor has met the expected performance target. 3
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Scoring Mechanism. Each person scoring the performance of the service provider will enter a "1" under the appropriate score, I.e. 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1 for each statement. The KPI spreadsheet will automatically calculate the overall scores. Totally Satisfied/Far exceeds expectations 5 Mostly Satisfied/Always meets but at times exceeds expectations 4 Somewhat Satisfied/meets expectations 3 Dissatisfied/below expectations 2 Fail 1 Comments will be provided during the review process for each of the 6 sections. Where a "1" or "2" has been awarded, specific comments related to that particular score will be detailed and shared with the service provider. 360 Degree Feedback Supplier: Inflight Productions Limited Duration: _______________ The aim of 360 degree feedback is for the supplier to provide feedback on Cathay Pacific's performance. It should focus on ways in which an improvement in Cathay's way of working could help the supplier perform the role for which they have been appointed more efficiently. The feedback is meant to be constructive and will help identify areas for Cathay to focus in order to improve the working relationship and efficiency of the supplier. Scores:
Sample 1
Scoring Mechanism. 28.13. The Authority will score the qualitative parts of the Tender in accordance with the general principles and descriptions shown in the table below. Each response, excluding prices, will be marked out of a total possible score of 5. Tenderers are referred to Appendix 2 (Tender Price Submission Scoring) which sets out further explanation on the evaluation and scoring of prices.
Sample 1
Scoring Mechanism. Given the advantages and disadvantages of existing rankings mentioned in Section 2, NLP Rankings ranks universities in the United States on a metric-based scoring based on academic publications, which best serves the needs of prospective NLP students and current researchers in the field. Distinguished from generic university rankings (Section 2.1), NLP Rankings does not consider experts opinions, but only focuses on research achievements reflected by academic publications. Distinguished from NTU Ranking (Section 2.2.1) which measures research impact by citations, NLP Rankings avoid such measurement as it is a gameable metric. Distinguished from CSRankings (Section 2.2.2), NLP Rankings is dedicated only to the field of NLP and have several different scoring features. First, unlike CSRankings where different journals and conferences carry equal weights, in NLP Xxxxxxx, each publication is weighted by its venue and publication type. By default, papers from major venues (CL, TACL, ACL, NAACL, EMNLP) are credited with the weight of 3, other conferences with the weight of 2, and workshops/demonstrations with the weight of 1. Since the weighting can be subjective, weights are customizable on the NLP Rankings platform, which allows users to personalize the weights by their needs and preferences. Following CSRankings, the credit of each publication is evenly distributed to all authors such that each author receives the score of 𝑤 𝑎 where 𝑤 is the weighted credit and 𝑎 is the total number of the authors in the paper. For each publication, the score of each institution is measured by summing the scores of all authors from that institution using the matching algorithm described in Section 3.2. Different from CSRankings, which reflects only the scores of faculty members to measure university score, NLP Rankings accounts for contributions from students as well. For instance, if there are 4 authors in the paper where 2 students and 1 professor are from the institution I1 and 1 professor from the institution I2, NLP Rankings scoring gives 75% of the credit to I1 and 25% to I2, whereas CSRankings gives 25% to both institutions, completely neglecting contributions from students, which may consequently yield misleading comparisons. The third distinctive aspect of NLP Rankings’ scoring mechanism is that it is sensitive to institutional authorship, such that scores earned by an author from one institution will not be transferred to another institution upon the author’s mov...
Sample 1

Related to Scoring Mechanism

  • Purchase Mechanism If the Focus Investor exercises its rights provided in this Section 4.5, the closing of the purchase of the New Securities with respect to which such right has been exercised shall take place within 30 calendar days after the giving of notice of such exercise, which period of time shall be extended for a maximum of 180 days in order to comply with applicable laws and regulations (including receipt of any applicable regulatory or corporate approvals). The Company and the Focus Investor agree to use commercially reasonable efforts to secure any regulatory or corporate approvals or other consents, and to comply with any law or regulation necessary in connection with the offer, sale and purchase of, such New Securities.

  • Adjustment Mechanism If an adjustment of the Exercise Price is required pursuant to this Section 6 (other than pursuant to Section 6.4), the Holder shall be entitled to purchase such number of shares of Common Stock as will cause (i) (x) the total number of shares of Common Stock Holder is entitled to purchase pursuant to this Warrant following such adjustment, multiplied by (y) the adjusted Exercise Price per share, to equal the result of (ii) (x) the dollar amount of the total number of shares of Common Stock Holder is entitled to purchase before adjustment, multiplied by (y) the total Exercise Price before adjustment.

  • Exclusive Dispute Resolution Mechanism The Parties agree that the procedures set forth in this Article 12 shall be the exclusive mechanism for resolving any dispute, controversy, or claim (collectively, “Disputes”) between the Parties that may arise from time to time pursuant to this Agreement relating to any Party’s rights and/or obligations hereunder that cannot be resolved through good faith negotiation between the Parties.

  • Testing Procedure Limitations The Asset Representations Reviewer will only be required to perform the Tests, and will not be obligated to perform additional procedures on any Review Receivable or to provide any information other than a Review Report. However, the Asset Representations Reviewer may provide additional information in a Review Report about any Review Receivable that it determines in good faith to be material to the Asset Representations Review.

  • Collection Allocation Mechanism On the CAM Exchange Date, (a) the Commitments shall automatically and without further act be terminated as provided in Article VII, (b) each Lender shall become obligated to fund, within one Business Day, all participations in outstanding Swingline Loans held by it (it being agreed that the CAM Exchange shall not result in a reallocation of such funding obligations, but only of the funded participations resulting therefrom) and (c) the Lenders shall automatically and without further act be deemed to have made reciprocal purchases of interests in the Designated Obligations such that, in lieu of the interests of each Lender in the particular Designated Obligations that it shall own as of such date and immediately prior to the CAM Exchange, such Lender shall own an interest equal to such Lender’s CAM Percentage in each Designated Obligation. Each Lender, each person acquiring a participation from any Lender as contemplated by Section 11.04 and each Borrower hereby consents and agrees to the CAM Exchange. Each Borrower and each Lender agrees from time to time to execute and deliver to the Administrative Agent all such promissory notes and other instruments and documents as the Administrative Agent shall reasonably request to evidence and confirm the respective interests and obligations of the Lenders after giving effect to the CAM Exchange, and each Lender agrees to surrender any promissory notes originally received by it hereunder to the Administrative Agent against delivery of any promissory notes so executed and delivered; provided that the failure of any Borrower to execute or deliver or of any Lender to accept any such promissory note, instrument or document shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the CAM Exchange. As a result of the CAM Exchange, on and after the CAM Exchange Date, each payment received by the Administrative Agent pursuant to any Loan Document in respect of the Designated Obligations shall be distributed to the Lenders pro rata in accordance with their respective CAM Percentages (to be redetermined as of each such date of payment or distribution to the extent required by the next paragraph), but giving effect to assignments after the CAM Exchange Date, it being understood that nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit the assignment of a proportionate part of all an assigning Lender’s rights and obligations in respect of a single Class of Commitments or Loans. In the event that, after the CAM Exchange, the aggregate amount of the Designated Obligations shall change as a result of the making of an LC Disbursement of either Tranche by an Issuing Bank that is not reimbursed by the applicable Borrower, then (a) each Lender of such Tranche shall, in accordance with Section 2.05(d), promptly purchase from the applicable Issuing Bank a participation in such LC Disbursement in the amount of such Lender’s Tranche One Percentage or Tranche Two Percentage, as the case may be, of such LC Disbursement (without giving effect to the CAM Exchange), (b) the Administrative Agent shall redetermine the CAM Percentages after giving effect to such LC Disbursement and the purchase of participations therein by the applicable Lenders, and the Lenders shall automatically and without further act be deemed to have made reciprocal purchases of interests in the Designated Obligations such that each Lender shall own an interest equal to such Lender’s CAM Percentage in each of the Designated Obligations and (c) in the event distributions shall have been made in accordance with the preceding paragraph, the Lenders shall make such payments to one another as shall be necessary in order that the amounts received by them shall be equal to the amounts they would have received had each LC Disbursement been outstanding immediately prior to the CAM Exchange. Each such redetermination shall be binding on each of the Lenders and their successors and assigns and shall be conclusive absent manifest error.

  • Market disruption; non-availability 3.6.1 If and whenever, at any time prior to the commencement of any Interest Period:

  • Market Conditions Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, settlement and payment for Foreign Assets received for the account of the Portfolios and delivery of Foreign Assets maintained for the account of the Portfolios may be effected in accordance with the customary established securities trading or processing practices and procedures in the country or market in which the transaction occurs, including, without limitation, delivering Foreign Assets to the purchaser thereof or to a dealer therefor (or an agent for such purchaser or dealer) with the expectation of receiving later payment for such Foreign Assets from such purchaser or dealer. The Custodian shall provide to each Board the information with respect to custody and settlement practices in countries in which the Custodian employs a Foreign Sub-Custodian described on Schedule C hereto at the time or times set forth on such Schedule. The Custodian may revise Schedule C from time to time, provided that no such revision shall result in a Board being provided with substantively less information than had been previously provided hereunder.

  • Alternative Credit Support Election (a) The Sellers may elect to effect a change in the calculation of the Class Percentage with respect to Finance Charge Collections during the Early Accumulation Period or the Amortization Period, as set forth in the definition of "Class Percentage," and increase the Available Class B Credit Enhancement Amount, by making an Alternative Credit Support Election. An Alternative Credit Support Election may be made as follows:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!