Retention Indexing/Ratings Sample Clauses

Retention Indexing/Ratings. Each employee will be assigned by the Company a comparative rating as follows, giving consideration to each employee's competence, diligence, and demonstrated usable capabilities based upon the employee’s current performance and a review of the employee’s previous performance. The individual rating will be referred to as a "retention rating," and the process of applying these ratings and compiling them in order of rating, as retention indexing. Retention ratings assigned to employees prior to the execution date of this Agreement will remain in effect until changed under provisions of this Article.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (14)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Retention Indexing/Ratings. Each employee will be assigned by the 5 Company a comparative rating as follows, giving consideration to each employee’s 6 competence, diligence and demonstrated usable capabilities based upon the employee’s 7 current performance and a review of the employee’s previous performance. 8 The individual rating will be referred to as a “retention rating,” and the process of applying 10 these ratings and compiling them in order of rating, as retention indexing. 11 Retention ratings assigned to employees prior to the execution date of this Agreement will 13 remain in effect until changed under the provisions of this Article. 14
Sample 1
Retention Indexing/Ratings. Each employee will be assigned by the Company a comparative 53 rating as follows, giving consideration to each employee’s competence, diligence and demonstrated usable 54 capabilities based upon the employee’s current performance and a review of the employee’s previous 55 performance. 56 1 The individual rating will be referred to as a “retention rating,” and the process of applying these ratings 2 and compiling them in order of rating, as retention indexing. 3
Sample 1

Related to Retention Indexing/Ratings

  • Evaluation Rating The final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a teacher based on the holistic review of all Evaluation Factors, observed during the Evaluation Cycle. The rating shall be “accomplished”, “skilled”, “developing”, or “ineffective”. The final rating shall not be weighted in such a way that one (1) domain or component of the evaluation system has a higher importance than another, except that any area marked N/A shall not negatively impact the evaluation rating.

  • Insurance Carrier Rating Coverages provided by Contractor must be underwritten by an insurance company deemed acceptable to the State of Washington’s Office of Risk Management. Insurance coverage shall be provided by companies authorized to do business within the State of Washington and rated A- Class VII or better in the most recently published edition of Best’s Insurance Rating. Enterprise Services reserves the right to reject all or any insurance carrier(s) with an unacceptable financial rating.

  • Performance Rating Describes the Educator’s performance on each performance standard and overall. There shall be four performance ratings:  Exemplary: the Educator’s performance consistently and significantly exceeds the requirements of a standard or overall. The rating of exemplary on a standard indicates that practice significantly exceeds proficient and could serve as a model of practice on that standard district-wide.  Proficient: the Educator’s performance fully and consistently meets the requirements of a standard or overall. Proficient practice is understood to be fully satisfactory.

  • Staffing Levels To the extent legislative appropriations and PIN authorizations allow, safe staffing levels will be maintained in all institutions where employees have patient, client, inmate or student care responsibilities. In July of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of each agency will, upon request, meet with the Union, to hear the employees’ views regarding staffing levels. In August of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of Budget and Management will, upon request, meet with the Union to hear the employees’ views regarding the Governor’s budget request.

  • Credit Rating With respect to the Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor, its senior unsecured, unsubordinated long-term debt rating, not supported by third party credit enhancement, and if such debt is no longer rated, then the corporate or long-term issuer rating of Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor.

  • Insurance Company Rating The required insurance must be written by a company approved to do business in the State or Texas with a financial standing of at least an A- rating, as reflected in Best’s insurance ratings or by a similar rating system recognized within the insurance industry at the time the policy is issued.

  • Ratings No “nationally recognized statistical rating organization” as such term is defined for purposes of Rule 436(g)(2) (i) has imposed (or has informed the Company that it is considering imposing) any condition (financial or otherwise) on the Company’s retaining any rating assigned to the Company or any securities of the Company or (ii) has indicated to the Company that it is considering any of the actions described in Section 7(c)(ii) hereof.

  • Reporting of Total Compensation of Subrecipient Executives I. Applicability and what to report. Unless you are exempt as provided in paragraph [4.]of this award term, for each first-tier subrecipient under this award, you shall report the names and total compensation of each of the subrecipient's five most highly compensated executives for the subrecipient's preceding completed fiscal year, if—

  • Industry Ratings The City will only accept coverage from an insurance carrier who offers proof that it:

  • Level III In the event the grievance is not resolved in Level II, the decision rendered may be appealed to the School Board, provided such an appeal is made in writing within ten (10) days after receipt of the decision in Level II. If a grievance is properly appealed to the School Board, the School District shall hear the grievance within twenty (20) days after the receipt of the appeal. Within twenty (20) days after the meeting the School Board shall issue its decision in writing to the parties involved. At the option of the School Board, a committee or representative(s) of the School District may be designated by the School Board to hear the appeal at this level, and report its findings and recommendations to the School District. The School District shall then render its decision.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.