Record of Evaluation Sample Clauses

Record of Evaluation. The parties agree that an effective evaluation process requires meaningful, ongoing, two- way communication. To facilitate this process, the parties agree that each Educator shall have a Record of Evaluation maintained as part of his/ her personnel file, pursuant to Article IV I. All evaluation documents shall remain confidential as personnel records of each member of the bargaining unit. Each Educator’s Record of Evaluation shall consist of three parts: 1) all forms and documents used or contained in the evaluation process; 2) Evaluator-supplied evidence; and 3) Educator-supplied evidence. Standard forms shall include all relevant forms in Appendix C-1. The other components are described below.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Record of Evaluation. Documented collection of evidence pertaining to the Educator’s performance during the evaluation cycle consisting of three parts:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Record of Evaluation. The parties agree that an effective evaluation process requires meaningful, ongoing, two-way communication. To facilitate this process, the parties agree that each Educator shall have a Record of Evaluation maintained as part of hisIher Teacher files/personnel folder, pursuant to Article VI – Working Conditions, Section 34. All evaluation documents contained in the Record of Evaluation shall remain confidential as personnel records for each member of the bargaining unit, and will not be considered a public record per the Privacy Exemption under the Massachusetts Public Records Law, M.G.L. c. 4, §7(26)(c). Each Educator's Record of Evaluation shall consist of three (3) parts:
Sample 1
Record of Evaluation. The parties agree that an effective evaluation process requires meaningful, ongoing, two-way communication. To facilitate this process, the parties agree that each Paraprofessional shall have a Record of Evaluation maintained as part of his/her Personnel File, pursuant to Article XX – Paraprofessional Evaluations/Personnel Files. Each Employee's Record of Evaluation shall consist of the Paraprofessional Evaluation Form and all other documentation (including but not limited to e-mails and other forms) used in the evaluation process. All evaluation documents contained in the Record of Evaluation shall remain confidential as personnel records for each member of the bargaining unit, and will not be considered a public record per the Privacy Exemption under the Massachusetts Public Records Law, M.G.L. c. 4, §7(26)(c).
Sample 1
Record of Evaluation a. The parties agree that an effective evaluation process requires meaningful, ongoing, two- way communication. To facilitate this process, the parties agree that each Educator shall have a Record of Evaluation maintained as part of his/her Teacher files/personnel folder (and the equivalent in the TeachPoint System), pursuant to Article 26 –Personnel Practices. All evaluation documents contained in the Record of Evaluation shall remain confidential as personnel records for each member of the bargaining unit, and will not be considered a public record per the Privacy Exemption under the Massachusetts Public Records Law, M.G.L. c. 4, §7(26)(c). Each Educator's Record of Evaluation shall consist of three (3) parts:  All forms and documents used or contained in the evaluation process (or the equivalent in the TeachPoint System).  Evaluator-supplied evidence.  Educator-supplied evidence.
Sample 1
Record of Evaluation. The parties agree that an effective evaluation process requires meaningful, ongoing, two-way communication. To facilitate this process, the parties agree that each Educator shall have a Record of Evaluation maintained as part of hisIher Teacher files/personnel folder, pursuant to Section 4.11. All evaluation documents contained in the Record of Evaluation shall remain confidential as personnel records for each member of the bargaining unit, and will not be considered a public record per the Privacy Exemption under the Massachusetts Public Records Law, M.G.L. c. 4, §7(26)(c). Each Educator's Record of Evaluation shall consist of three (3) parts:  All forms and documents used or contained in the evaluation process;  Evaluator-supplied evidence; and  Educator-supplied evidence. Standard forms shall include all relevant forms in Appendix F. The other components are described below.
Sample 1

Related to Record of Evaluation

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Purpose of Evaluation 10.1.1 It is recognized that a system of evaluation is essential to assist Unit Members in developing competency and realizing their potential. It is further recognized that information gathered through such a system will enable decisions that measure a Unit Member’s performance in a just and equitable manner.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Formal Evaluation All formal evaluations of personnel shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee concerned by an administrator or supervisor of the District.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 11.1 The evaluation of the Employee’s performance will form the basis for rewarding outstanding performance or correcting unacceptable performance.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is experienced and knowledgeable in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, accounting, marketing, land, engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Subject Property and value thereof.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.