Randomness extraction Sample Clauses

Randomness extraction. Properties of randomized algorithms and cryptographic protocols are very often proven under the assumption of having an access to a source of true random data. Replacing it with a data source that produces more pre- dictable output or, in a worse case, with a source that is influenced by an attacker, may lead to the loss of these properties. Nowadays, pseudo- random number generators are broadly used as randomness providers. Usually, they employ some computational problem, that is believed to be hard, however, this still means they are secure only from the computational perspective. This need of randomness is very unfavourable, taking into account that contemporary computers are built using deterministically behaving hard- xxxx. Therefore, randomness itself has to be brought mostly by some ad- ditional hardware, most likely based on the phenomena producing out- put containing some entropy. Among such devices, we can count either purpose-built hardware measuring some physical phenomena (e.g. thermal noise, photo-electric effect) or input devices, intended originally for user interaction, utilized in this way. Fortunately, mobile devices offer a wide range of hardware that belongs into the latter category. The output of a randomness source often contains only a limited amount of entropy. The exact (lower) limit should be determined for every source to inform us about how much of the original information we can use in prac- xxxx. Also, the overall properties of the source need to be examined, with the aim to design an algorithm producing true randomness from the source output. This is, in fact, a point where we employ randomness extractors. This chapter has introductory character into the area of randomness ex- tractors in order to clarify the given terms. Presented results were chosen according to the contribution for our thesis. For a more extensive overview, the reader is referred to [33, 32].
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Randomness extraction. Let a random variable X be given. An extractor is a randomized func- tion which uses the randomness inherent in X to obtain a nearly uniform bit string. Allowing the function to be randomized means that it has ac- cess to additional uniform randomness, called seed, and we expect that the concatenation of the seed and the output of the extractor is close to uniform (this implies that the extractor cannot just output the seed).

Related to Randomness extraction

  • Synchronization, Commissioning and Commercial Operation 4.1.1 The Power Producer shall give at least thirty (30) days written notice to the SLDC and GUVNL, of the date on which it intends to synchronize the Power Project to the Grid System.

  • Scaling “Scaling,” as used herein, involves:

  • Library CONTRACTOR shall provide an inmate law library in compliance with Rule 33-501.301, F.A.C., FDC’s Policy 501.301, and ACA Standards.

  • STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM If the maximum amount payable to Contractor under this Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this section shall apply. Contractor agrees to be governed by and comply with the provisions of §§00-000-000, 00-000-000, 00-000-000, and 00- 000-000, C.R.S. regarding the monitoring of vendor performance and the reporting of contract information in the State’s contract management system (“Contract Management System” or “CMS”). Contractor’s performance shall be subject to evaluation and review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, Colorado statutes governing CMS, and State Fiscal Rules and State Controller policies.

  • Random Drug Testing All employees covered by this Agreement shall be subject to random drug testing in accordance with Appendix D.

  • Medical Verification The Town may require medical verification of an employee’s absence if the Town perceives the employee is abusing sick leave or has used an excessive amount of sick leave. The Town may require medical verification of an employee’s absence to verify that the employee is able to return to work with or without restrictions.

  • System Logging The system must maintain an automated audit trail which can 20 identify the user or system process which initiates a request for PHI COUNTY discloses to 21 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY, 22 or which alters such PHI. The audit trail must be date and time stamped, must log both successful and 23 failed accesses, must be read only, and must be restricted to authorized users. If such PHI is stored in a 24 database, database logging functionality must be enabled. Audit trail data must be archived for at least 3 25 years after occurrence.

  • Quality Management System Supplier hereby undertakes, warrants and confirms, and will ensue same for its subcontractors, to remain certified in accordance with ISO 9001 standard or equivalent. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the Supplier shall, if so instructed by ISR, provide evidence of such certifications. In any event, Supplier must notify ISR, in writing, in the event said certification is suspended and/or canceled and/or not continued.

  • Validation ‌ Within one (1) year after the effective date of this contract, the Agency shall submit this contract to a court of competent jurisdiction for determination of its validity by a proceeding in mandamus or other appropriate proceeding or action, which proceeding or action shall be diligently prosecuted to final decree or judgment. In the event that this contract is determined to be invalid by such final decree or judgment, the State shall make all reasonable efforts to obtain validating legislation at the next session of the Legislature empowered to consider such legislation, and within six (6) months after the close of such session, if such legislation shall have been enacted, the Agency shall submit this contract to a court of competent jurisdiction for redetermination of its validity by appropriate proceeding or action, which proceeding or action shall be diligently prosecuted to final decree or judgment.

  • Screening 3.13.1 Refuse containers located outside the building shall be fully screened from adjacent properties and from streets by means of opaque fencing or masonry walls with suitable landscaping.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.