Primary Findings Sample Clauses

Primary Findings. ‌ During their interviews, PAD organizational stakeholders and pilot area residents expressed their level of support, involvement, and investment in the initiative, described the nature of institutional relationships they engage in through PAD, and shared perceptions on the benefits of PAD for the neighborhood and/or Atlanta. Stakeholder Characterization of the Pre-Arrest Diversion Initiative‌ Stakeholders expressed overarching support for PAD. PAD is appreciated for its holistic, comprehensive, and innovative approach to ensuring that individuals committing crimes associated with a circumstance are best served through service provision instead of incarceration. Elected officials such as the “chief of police and Mayor Bottoms have both vocally been very supportive of pre-arrest diversion,” contributing to spreading community interest in PAD and inspiring a willingness to consider alternative approaches to law enforcement. Community-wide support for PAD also stems from perceived success in aiding the community, as explained by the police commander: “anything that reduces people going to jail, and shows that you're doing everything you can to care for the people in the community is always gonna be positive.” In addition to support from politicians and entire communities, the Xxxxxx County Chief Strategic Officer reports: “It's been my impression dealing with both sides that there is a huge amount of support for the Pre-Arrest Diversion program on both sides of the criminal justice system, both the prosecution and the defense.” PAD stakeholders believe in the initiative’s mission, share pride in its progress thus far, express excitement for achievements in the lives of participants, and look forward to observing long-term benefits of PAD reflected in Atlanta’s ongoing criminal justice reform efforts. PAD’s service-oriented approach and adherence to harm-reduction strategies aligns with ongoing criminal justice reform efforts. At all levels in government there is a growing collective understanding of the long-standing and pervasive issues rendering our present criminal justice system expensive, yet ineffective. PAD highlights the need for comprehensive streamlined services and fills gaps through extensive provider coordination in the meantime. As aspects of harm-reduction become more frequently integrated into interventions addressing issues ranging from STI prevention to substance abuse treatment, many funding agencies have adopted guidelines preferring propo...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Primary Findings

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the LHIN has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

  • Statistical Sampling Documentation a. A copy of the printout of the random numbers generated by the “Random Numbers” function of the statistical sampling software used by the IRO.

  • Limitations on Reverse Engineering, Decompilation, and Disassembly You may not reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the Software, except and only to the extent that such activity is expressly permitted by applicable law notwithstanding this limitation.

  • What Are the Qualifications for Charitable Donations The Pension Protection Act of 2006 allows Xxxx XXX holders who are RMD age or older at the time of a distribution to annually exclude qualified charitable distribution amounts up to $100,000 per year from gross income. The provision was made permanent by the PATH Act of 2015. A qualified charitable distribution must be made payable directly to the qualified charity as described in Section 170(b) of the Internal Revenue Code. Distributions from SEP or SIMPLE IRAs do not qualify for this type of designation.

  • Know-How Necessary for the Business The Intellectual Property Rights are all those necessary for the operation of the Company’s businesses as it is currently conducted or as represented, in writing, to the Purchasers to be conducted. The Company is the owner of all right, title, and interest in and to each of the Intellectual Property Rights, free and clear of all liens, security interests, charges, encumbrances, equities, and other adverse claims, and has the right to use all of the Intellectual Property Rights. To the Company’s knowledge, no employee of the Company has entered into any contract that restricts or limits in any way the scope or type of work in which the employee may be engaged or requires the employee to transfer, assign, or disclose information concerning his work to anyone other than of the Company.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the Fall semester.

  • Investment Analysis and Implementation In carrying out its obligations under Section 1 hereof, the Advisor shall:

  • Product Changes Vocera shall have the right, in its absolute discretion, without liability to End User, to update to provide new functionality or otherwise change the design of any Product or to discontinue the manufacture or sale of any Product. Vocera shall notify End User at least 90 days prior to the delivery of any Product which incorporates a change that adversely affects form, fit or function (“Material Change”). Vocera shall also notify End User at least 90 days prior to the discontinuance of manufacture of any Product. Notification will be made as soon as reasonably practical for changes associated with regulatory or health and safety issues.

  • Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the Engineer for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurements of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the Engineer of the Engineer's obligations under this contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.