Performance assessment indicators Sample Clauses

Performance assessment indicators. To determine the operational value of COBACORE for each user group and for the whole the following performance assessment indicators will be specified: - Collaboration and information sharing within and between user groups (e.g. community, NGO, government); - Acquisition and analysis of information about needs, damage and capacities; - Matching of needs and damage with capacities within and between user- groups; - Availability and quality of data sources used for needs, damage and capacity assessment and matching; - Degree of fit of built-in procedures with current practises of user-groups; and - Usefulness and usability of COBACORE interfaces for users from each user- group. Three kinds of assessments are combined as the basis for feedback and refinement of COBACORE features: - Self-assessment of participants from all user groups and groups 1 and 2 of the evaluation groups: usefulness and usability of COBACORE features for recovery activities; match with procedures or working habits; added value of collaboration and information sharing; generalisability of functionality to other scenario’s, suggestions about additions and improvements. - Observations by experts (group 3): effectiveness and efficiency of damage, needs and capacity assessments; needs-capacity matching; information sharing and collaboration and recovery as a whole, generalizability of functionality to other scenarios. - Assessments of COBACORE members: Additional performance assessment indicators. The reactions will be caught on forms – which represent questionnaires based on support claims and performance assessment indicators and are formulated beforehand by representatives of all work packages with the aid of WP5 team members. This way the evaluation experience will produce demand driven feedback to all work packages and allow assessing the overall operational value of COBACORE for all user groups and evaluation groups.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Performance assessment indicators. In this final evaluation COBACORE is tested with user groups and on scene and off scene teams in two countries. These teams are not used to working together in these circumstances and do not share the same national framework for response and recovery. We evaluate the potential of COBACORE to close information sharing and collaboration gaps between the two countries. To demonstrate the operational value of COBACORE the following performance assessment indicators will be specified: - Collaboration and information sharing within and between user groups on two sides of the Netherlands and German border (e.g. community, NGO, government); - Acquisition and analysis of information about needs, damage and capacities by user-groups on two sides of the Netherlands and German border; - Matching of needs and damage with capacities within and between user-groups on two sides of the Netherlands and German border. - Availability and quality of data sources used for needs, damage and capacity assessment and matching by user groups on two sides of the Netherlands and German border. - Degree of fit of built-in procedures with current practises of user-groups on two sides of the Netherlands and German border - Usefulness and usability of COBACORE interfaces for users from each user group on two sides of the Netherlands and German border In this stage of development support claims of COBACORE functionality is fully specified. The implementation of functionality has been tested. As a result the performance assessment indicators can be made SMART and demonstrative.
Sample 1

Related to Performance assessment indicators

  • Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of –

  • Performance Indicators The HSP’s delivery of the Services will be measured by the following Indicators, Targets and where applicable Performance Standards. In the following table: n/a meanç ‘not-appIicabIe’, that there iç no defined Performance Standard for the indicator for the applicable year. tbd means a Target, and a Performance Standard, if applicable, will be determined during the applicable year. INDICATOR CATEGORY INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD Organizational Health and Financial Indicators Debt Service Coverage Ratio (P) 1 c1 Total Margin (P) 0 cO Coordination and Access Indicators Percent Resident Days – Long Stay (E) n/a n/a Wait Time from LHIN Determination of Eligibility to LTC Home Response (M) n/a n/a Long-Term Care Home Refusal Rate (E) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2/3 INDICATOR CATEGORY Quality and Resident Safety Indicators INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator Percentage of Residents Who Fell in the Last 30 days (M) 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD n/a n/a Percentage of Residents Whose Pressure Ulcer Worsened (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents on Antipsychotics Without a Diagnosis of Psychosis (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents in Daily Physical Restraints (M) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2.0 LHIN-Specific Performance Obligations 3/3

  • CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE AUDIT The Contractor shall allow the Authorized User to assess Contractor’s performance by providing any materials requested in the Authorized User Agreement (e.g., page load times, response times, uptime, and fail over time). The Authorized User may perform this Contractor performance audit with a third party at its discretion, at the Authorized User’s expense. The Contractor shall perform an independent audit of its Data Centers, at least annually, at Contractor expense. The Contractor will provide a data owner facing audit report upon request by the Authorized User. The Contractor shall identify any confidential, trade secret, or proprietary information in accordance with Appendix B, Section 9(a), Confidential/Trade Secret Materials.

  • Performance Measure The specific representation of a process or outcome that is relevant to the assessment of performance; it is quantifiable and can be documented

  • Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 5.6.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 10.1 The Supplier shall at all times during the Framework Period comply with the Key Performance Indicators and achieve the KPI Targets set out in Part B of Framework Schedule 2 (Goods and/or Services and Key Performance Indicators).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.