Assessment procedure. In 2006, the Examining Boards and Board of the Education Institute decided that all WU Chair Groups have to use the standard assessment form for theses and appoint two examiners. The Chair Group can adjust the weight (percentages) of the assessment criteria on the Excel-form. The student should be informed about this weighting (item 9 of this agreement).
Assessment procedure. Student assessments shall be administered by the Department Head or her/his designee. Individual Faculty Members may assist and cooperate in the administration of the student assessment but a Faculty Member shall not be required to do so involuntarily. In no case may the Faculty Member, when assisting in the administration of the student assessment, administer the instrument in her/his own class. The Faculty Member will leave the classroom when the instrument is administered to her/his class.
Assessment procedure. In 2006, the Examining Boards and Board of the Education Institute decided that all WU chair groups have to use the standard assessment form for theses and appoint the examiner and a second evaluator. During the examination the examiner (or his/her WU representative) and at least one other WU supervisor/evaluator must be present. Within the Food Science cluster, all chair groups are using the same weight (percentages) of the assessment criteria and the same criteria within an assessment cluster on the Excel-form. The student should be informed about this weighting (item 9 of this agreement). 1 This can be the second supervisor.
Assessment procedure. Each year, in accordance with the criteria it establishes, the academic committee of the doctoral programme will assess each candidate’s progress on his or her doctoral thesis research plan, as well as the candidate’s activity report and reports issued by the thesis supervisor, the co-supervisor and academic tutor, if applicable. At least one of these annual assessments will include a public presentation and defence of the research plan and work done before a committee composed of three PhD holders, which will be conducted in the manner determined by each academic committee. The reading and public defence take place on the University's or the collaborating entity's premises and may not be carried out by videoconference. Assessment results will be communicated to the doctoral candidate within one month. Assessments will be carried out by the academic committee in accordance with the academic calendar for doctoral studies.
Assessment procedure. A candidate for a doctorate degree must pass a series of assessments in the order of the proposal of research concept and plan (hereinafter referred to as the “Proposal Review”), preliminary evaluation (hereinafter referred to as the “Interim Review”), and Thesis Review and Final Oral Examination (hereinafter referred to as the “Final Review”), as required by the Graduate School.
Assessment procedure. By August 1 of each year, prior to the adoption of an annual budget for the following year, the Board shall determine the amount of contribution by each participating county according to the assessment formula in Section 3 herein. The budget shall account for all revenue and expenses of each function of the Board under this Agreement. The contribution of each county shall be a credit for the county making the contribution. If, in any year, the amount of any contribution exceeds that estimated as each county’s share toward the total annual cost, the excess shall be allocated in such manner as to reduce each county’s contribution in accordance with the assessment formula herein. If, after the adoption of an annual budget, it appears that a deficit is imminent in that the amount of any share is incorrect or insufficient, the Board may, at a regular or special meeting, adjust the budget to the extent required for the exercise of its powers and the accomplishment of its purposes. Such additional contributions shall be assessed as provided in Section 3 herein. Hennepin County will be assessed based on its entire population as provided in Section 3 herein; therefore, the City of Minneapolis shall not be assessed for Board functions except for administrative costs related to regional radio board functions as provided in Section 8 herein.
Assessment procedure. Selection Panel: Applications will be considered by a Selection Panel, which will shortlist and interview candidates.
Assessment procedure. The evaluation of the final demonstrator in the operational setting will consist of four evaluation stages:
Assessment procedure. The Council, a Partner State, an interested physical or moral person and a non-governmental organization with residence in the EAC, which considers that a tax measure taken by a Partner State is in breach of the Code of conduct, may request the Committee to assess whether that measure is harmful under the Code of conduct. The Committee may also, on its own initiative, undertake to assess whether a Partner State’s tax measure is in breach of the Code of conduct and determine whether that measure is harmful within the scope of the Code of conduct. The Committee shall conduct a preliminary procedure to examine the admissibility of the claim and the measure’s potential harmfulness. If the claim is admissible and the measure is potentially harmful, the Committee shall notify the concerned state and invite it to submit its observations. The Committee shall decide whether the measure in question is harmful and, if so recommends the ways forward. In the event of disagreement on the outcome of the Committee, the matter may be referred to the EACJ for a final binding judgment, following the same procedure as for referral to the Code of Conduct Committee. The EACJ judgment, which where necessary may include sanctions, shall be binding on the Partner State concerned as to the actions to be taken to eliminate the harmful measure.
Assessment procedure. 7.3.1.1. Step 1: Eligibility check will be done to determine if the Entry complies with the submission requirements and is technically and visually completed.
