Non-Economic Hotels Sample Clauses

Non-Economic Hotels. If the Gross Revenues of any Hotel are insufficient to pay the Owner’s Priority for such Hotel in full during any two (2) out of four (4) consecutive Years, each of Manager and the relevant Owner shall, upon thirty (30) days notice to the other, be entitled to designate such Hotel a “Non-Economic Hotel.” Notwithstanding the foregoing, Manager and Owners shall not be entitled to designate Hotels for which the Invested Capital in the aggregate would exceed twenty percent (20%) of Aggregate Invested Capital and further provided for purposes of this Section 5.01 only, Aggregate Invested Capital shall be determined without giving effect to the termination of the Management Agreement of a Non-Economic Hotel and without reduction for proceeds from the sale, or deemed sale, of any Non-Economic Hotel. The party designating a Hotel as a Non-Economic Hotel (“Marketing Party”) shall market such Non-Economic Hotel for sale and any costs incurred by the Marketing Party or any other Person in connection with such marketing activities and the sale of such Hotel shall be paid out of the net proceeds of such sale. The relevant Owner, Landlord and Manager, as the case may be, shall cooperate with the Marketing Party in compiling any relevant information, preparing marketing materials and otherwise in connection with the sale of a Non-Economic Hotel.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Non-Economic Hotels. (a) Manager shall be entitled to designate as a Non-Economic Hotel any Hotel for which, in each of any three (3) consecutive full Fiscal Years during the Term, the Operating Profit is less than the sum of (i) amounts to be funded to the Reserve Account pursuant to Section 5.2(a) on account of such Hotel, plus (ii) Owner's Fixed Priority attributable to such Hotel pursuant to Exhibit C hereto; provided, however, that the number of Hotels designated as Non-Economic Hotels under this Agreement (other than those with respect to which such designation has been withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, but including those which have been sold pursuant to this Section 2.7) shall not exceed three (3). If subsequent to a Hotel being designated as a Non-Economic Hotel but prior to its sale pursuant to this Section 2.7, the Operating Profit of such Hotel for any Fiscal Year shall exceed the sum of amounts to be funded to the Reserve Account pursuant to Section 5.2(a) on account of such Hotel, plus the portion of the Owner's Fixed Priority for such Fiscal Year so attributable to such Hotel, such designation shall be deemed withdrawn; provided, however, if Manager is then negotiating a sale of such Hotel to a third-party, such designation shall not be deemed withdrawn for a period of three (3) months.
Non-Economic Hotels. Section 2.6(e) is amended such that an Affiliate Hotel may also be designated a Non-Economic Hotel in accordance with and subject to the terms of Section 2.6(e) of the Management Agreement no earlier than fifth anniversary of the Effective Date for such Affiliate Hotel; provided, however, if an Affiliate Hotel is designated as a Non-Economic Hotel and the compliance with the provisions of this Agreement as to a Non-Economic Hotel triggers withdrawal liability related to any multi-employer plan under any collective bargaining agreement or causes Manager to incur costs to comply with the requirements of Section 4204 of ERISA with respect thereto, then Owner shall pay for such withdrawal liability or compliance costs (or reimburse Manager for the same) and the net proceeds of such sale (or the price of the third party offer received in the context of a Retained Hotel) shall be reduced by the amount of such withdrawal liability or such compliance costs for purposes of calculating the reduction in Owner’s First Priority and Owner’s Second Priority. As clarification, except as otherwise hereinabove provided, all withdrawal liability or any compliance costs triggered under any multi-employer plan or collective bargaining agreement shall be considered Operating Costs.
Non-Economic Hotels. Either Owner or Manager shall be entitled to designate as a Non-Economic Hotel any Hotel the Gross Revenues of which, in two (2) out of any three (3) consecutive full Fiscal Years during the Term, are insufficient to pay the sum of all Operating Costs and, beginning January 1, 2014, all amounts to be funded to the Reserve Account pursuant to Section 5.2 (Reserve Account) with respect to such Hotel, provided the number of additional Hotels which may be designated as Non-Economic Hotels shall not exceed twenty five (25). Upon designation as a Non-Economic Hotel, such Hotel shall be marketed by Owner for third party sale as though it were a Designated Hotel pursuant to the processes in Sections 2.6(a) and (b) (Designated Hotels and Sale Process). If Owner receives a bona fide third party offer(s) it does not wish to accept, Owner shall retain such Non-Economic Hotel free and clear of any contractual obligations of any franchise or management agreement from Manager or its Affiliates. If Owner retains such Non-Economic Hotel, effective on the last day of the twelfth calendar month following the date such Hotel was designated as a Non-Economic Hotel, such Hotel shall be treated as having been purchased by Owner as a Retained Hotel under Section 2.6(c)(Retained Hotels) (Retained Hotels), including the same reduction in Owner’s First Priority and Owner’s Second Priority as provided in Section 2.6(c) (Retained Hotels). If Owner does not receive any offer within twelve (12) calendar months of the date such Hotel was designated a Non-Economic Hotel, it shall give notice to Manager and Manager shall have the right to purchase such Hotel at the original cost to Owner of such Hotel, by notice given to Owner within thirty (30) days after the last day of the twelfth calendar month following the date such Hotel was designated a Non-Economic Hotel. If Manager does not so elect, Owner may elect either to have such Hotel treated as having been purchased by Owner as a Retained Hotel under Section 2.6(c) (Retained Hotels), provided the reductions in Owner’s First Priority and Owner’s Second Priority shall be as provided in Section 2.6(c) (Retained Hotels), calculated based upon the original cost to Owner of such Hotel after reduction for any amounts actually expended and any costs which would reasonably have been expected to have been expended if the sale had been consummated, or to treat such Hotel as an Unsold Hotel under Section 2.6(h)(Unsold Hotels).

Related to Non-Economic Hotels

  • Green Economy/Carbon Footprint a) The Supplier/Service Provider has in its bid provided Transnet with an understanding of the Supplier’s/Service Provider’s position with regard to issues such as waste disposal, recycling and energy conservation.

  • Purchaser Bears Economic Risk The Purchaser has substantial experience in evaluating and investing in private placement transactions of securities in companies similar to the Company so that it is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of its investment in the Company and has the capacity to protect its own interests. The Purchaser must bear the economic risk of this investment until the Securities are sold pursuant to: (i) an effective registration statement under the Securities Act; or (ii) an exemption from registration is available with respect to such sale.

  • European Economic Area Each Underwriter severally, but not jointly, represents and agrees that it has not offered, sold or otherwise made available and will not offer, sell or otherwise make available any Offered Notes which are the subject of the Prospectus to any “retail investor” in the European Economic Area. For the purposes of this provision:

  • Economic Sanctions, Etc The Company will not, and will not permit any Controlled Entity to (a) become (including by virtue of being owned or controlled by a Blocked Person), own or control a Blocked Person or (b) directly or indirectly have any investment in or engage in any dealing or transaction (including any investment, dealing or transaction involving the proceeds of the Notes) with any Person if such investment, dealing or transaction (i) would cause any holder or any affiliate of such holder to be in violation of, or subject to sanctions under, any law or regulation applicable to such holder, or (ii) is prohibited by or subject to sanctions under any U.S. Economic Sanctions Laws.

  • Campaign Contribution Restrictions For all State contracts as defined in C.G.S. § 9-612(g) the authorized signatory to this Contract expressly acknowledges receipt of the State Elections Enforcement Commission’s (“SEEC”) notice advising state contractors of state campaign contribution and solicitation prohibitions, and will inform its principles of the contents of the notice. See Form reproduced and inserted below.

  • Cooperation with Economic Studies If ICANN initiates or commissions an economic study on the impact or functioning of new generic top-­‐level domains on the Internet, the DNS or related matters, Registry Operator shall reasonably cooperate with such study, including by delivering to ICANN or its designee conducting such study all data related to the operation of the TLD reasonably necessary for the purposes of such study requested by ICANN or its designee, provided, that Registry Operator may withhold (a) any internal analyses or evaluations prepared by Registry Operator with respect to such data and (b) any data to the extent that the delivery of such data would be in violation of applicable law. Any data delivered to ICANN or its designee pursuant to this Section 2.15 that is appropriately marked as confidential (as required by Section 7.15) shall be treated as Confidential Information of Registry Operator in accordance with Section 7.15, provided that, if ICANN aggregates and makes anonymous such data, ICANN or its designee may disclose such data to any third party. Following completion of an economic study for which Registry Operator has provided data, ICANN will destroy all data provided by Registry Operator that has not been aggregated and made anonymous.

  • Economic Sanctions None of the Company, the Sponsor, any non-independent director or officer or, to the knowledge of the Company, any independent director or director nominee, agent or affiliate of the Company is currently subject to any sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Treasury Department (“OFAC”) or any similar sanctions imposed by any other body, governmental or other, to which any of such persons is subject (collectively, “other economic sanctions”); and the Company will not directly or indirectly use the proceeds of the Offering, or lend, contribute or otherwise make available such proceeds to any subsidiary, joint venture partner or other person or entity, for the purpose of financing the activities of any person currently subject to any sanctions administered by OFAC or other economic sanctions.

  • Substantial Economic Effect It is the intent of the Partners that the allocations of Profit and Loss under this Agreement have substantial economic effect (or be consistent with the Partners’ interests in the Partnership in the case of the allocation of losses attributable to nonrecourse debt) within the meaning of Section 704(b) of the Code as interpreted by the Regulations promulgated pursuant thereto. Article 5 and other relevant provisions of this Agreement shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with such intent.

  • Campaign Contribution Restriction For all State contracts as defined in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 9-612(g)(1) having a value in a calendar year of $50,000 or more or a combination or series of such agreements or contracts having a value of $100,000 or more, the authorized signatory to this Contract expressly acknowledges receipt of the State Elections Enforcement Commission's notice advising state contractors of state campaign contribution and solicitation prohibitions, and will inform its principals of the contents of the notice, as set forth in “Notice to Executive Branch State Contractors and Prospective State Contractors of Campaign Contribution and Solicitation Limitations,” attached as Exhibit C.

  • Certification Regarding Prohibition of Boycotting Israel (Tex Gov. Code 2271) If (a) Vendor is not a sole proprietorship; (b) Vendor has ten (10) or more full-time employees; and (c) this Agreement or any agreement with a TIPS Member under this procurement has value of $100,000 or more, the following certification shall apply; otherwise, this certification is not required. Vendor certifies, where applicable, that neither the Vendor, nor any affiliate, subsidiary, or parent company of Vendor, if any, boycotts Israel, and Vendor agrees that Vendor and Vendor Companies will not boycott Israel during the term of this Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, the term “boycott” shall mean and include refusing to deal with, terminating business activities with, or otherwise taking any action that is intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations with Israel, or with a person or entity doing business in Israel or in an Israeli-controlled territory but does not include an action made for ordinary business purposes. When applicable, does Vendor certify? Yes

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.