Main hypothesis Sample Clauses

Main hypothesis. Hypothesis 1: "User effect" "The most acceptable (useful + easy to use) HR sensor is dependant of the people features". More precisely, we suggest that different features have a significant effect on device acceptability as: - The people category - The health - The amount of PA - The type of PA More explanations about the features that might have an effect on device acceptability will allow us to advise future PRECIOUS users to use a certain device. Hypothesis 2: "Task effect" "The most acceptable HR sensor is not the same depending on the task we measure". More precisely, we supposed that the appropriate device is not the same for: - Sleeping - Practising PA - Measuring stress at work The details about which sensor is the most acceptable for which activity could allow us to help future PRECIOUS users to choose the sensors depending on the task they want to monitor. Hypothesis 3: "Device effect on reliability" "Electrodes (Firstbeat: FB) data are perceived as more reliable than chest belt (SUUNTO: SU) and watch (PULSE ON: PU) data, and chest belt (SU) data is perceived as more reliable than watch (PU) data”. This hypothesis will be answered with the following question from the questionnaire: Generally speaking, data from the [concerned sensor] seems RELIABLE The data I gathered with the [concerned sensor] seems RELIABLE to manage my PHYSICAL ACTIVITY / STRESS AT WORK / SLEEPING Hypothesis 4: "Device effect on ease of use" "Watch (PU) device is perceived as easier to use than chest belt (SU) and electrode (FB) devices, and chest belt (SU) data is perceived as easier to use than electrodes (FB) device”. This hypothesis will be answered with the following question from the questionnaire: The [concerned sensor] is easy to install Most of the time I forgot that I am wearing the [concerned sensor] Does the [concerned sensor] add obligations in the daily life? * Do you use the [concerned sensor] in PHYSICAL ACTIVITY / STRESS AT WORK / SLEEPING? * Does the [concerned sensor] embarrass you PHYSICAL ACTIVITY / STRESS AT WORK / SLEEPING? * Is the [concerned sensor] INCOMPATIBLE with some of your daily tasks? * Hypothesis 5: "Acceptability effect on intention to use" “Users plan to use more the most acceptable device (e.g. the best compromise between usefulness (reliability + utility) and ease of use)”. This hypothesis will be answered with the following question from the questionnaire: Do you think you would use the [concerned device] for PHYSICAL ACTIVITY / STRESS A...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Main hypothesis. Hypothesis 1 “Users are concerned that the weight play a role on their health”. More precisely, we want to verify that users are “aware” about the potential effect of obesity on their health. Hypothesis 2 “Users want to keep data about their weight”. We would like to verify if users are interested to keep an eye on the history of their data recordings (Years/Months/Days). Indeed, data visualization with charts might be a good way to analyze the weight progression. Hypothesis 3 “Users want to see their weight on the balance”. We would like to verify if users want to see their weight directly on the body weight scale or only on dashboard or both. Hypothesis 4 “Users want to receive feedback”. We would like to verify if a notification system about the quality of the home environment is something important for the user. Contrary to a system where users only consult a dashboard. This hypothesis will also have question in case user answer yes in order to verify: - Open paragraph to gather ideas related to interesting feedback, - Users want to receive feedback on a specific interface or device (e.g. TV, smartphone, etc.), - Users want to have notification related to rules established thanks to body weight objectives, - Users want to have control (stop or not the notification system) and/or define the rules related to the feedbacks delivered by the system. Hypothesis 5 “Users are interested by connected devices”. We want to verify the user interest for connected devices vs. classic data measurement. Hypothesis 6 “Users think that the system could help them to change their daily habits”. We would like to verify if users are interested by the system to improve the quality of their home environment and reduce risk factors. Hypothesis 7 “Users want to have a transparent connected body weight scale”. We would like to verify if users are concerned by the connected aspects of the solution: integrated to home automation network, store related data to be consulted later, etc. Hypothesis 8 “Users want to keep data private”. We would like to verify if users are concerned by data privacy, if user would like to manage the status of their own data: confidential, shareable, on internet, other. Hypothesis, questionnaires and user requirements relations In the deliverable 2.1, 16 user requirements have been identified and prioritized. In the Table 7, we propose to link hypothesis, user requirements and specific questions. Hypothesis User requirements Questions H1 UR1 1,2 H2 - 9,10...

Related to Main hypothesis

  • Graduation 2. Student teaching outside of a reasonable commuting distance

  • Metode Penelitian Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah hukum normatif. Sumber data yang dipergunakan pada penelitian ini adalah data sekunder yang terdiri dari :

  • Criminal History Applicants who have criminal convictions may be denied. Any crimes associated with drugs, violence, sex, property damage, and/or weapons may be grounds for automatic disqualification. Eligibility is dependent upon the level, disposition, and time since the crime occurred. Open cases for similar crimes may be grounds for denial. Credit. A credit check will be performed, and the following may be grounds for denial: past due or dishonored debt, the absence of a credit history, unpaid housing accounts, unpaid utility accounts.

  • Kesimpulan Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) merupakan bentuk kerjasama ekonomi bilateral antara Indonesia xxx Jepang yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kegiatan impor, ekspor xxx investasi di kedua negara. Kerangka perjanjian ini meliputi liberalisasi perdagangan, investasi, perlindungan hak kekayaan intelektual, transparansi, anti-persaingan, memperdalam kerja xxxx, xxx menetapkan prosedur untuk menegakkan perjanjian. Perjanjian ini terjalin dilandasi oleh kepentingan nasional masing-masing negara. Adapun kepentingan nasional Indonesia dalam perjanjian ini xxxxxx xxxx mengoptimalkan kerjasama antara Indonesia-Jepang, mendapat kepastian akses pasar di Jepang yang lebih luas berkat penurunan tarif, meningkatkan arus barang xxx xxxx, mendapatkan transfer teknologi, sebagai sektor penggerak, program kesejahteraan, xxx juga menjadi pusat pengembangan manufaktur. General Review semestinya diadakan lima tahun setelah dilaksanakannya perjanjian. namun Jepang menunda pelaksanaan kegiatan ini sampai diubahnya Peraturan Menteri Keuangan yang diklaim tidak sesuai dengan IJEPA. Padahal sebelumnya Indonesia sudah menawarkan Jepang agar memberi usulan terkait peraturan ini sebelum diterbitkan. Indonesia masih mengejar kepentingannya untuk memenuhi perundingan ulang terkait tarif bea masuk xxx tarif impor yang belum terlaksana secara efektif. Selain berkenaan tentang kepentingan nasional, Indonesia sebenarnya juga tidak menetapkan tujuan yang jelas yang akan dicapai dalam kerjasama ekonomi ini. Diplomasi ekonomi yang diupayakan indonesia dalam kerjasama ekonomi bilateral ini didasari oleh beberapa faktor seperti latar belakang sejarah, hubungan perdagangan xxxx xxxxxx menguntungkan, xxx juga kemajuan perekonomian Jepang. Indonesia juga bergantung kepada situasi ekonomi Jepang karena kegiatan impor,ekspor, xxx investasi yang berlangsung memberi dampak terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi Indonesia dilihat dari nilai perdagangan yang terus mengalami tren kenaikan. Meskipun menguntungkan,Indonesia harus terus bersikap tegas dalam melaksanakan perjanjian ini xxxxxx xxxxx banyak kepentingan nasional dari kerjasama bilateral ini yang belum sepenuhnya tercapai. Melalui analisis komprehensif terhadap kendala yang tidak kondusif bagi Indonesia dalam tinjauan umum IJEPA. Indonesia akan melanjutkan upayanya untuk mewujudkan kepentingan nasionalnya melalui kerja sama ini. Kerja sama ini diharapkan dapat terus meningkatkan hubungan baik perekonomian antara Indonesia-Jepang. DAFTAR PUSTAKA Anggraeni, N. A. (2020). DIPLOMASI EKONOMI JEPANG DALAM UPAYA PERPINDAHAN LIMBAH B3 MELALUI INDONESIA-JAPAN ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (IJEPA). Jurnal PIR: Power in International Relations, 3(2), 156-172. Ardiyanti, S. T. (2015). Dampak Perjanjian Perdagangan Indonesia - Jepang (Ijepa) Terhadap Kinerja Perdagangan Bilateral. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, 9(2), 129–151. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.30908/bilp.v9i2. 5 Arifin Rivai, A. N. (2017). Posisi Indonesia di Tengah Fenomena Korporasi Global (Studi Kasus: Relasi Dagang Indonesia – Toyota Pasca Kesepakatan IJEPA). Indonesian Perspective, 2(2), 105. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.14710/ip.v2i2.18 474 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx. (2019). Faktor Penghambat Peningkatan Investasi Jepang di Indonesia dalam Kerangka Kerja IJEPA 208-2018. Universitas Katolik Parahyangan. Gocklas C.S, L., & Sulasmiyati, S. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) Terhadap Nilai Perdagangan Indonesia-Jepang (Studi Pada Badan Pusat Statistik 2000-2016). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB)|Vol, 50(5), 191–200. xxxxx://xxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx/media/pub lications/188892-ID-analisis- pengaruh-indonesia-japan- econom.pdf Hadi, S. (2014). Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement: an Indonesian Perspective. East Asian Policy, 06(03), 114–128. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.1142/s17939305 14000312 Harahap, I. K., & Xxxxxx, A. M. (2015). DAMPAK PENERAPAN INDONESIA-JAPAN ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT TERHADAP EKSPOR INDONESIA KE JEPANG. Media Ekonomi, 23(1), 27. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.25105/me.v23i1. 0000 Xxxxxx, X. S. (2016). KEGAGALAN INDONESIA DALAM IMPLEMENTASI INDONESIAN JAPAN ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (IJEPA). Jurnal Lyceum, 4(1), 430–439. Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2015). Analisis Review Indonesia Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) dalam Perdagangan Barang. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.1108/eb057810

  • Tell-tale Tell-tale optional. If it exists, its function shall be carried out by the tell-tale required for the front and rear position lamps.

  • Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Prohibition Contractor agrees that it shall not sell, provide, or otherwise distribute Sugar-Sweetened Beverages, as defined by San Francisco Administrative Code Chapter 101, as part of its performance of this Agreement.

  • Treaty of Waitangi 1. Provided that such measures are not used as a means of arbitrary or unjustified discrimination against persons of the other Parties or as a disguised restriction on trade in goods, trade in services and investment, nothing in this Agreement shall preclude the adoption by New Zealand of measures it deems necessary to accord more favourable treatment to Maori in respect of matters covered by this Agreement, including in fulfilment of its obligations under the Treaty of Waitangi.

  • AT&T-12STATE acknowledges that CLEC may have an embedded base of one-way trunks ordered and installed prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement that were used for termination of CLEC’s Section 251(b)(5)/IntraLATA Toll Traffic to AT&T-12STATE (Embedded Base). To the extent that CLEC has such an Embedded Base, CLEC shall only augment trunk groups in the Embedded Base with the mutual agreement of the Parties. CLEC shall not order any new one-way trunk groups following the Effective Date of this Agreement. Moreover, the Parties agree that the Embedded Base will be converted to two-way trunk groups under the following circumstances:

  • SB GRADUATE 4600 RESERVED CLIN (supply) Noun: OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODCS) - SB GRADUATE PSC: NSN: N - Not Applicable

  • THE ACADEMY 2.1 The Company will establish and maintain, and carry on or provide for the carrying on of the Academy in accordance with the Master Agreement and this Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.