Habitat Analysis and Characterization of Project Study Area Sample Clauses

Habitat Analysis and Characterization of Project Study Area. The Engineer shall perform an analysis and characterization of habitat and habitat impacts for the study area and documented on the Biological Evaluation Form. The habitat analysis shall be based on the most current State and TPWD MOU and associated Programmatic Agreements. o For transportation activities involving no new right-of-way or easements, including temporary easements, this includes:  The habitat descriptions of habitat types (e.g., forested, prairie, riparian, floodplain, rangeland, agricultural) in the study area are based upon the 2013 MOU.  The habitat description shall indicate the vegetative type(s) listed for the study area in the 2013 MOU.  The habitat description shall include a description of the existing vegetation within and adjacent to the right-of-way, as per the 2013 MOU.  The habitat description shall describe habitat for protected species if such habitat occurs within or adjacent to the right-of-way.  The description shall be supplemented with topographic maps (based on USGS 7.5' maps, aerial photos, on-site photographs and per the 2013 MOU.  Maps and aerial photos shall be annotated to indicate the locations and areas of distinct vegetative types if any have been identified during field inspections.  Photographs shall illustrate representative vegetation for each vegetation type. Aerial photographs (with dates) shall be provided when available. o If the vegetation within the right-of-way does not match the description as per the 2013 MOU or if there is an unusual difference between the vegetation in the right-of-way and outside the right-of-way, details shall be included in the description to clearly explain the differences in vegetative content between the existing vegetation and the 2013 MOU 4) For transportation activities involving new right-of-way or easements, including temporary easements, the habitat description shall address the entire study area. For projects with multiple alternatives, all DocuSign Envelope ID: 32531276-D54D-42BA-B8CD-1FFE51D0946F alternatives shall be described to the same level of detail. If lack of access to the new location right-of-way limits field observation for the habitat description, existing published sources shall be used to provide an estimate. All elements of description required for projects with no new right-of-way (above) shall be included. Land use within and outside the proposed right-of-way shall be described. In addition, the description of vegetation in the new right-of-wa...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Habitat Analysis and Characterization of Project Study Area. The Engineer shall perform an analysis and characterization of habitat and habitat impacts for the study area and documented on the Tier I Site Assessment and Biological Evaluation Form. The habitat analysis must be based on the most current State and TPWD Memorandum of Understanding with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (2013 MOU) and associated Programmatic Agreements. Because it is anticipated that further coordination is required, a Tier II Site Assessment or Biological Resources Tech Report would be prepared according to the Programmatic Agreement under the MOU.

Related to Habitat Analysis and Characterization of Project Study Area

  • Investment Analysis and Implementation In carrying out its obligations under Section 1 hereof, the Advisor shall:

  • Project Implementation 2. The Borrower shall:

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

  • Research Plan The Parties recognize that the Research Plan describes the collaborative research and development activities they will undertake and that interim research goals set forth in the Research Plan are good faith guidelines. Should events occur that require modification of these goals, then by mutual agreement the Parties can modify them through an amendment, according to Paragraph 13.6.

  • Study An application for leave of absence for professional study must be supported by a written statement indicating what study or research is to be undertaken, or, if applicable, what subjects are to be studied and at what institutions.

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.

  • Project Plan Development of Project Plan Upon the Authorized User’s request, the Contractor must develop a Project Plan. This Project Plan may include Implementation personnel, installation timeframes, escalation procedures and an acceptance plan as appropriate for the Services requested. Specific requirements of the plan will be defined in the RFQ. In response to the RFQ, the Contractor must agree to furnish all labor and supervision necessary to successfully perform Services procured from this Lot. Project Plan Document The Contractor will provide to the Authorized User, a Project Plan that may contain the following items: • Name of the Project Manager, Contact Phone Numbers and E-Mail Address; • Names of the Project Team Members, Contact Phone Numbers and E-Mail Address; • A list of Implementation milestones based on the Authorized User’s desired installation date; • A list of responsibilities of the Authorized User during system Implementation; • A list of designated Contractor Authorized Personnel; • Escalation procedures including management personnel contact numbers; • Full and complete documentation of all Implementation work; • Samples of knowledge transfer documentation; and • When applicable, a list of all materials and supplies required to complete the Implementation described in the RFQ. Materials and Supplies Required to Complete Implementation In the event that there are items required to complete an Implementation, the Contractor may request the items be added to its Contract if the items meet the scope of the Contract. Negotiation of Final Project Plan If the Authorized User chooses to require a full Project Plan, the State further reserves the right for Authorized Users to negotiate the final Project Plan with the apparent RFQ awardee. Such negotiation must not substantively change the scope of the RFQ plan, but can alter timeframes or other incidental factors of the final Project Plan. The Authorized User will provide the Contractor a minimum of five (5) business days’ notice of the final negotiation date. The Authorized User reserves the right to move to the next responsible and responsive bidder if Contractor negotiations are unsuccessful.

  • Study Population ‌ Infants who underwent creation of an enterostomy receiving postoperative care and awaiting enterostomy closure: to be assessed for eligibility: n = 201 to be assigned to the study: n = 106 to be analysed: n = 106 Duration of intervention per patient of the intervention group: 6 weeks between enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure Follow-up per patient: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post enterostomy closure, following enterostomy closure (12-month follow-up only applicable for patients that are recruited early enough to complete this follow-up within the 48 month of overall study duration).

  • Research Project 3.1 These Materials and Data will be used by Recipient's PI solely in connection with the Research Project, as named and described in the attached research application (insert Research Project name below):

  • Tests and Preclinical and Clinical Trials The preclinical studies and clinical trials conducted by or, to the Company’s knowledge, on behalf of the Company, that are described in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, as applicable, and are intended to be submitted to FDA or other comparable government entities, were and, if still ongoing, are being conducted in all material respects in accordance with experimental protocols, procedures and controls pursuant to accepted professional scientific standards and all Authorizations and Applicable Laws, including, without limitation, the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder and for studies submitted to regulatory authorities for approval, current Good Clinical Practices and Good Laboratory Practices and any applicable rules and regulations of the jurisdiction in which such trials and studies are being conducted; the descriptions of the results of such studies and trials contained in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus are, to the Company’s knowledge, accurate and complete in all material respects and fairly present the data derived from such studies and trials; except to the extent disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, the Company is not aware of any studies or trials, the results of which the Company believes reasonably call into question the study or trial results described or referred to in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus when viewed in the context in which such results are described and the clinical stage of development; and, except to the extent disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, the Company has not received any written notices or written correspondence from the FDA or any governmental entity requiring the termination or suspension of any preclinical studies or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of the Company, other than ordinary course communications with respect to modifications in connection with the design and implementation of such trials, copies of which communications have been made available to you.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.