Programmatic Agreements Sample Clauses
A Programmatic Agreements clause establishes a formal framework for ongoing or future collaborations between parties, often in the context of complex or multi-phase projects. This clause outlines the procedures, responsibilities, and expectations for entering into subsequent, more detailed agreements as specific programs or initiatives are developed. By setting out the groundwork for how future agreements will be negotiated and executed, it ensures consistency, streamlines the contracting process, and reduces the risk of misunderstandings as new projects arise under the broader relationship.
Programmatic Agreements. This master Guaranteed Admission Agreement supersedes any program-specific admission agreement between ▇▇▇▇▇ and LFCC.
Programmatic Agreements. Early and continuous coordination between agencies will occur on applicable project-specific programmatic agreements. Each agency will assign a specific person to be the point of contact for each agreement. Each agency will agree to review and comment on the draft agreements according to an agreed upon schedule.
Programmatic Agreements. The Council and the agency official may negotiate a programmatic agreement to govern the implementation of a particular program . . . Concurrent submittal to FHWA FHWAconsults Keeper Follow36 CFR 800.7 orACHP terminates consultation resolve disagreement per Stipulation X.D
Programmatic Agreements. Where the BLM determines that a specific proposed solar energy project has the potential to adversely affect historic properties but those effects cannot be determined prior to the project’s approval, the BLM may develop an undertaking-specific PA executed pursuant to 36 CFR §800.14(b), instead of following the process outlined in Subpart 4 above. a) The BLM shall identify and invite tribes, organizations, and individuals or other parties as appropriate (pursuant to 36 CFR §800.2(c)) to consult and participate in the development of the PA.
Programmatic Agreements. In addition to its other obligations, the AGENCY agrees:
Programmatic Agreements. Where the BLM determines that a specific proposed solar 397 energy project has the potential to adversely affect historic properties but those effects 398 cannot be determined prior to its approval, the BLM may elect to review a proposed solar 399 energy project using an undertaking-specific PA executed pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6, in 400 place of an MOA:
401 a) Upon the acceptance of a complete application and at the earliest stages of review 402 of a specific undertaking, the BLM may determine that special circumstances require 403 developing, in consultation with the appropriate SHPO(s), ACHP, and other 404 Concurring Parties, a project-specific PA that will govern Section 106 review of the 405 undertaking.
406 b) The BLM shall identify and invite tribes, organizations, and individuals or other 407 parties as appropriate (pursuant to 36 CFR 800.2(c)) to consult and participate in the 408 development of the PA.
409 c) The PA shall be consistent with requirements of 36 CFR 800. It shall address, but 410 is not limited to, an Area of Potential Effect, a process for identification and evaluation 411 of historic properties, consideration of provisions requiring ethnographic data 412 collection, a process for incorporating design changes to avoid or minimize adverse 413 effects to historic properties, development of Historic Properties Management Plans 414 (HPMP) for those projects with historic properties that require management or 415 monitoring for avoidance and protection within or near a project’s boundaries, a 416 process for incorporating methods for avoiding, minimizing, or mitigating adverse 417 effects, a process for the preparation and implementation of an Historic Properties 418 Treatment or Mitigation Plan, a process for amending the PA, and a process for 419 resolving disagreements and terminating the PA.
Programmatic Agreements. The January 2001 version of the regulations contains a new provision (denoted as 800.14(b)(4) that authorizes the Council to create what is referred to as “prototype programmatic agreements” that can provide a model for other subsequent PA’s to be prepared and executed between a federal agency (FHWA) and a SHPO for the same type of program, or for a repetitious `program type’ [class of undertakings] without Council participation. This approach may offer a more expeditious way to develop and implement PA’s. The Iowa agencies have agreed, informally, that they do not wish to adopt a full program alternative to the standard Section 106 process. Rather, they will simply plan to continue following the standard process prescribed by Part 800, and prepare fairly detailed written procedures to document how they will follow the Part 800 process from start to finish. Those written procedures are the subject of this document, and they are prepared as much for the benefit of other, outside agencies (such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) with whom the DOT and FHWA interact frequently during project development as they are for FHWA, DOT and SHPO, themselves. The intent is to document and attest to the commitment of the three-party Iowa group to follow the process to its required conclusion for all applicable projects. Any Part 800 procedural PA developed by the Iowa agencies would be prepared and used in accordance with the provisions of Section 800.14(b) of the regulations. The reader is referred to that section for details.
Programmatic Agreements