Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action Sample Clauses

Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The District Board approves the School’s methods for evaluating pupil performance and procedures for corrective action set forth in current school policy, and subject to the conditions below and otherwise in this Contract:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. DSST agrees to cooperate with School District administrators to coordinate testing and reporting of test data with the School District's statistical reporting needs. DSST also agrees to implement any testing requirements or assessments necessary to meet the School District's obligations under Colorado law including, without limitation, the Educational Accountability Act and the Educational Accreditation Act and the provisions of the No Child Left Xxxxxx Xxx, 00 X.X.X. § 0000(x)(0). District shall provide six monthsnotice to DSST when a change in approved software is implemented by the District unless otherwise required by law.
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The Board accepts the School’s methods for evaluating pupil performance as contained in Section F of the Application and corrective action contained in Section F of the Application. The Board approves the School’s proposal for the use of multiple tools for assessment of student performance which shall include but not be limited to standardized achievement tests as described in Section F of the application. The School agrees to cooperate with School District administrators to coordinate testing and reporting of test data with the School District's statistical reporting needs. The School agrees to conduct standardized testing using forms and schedules prescribed by the School District. The School also agrees to implement any testing requirements or assessments necessary to meet the School District's obligations under Colorado law including, without limitation, the Educational Accountability Act and the Educational Accreditation Act, and the requirements of S.B. 163 as finalized in August 2010. The School shall pay to the School District the pro-rata costs associated with all such tests and assessments such as, but not limited to, the cost of test booklets and scoring and tabulating results.
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The Board approves the School’s methods for evaluating pupil performance and procedures for corrective action contained on page 9 of the Application, subject to the conditions below and otherwise set forth in this Contract. The School agrees to coordinate testing with the School District’s statistical needs.
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The Board accepts TCA's methods for evaluating pupil performance as contained in the Plan for Evaluating Student Performance Section of the Application as amended by this Contract and subject to the conditions stated herein:
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The 208 Board of Education approves Liberty Common's methods for evaluating pupil performance and 209 procedures for corrective action as contained in the Application. The Board of Education 210 approves Liberty Common's proposal for the use of multiple tools for an assessment of student 211 performance, which shall include but not be limited to standardized achievement tests as described 212 in the Application, or as may be amended by the Liberty Common Board of Directors from time 213 to time. Liberty Common agrees to implement any testing and reporting requirements deemed 214 necessary by the School District to meet the School District's obligations under C.R.S. § 22-7- 215 401 et seq., upon being reasonably notified of said requirements. Should the School District 216 require testing beyond that required by the state, the School District will pay for these costs. 217 218
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The Board approves the Charter School’s methods for evaluating pupil performance and procedures for corrective action set forth on revised Attachment H-2 which sets forth the criteria for pupil performance, as amended below, and subject to the conditions below and otherwise in this contract:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The Board accepts Horizons’ methods for evaluating pupil performance as contained in the Plan for Evaluating Student Performance Section of the original Application. The Board of Education accepts Horizons’ proposal for the use of multiple tools for assessment of student performance that shall include, but not be limited to, standardized achievement tests. Horizons agrees to cooperate with School District administrators to coordinate testing and the reporting of test data with the School District’s statistical reporting needs and to implement any testing requirements and assessments that may be required to meet the School District’s obligations under the provisions of Colorado law including, without limitation, , the Accountability Act, and the provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6311(b)(3). Horizons shall pay to the School District the pro-rata costs associated with all such tests and assessments such as, but not limited to, the cost of test booklets and scoring and tabulating results.

Related to Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action

  • Human and Financial Resources to Implement Safeguards Requirements 6. The Borrower shall make available necessary budgetary and human resources to fully implement the EMP and the RP.

  • PROCEDURES AND/OR CRITERIA FOR COURSE ARTICULATION a. Complete the ROP Careers with Children course at Freedom High School with a grade of “B” or better.

  • Your Grievance and Appeals Rights If you have a complaint or are dissatisfied with a denial of coverage for claims under your plan, you may be able to appeal or file a grievance. For questions about your rights, this notice, or assistance, you can contact your state insurance department at (000) 000-0000 or by email at XxxxxxXxxXxxxxxx@xxxx.xx.xxx, the U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration at 0-000-000-0000 or xxx.xxx.xxx/xxxx, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services at 0-000-000-0000 x00000 or xxx.xxxxx.xxx.xxx. Does this Coverage Provide Minimum Essential Coverage? The Affordable Care Act requires most people to have health care coverage that qualifies as “minimum essential coverage.” This plan or policy does provide minimum essential coverage. Does this Coverage Meet the Minimum Value Standard? The Affordable Care Act establishes a minimum value standard of benefits of a health plan. The minimum value standard is 60% (actuarial value). This health coverage does meet the minimum value standard for the benefits it provides. Language Access Services: Para obtener asistencia en Español, llame al 0-000-000-0000. Kung kailangan ninyo ang tulong sa Tagalog tumawag sa 0-000-000-0000. 如果需要中文的帮助,请拨打这个号码 0-000-000-0000. Dinek'ehgo shika at'ohwol ninisingo, kwiijigo holne' 0-000-000-0000. ––––––––––––––––––––––To see examples of how this plan might cover costs for a sample medical situation, see the next page.–––––––––––––––––––––– About these Coverage Examples: These examples show how this plan might cover medical care in given situations. Use these examples to see, in general, how much financial protection a sample patient might get if they are covered under different plans. This is not a cost estimator. Don’t use these examples to estimate your actual costs under this plan. The actual care you receive will be different from these examples, and the cost of that care will also be different. See the next page for important information about these examples. Having a baby (normal delivery) ◼ Amount owed to providers: $7,540 ◼ Plan pays $7,490 ◼ Patient pays $50 Sample care costs: Hospital charges (mother) $2,700 Routine obstetric care $2,100 Hospital charges (baby) $900 Anesthesia $900 Laboratory tests $500 Prescriptions $200 Radiology $200 Vaccines, other preventive $40 Total $7,540 Patient pays: Deductibles $0 Copays $20 Coinsurance $0 Limits or exclusions $30 Total $50 Managing type 2 diabetes (routine maintenance of a well-controlled condition) ◼ Amount owed to providers: $5,400 ◼ Plan pays $4,760 ◼ Patient pays $640 Sample care costs: Prescriptions $2,900 Medical Equipment and Supplies $1,300 Office Visits and Procedures $700 Education $300 Laboratory tests $100 Vaccines, other preventive $100 Total $5,400 Patient pays: Deductibles $0 Copays $300 Coinsurance $300 Limits or exclusions $40 Total $640 These examples are based on coverage for an individual plan. Questions and answers about the Coverage Examples: What are some of the assumptions behind the Coverage Examples? • Costs don’t include premiums. • Sample care costs are based on national averages supplied by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and aren’t specific to a particular geographic area or health plan. • The patient’s condition was not an excluded or preexisting condition. • All services and treatments started and ended in the same coverage period. • There are no other medical expenses for any member covered under this plan. • Out-of-pocket expenses are based only on treating the condition in the example. • The patient received all care from in- network providers. If the patient had received care from out-of-network providers, costs would have been higher. What does a Coverage Example show? For each treatment situation, the Coverage Example helps you see how deductibles, copayments, and coinsurance can add up. It also helps you see what expenses might be left up to you to pay because the service or treatment isn’t covered or payment is limited. Does the Coverage Example predict my own care needs?

  • Contractor Requirements and Procedures For Business Participation Opportunities For New York State Certified Minority- and

  • Health and Safety Grievances A. It is the policy of the State employer to enforce safety and health, policies, procedures, and work practices and protect employees from harm in connection with State operations.

  • Contractor Requirements and Procedures For Business Participation Opportunities For NYS Certified Minority- and Women-Owned Business Enterprises and Equal Employment Opportunities for Minority Group Members and Women

  • CERTIFICATION PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION AGAINST FIREARM AND AMMUNITION INDUSTRIES (Texas law as of September 1, 2021) By submitting a proposal to this Solicitation, you certify that you agree, when it is applicable, to the following required by Texas law as of September 1, 2021: If (a) company is not a sole proprietorship; (b) company has at least ten (10) full-time employees; (c) this contract has a value of at least $100,000 that is paid wholly or partly from public funds; (d) the contract is not excepted under Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.003 of SB 19 (87th leg.); and (e) governmental entity has determined that company is not a sole-source provider or governmental entity has not received any bids from a company that is able to provide this written verification, the following certification shall apply; otherwise, this certification is not required. Pursuant to Tex. Gov’t Code Ch. 2274 of SB 19 (87th session), the company hereby certifies and verifies that the company, or association, corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, or limited liability company, including a wholly owned subsidiary, majority-owned subsidiary parent company, or affiliate of these entities or associations, that exists to make a profit, does not have a practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association and will not discriminate during the term of this contract against a firearm entity or firearm trade association. For purposes of this contract, “discriminate against a firearm entity or firearm trade association” shall mean, with respect to the entity or association, to: “(1) refuse to engage in the trade of any goods or services with the entity or association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association; (2) refrain from continuing an existing business relationship with the entity or association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association; or (3) terminate an existing business relationship with the entity or association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.001(3) of SB 19. “Discrimination against a firearm entity or firearm trade association” does not include: “(1) the established policies of a merchant, retail seller, or platform that restrict or prohibit the listing or selling of ammunition, firearms, or firearm accessories; and (2) a company’s refusal to engage in the trade of any goods or services, decision to refrain from continuing an existing business relationship, or decision to terminate an existing business relationship to comply with federal, state, or local law, policy, or regulations or a directive by a regulatory agency, or for any traditional business reason that is specific to the customer or potential customer and not based solely on an entity’s or association’s status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association.” See Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.001(3) of SB 19.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Technical Objections to Grievances It is the intent of both Parties of this Agreement that no grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error, other than time limitations in processing the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end, an arbitration board shall have the power to allow all necessary amendments to the grievance and the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of a grievance, in order to determine the real matter in dispute and to render a decision according to equitable principles and the justice of the case.

  • Function of Joint Health and Safety Committee All incidents involving aggression or violence shall be brought to the attention of the Joint Health and Safety Committee. The Employer agrees that the Joint Health and Safety Committee shall concern itself with all matters relating to violence to staff.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.