Consulting Party Review Sample Clauses

Consulting Party Review. 1. Within 7 calendar days of receiving acceptable curricula and job aids from the Coalition, OEA shall submit the material to the Consulting Parties.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Consulting Party Review. If the DOT, in consultation with SHPO, is able to conclude that there will be no adverse effect, either initially or following project modification, then the parties will notify all consulting parties, including tribes, of the finding, provide copies of any key documentation developed in conjunction with the finding, and request comments. Again, refer to Section 800.3(b) for discussion of ways the agencies will endeavor to blend these Section 106 notifications to the public with notifications/reviews of other environmental information for a project. 800.5(c)(1) Agreement with ‘No Adverse Effect’ Finding: The SHPO will have 30 days from its receipt of the notification to return a response to the DOT. If SHPO responds within the 30 days that it concurs with the ‘no adverse effect finding,’ then Section 106 processing is considered completed at that point, and the project may proceed. If no response is received from the SHPO within the 30-day period, then the parties may assume SHPO concurrence, and the project may proceed. 800.5(c)(2) Disagreement with ‘No Adverse Effect’ Finding: If the SHPO, or any of the established consulting parties disagrees, and files its response with the DOT and FHWA within the 30- day review period, then further consultation between the parties must be undertaken to resolve the disagreement to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the consultation fails to resolve the disagreement, the FHWA will contact the Council and request that it review the finding. See Section 800.5(c)(3), below. 800.5(c)(2)(ii) Tribal Disagreement with Finding: If a tribe that has been recognized as a consulting party (by virtue of having advised the DOT or FHWA that it attaches religious and cultural significance to a site subject to the ‘no adverse effect finding’) has objected to the finding, then that tribe must specify the reasons it objects, and it may choose to request that the Council review the finding if the FHWA has not already done so. 800.5(c)(3) Advisory Council Review of Finding: When the FHWA contacts the Council to request its review of the disputed finding, it must include copies of certain documentation required by Section 800.11(e) of the new regulations. (Refer to that section of the new regulations for details.) If the correct documentation has been supplied to the Council, it must, under the regulations, review the ‘no adverse effect’ finding and notify the FHWA of its decision as to whether it believes the adverse effect criteria have...
Sample 1

Related to Consulting Party Review

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Consulting Services 7. Except as ADB may otherwise agree, and except as set forth in the paragraph below, the Borrower shall apply quality- and cost-based selection for selecting and engaging Consulting Services.

  • Professional Development Reimbursement Management will provide reimbursement for approved professional development expenses for Lieutenants and Sergeants. Funds may be used for the purpose of improving job performance, maintaining and increasing proficiency, preparing Lieutenants and Sergeants for greater responsibility, or increasing promotional opportunities. Management must approve of the specific professional development request in advance. Denial will require written notification to the requesting Lieutenant or Sergeant.

  • Joint Review JADRC may, at the request of either party, review issues arising from the application of this Article.

  • Consulting Contract – Follow-On Work ‌ No person, firm, subsidiary or subcontractor of a firm that has been awarded a consulting services contract or a contract which includes a consulting component may be awarded a Contract for the performance of services, the purchase of goods or supplies, or the provision of any other related action which arises from or can reasonably be deemed an end-product of work performed under the initial consulting to consulting-related Contract.

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

  • Procurement Related Complaints and Administrative Review 49.1 The procedures for making a Procurement-related Complaint are as specified in the TDS.

  • Independent Engineer Contractor shall cooperate with Independent Engineer in the conduct of his or her duties in relation to the Project and the Work, including the duties listed in Attachment CC. No review, approval or disapproval by Independent Engineer shall serve to reduce or limit the liability of Contractor to Owner under this Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.