Capability Review Procedure Sample Clauses

Capability Review Procedure. There will be 3 reviewers made up of 2 x G8’s, Area Supt.’s or equivalent management staff. The review will assess the most senior candidates in their current role to identify any significant gaps which may be an issue in the new role. The Area Supt. responsible for the area will nominate the key skills required and give them a weighting. A comparison will then be done of the 3 reviewer’s ratings and compared to the weighting to identify any significant gaps. The process is: • Most senior applicant candidate identified • Skills for current Grade held by candidate are identified from relevant Botany Mill Competency Standard – Evidence Guide and listed by category • Weighting applied based on importance of these skills for the new Grade • Candidate is reviewed against this list by Grade 8s, Area Superintendent or Management Staff. • Review of ratings versus the weighting is conducted. • Outcome is that senior candidate will be selected for training / appointment if no skills gaps identified between rating of current performance on the weighted skills. • If gaps are identified with a candidate – the Mill Training Committee will address this issue with the employee and a plan to address the issues will be implemented. Upon the issues being addressed, the employee will be considered for future training and promotional opportunities under the process outlined in this clause, • The process is then repeated on the next candidate.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Capability Review Procedure

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by AGREEMENT, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer.

  • Review Procedures The Parties agree to jointly conduct a review, sampling transactions of the incidents managed under this Agreement. Findings that are inconsistent with the normal or accepted way of doing business will be reconciled on a case by case basis. Any decision to further examine records will be considered on a case by case basis and appropriate follow up action agreed upon by all agencies involved. Payment for Protection Services (use if appropriate) Geographic, Statewide or Sub-Geographic (local) operating plans and procurement documents or agreement will establish billing procedures for Fee Basis Protection Services.

  • Claims Review Methodology a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject to the Quarterly Claims Review.‌

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • Claims Review Objective A clear statement of the objective intended to be achieved by the Claims Review.

  • Evaluation Procedure The procedural requirements set forth in this agreement to provide specificity to the statutory obligations established under sections 3319.111 and 3319.112 of the Ohio Revised Code and to conform to the framework for the evaluation of teachers developed under section 3319.112 of the Ohio Revised Code.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.