Authority Review - Initial Sample Clauses

Authority Review - Initial. The Authority Staff shall review the Streetscape Master Plan, Conceptual Parks and Open Space Master Plan or Signage Master Plan Applications (each, a “Master Plan Application”) for completeness and advise Developer in writing of any deficiencies within thirty (30) days after the receipt of the applicable Master Plan Application. In the event the Authority Staff does not so advise Developer, the Master Plan Application shall be deemed Complete and all time periods for Authority and City review shall run from the date of such deemed Completeness. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a determination that a Master Plan Application is deemed Complete shall not prevent the Authority Staff from requesting such additional materials as deemed reasonably necessary to complete the review by the Authority and City.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Authority Review - Initial. Authority Staff shall review as expeditiously as reasonably possible each Sub-Phase Application using the same procedures described for Major Phase Applications in Section 4.2.1. A Sub-Phase Application shall not be deemed a Complete Application for purposes of the review periods set forth below until (1) the Executive Director notifies Developer that it is a Complete Application, in which case the review periods shall commence on the date of such notification; or (2) the Executive Director fails to notify Developer that the Sub-Phase Application is either Complete or deficient within the time periods specified in Section 4.2.1 in which case the review periods shall commence on the date that the Sub-Phase Application is deemed Complete pursuant to Section 4.2.1.
Sample 1Sample 2
Authority Review - Initial. Authority Staff shall review each Major Phase Application as expeditiously as reasonably possible for conformance with the Development Requirements. Within thirty (30) days following receipt of a Major Phase Application, Authority Staff shall notify Developer of any deficiencies and make any requests for additional information or materials that are reasonably necessary in order to process the Major Phase Application under this DRDAP and are consistent with the type of documents listed in Exhibit 2 for Major Phase Applications. Developer shall promptly correct any such deficiencies and provide any such requested information and materials. The Executive Director shall make a determination of whether a Major Phase Application is a Complete Application no later than thirty (30) days following receipt of such Major Phase Application, as such time period may be extended in accordance with Section 4.1, or, if applicable, no later than fifteen (15) days following receipt of any additional information and materials requested under this Section 4.2.1, and notify Developer of the same. If the Executive Director does not so advise the applicant within such thirty (30) or fifteen (15) day period, as applicable, the Major Phase Application shall be deemed Complete and all time periods for Authority and City review shall run from the date of such deemed Completeness. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a determination that a Major Phase Application is deemed Complete shall not prevent the Executive Director from requesting such additional materials as deemed reasonably necessary for the Authority's and City's review of the Application in accordance with this DRDAP.
Sample 1
Authority Review - Initial. Authority Staff shall review each Schematic Design Document Application as expeditiously as reasonably possible using the same procedures described for Major Phase Applications in Section 4.2.1. A Schematic Design Document Application shall not be deemed a Complete Application for purposes of the review periods set forth below until (1) the Executive Director notifies Developer that it is a Complete Application and the review periods shall commence on the date of such notification; or (2) the Executive Director fails to notify Developer that the Schematic Design Document Application is either Complete or deficient within the time periods specified in Section 4.2.1 in which case the review periods shall commence on the date that the Schematic Design Document Application is deemed Complete pursuant to Section 4.2.1.
Sample 1
Authority Review - Initial. Authority Staff shall review as expeditiously as reasonably possible each Design Development Application using the same procedures described for Major Phase Applications in Section 4.2.1. A Design Development Application shall not be deemed a Complete Application for purposes of the review periods set forth below until (1) the Executive Director notifies Developer that it is a Complete Application or (2) the Executive Director fails to notify Developer that the Design Development Application is either Complete or deficient within the time periods specified in Section 4.2.1 in which case the review periods shall commence on the date that the Design Development Application is deemed Complete pursuant to Section 4.2.1.
Sample 1

Related to Authority Review - Initial

  • Department Review If a mutually acceptable solution has not been reached during Step 1, and the employee intends to pursue the grievance formally, the employee shall submit the grievance in writing on the Employee Grievance Resolution Form to the Department Head with a copy to the Labor Relations Division not later than ten (10) working days after the supervisor’s written response. The Department Head shall consider the grievance and render a written decision within ten (10) working days of receipt of the formal grievance. The written decision shall include a clear and concise statement including the reason(s) for the decision. The Department Head may hold a meeting with the employee to achieve any of the following purposes: 1) to identify why the employee feels there is a grievance and facilitate communication and resolution; 2) to clearly identify issues and areas of agreement/disagreement; and 3) to have the parties present whatever available information/ documentation necessary to fully attempt to resolve the grievance. The employee may be accompanied by his/her shop xxxxxxx during the Department Review, provided that the xxxxxxx is in the same department as the employee, and has been identified by the employee on the Employee Grievance Resolution Form. If the department, in consultation with the Labor Relations Division, determines that the grievance is outside of the Department Head’s authority, or the grievance involves employees working in separate departments, then such grievance shall be submitted to Step 3.

  • Departmental Review If informal resolution of the problem through conciliation and negotiation cannot be effected, an aggrieved person may file a formal complaint with the departmental affirmative action coordinator or other designated official. Such a complaint must be filed on a form provided for this purpose and within five working days after the attempted resolution of the problem by the equal employment opportunity counselor or within twenty-five (25) working days after the date of the alleged discriminatory action, whichever shall first occur. The affirmative action coordinator will decide whether the complaint falls within the jurisdiction of the procedure and accept or reject it. Upon acceptance of the complaint, the affirmative action coordinator shall obtain the notes on the case from the equal employment opportunity counselor; may conduct a prompt, impartial investigation if he deems it necessary; shall explore the possibility of resolving the problem through negotiation or conciliation; shall present findings and recommendations on resolving the complaint to the agency/department head; and within forty-five (45) working days from the date the formal complaint was filed, shall present his written decision, as approved by the agency/department head, to the complainant, with a copy of the complaint and decision to be forwarded to the director of personnel.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Systems Review The Construction Administrator will conduct reviews of proposed roof, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, conveyance, sprinkler, telecommunications, and life safety systems, and will consider initial cost, availability, impact on the overall program, comfort and convenience, long-term maintenance and operating costs, and impacts on schedule.

  • Claims Review Findings a. Narrative Results.‌‌

  • Statewide HUB Program Statewide Procurement Division Note: In order for State agencies and institutions of higher education (universities) to be credited for utilizing this business as a HUB, they must award payment under the Certificate/VID Number identified above. Agencies, universities and prime contractors are encouraged to verify the company’s HUB certification prior to issuing a notice of award by accessing the Internet (xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/tpasscmblsearch/index.jsp) or by contacting the HUB Program at 000-000-0000 or toll-free in Texas at 0-000-000-0000.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that:

  • System Security Review All systems processing and/or storing DHCS PHI or PI must have at least an annual system risk assessment/security review which provides assurance that administrative, physical, and technical controls are functioning effectively and providing adequate levels of protection. Reviews should include vulnerability scanning tools.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.