Setting Benchmarks Sample Clauses

Setting Benchmarks. Pursuant to this process, the Company and Artist and/or Producer (as needed) should set benchmarks or inclusive hiring targets for hiring qualified individuals from under-represented backgrounds for off-screen roles. In so doing, the Parties should seek guidance from EXPERT9 and/or COUNSEL and may consider the geographic location of filming, local, state, or national demographics, whether the Picture is relying on crew hired locally or crew being brought in from outside locations, including the composition of the pool of qualified candidates, recent similar productions, and any other relevant factors.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Setting Benchmarks. The Company and Artist and/or Producer (as needed) should set benchmarks or inclusive hiring targets for qualified individuals from under-represented backgrounds. In so doing, the Parties should seek guidance from EXPERT4 and/or COUNSEL5 and may consider the geographic 2 “Under-represented” is intended to be an expansive term, whose definition can be adjusted to address specific situations, or to include other under-represented groups protected by law. 3 The Parties should determine at the outset of the process who must be involved, i.e., who are the relevant decisionmakers, to ensure successful implementation of the Inclusion Rider. That might include the Director, Casting Director, Artist, and/or Producer, or others. 4 In addition to relying on the same Expert who can collect and analyze data, see Paragraphs 4-6, the Parties could also rely upon human resources and DE&I professionals. See Inclusion Rider Studio and Production Company Policy Implementation Guide. location of filming including local, state, or national demographics, the time period in which the Picture is set, whether the film is based on or adapted from historical or current true events, the composition of the pool of qualified candidates, recent similar productions, and any other relevant factors.6

Related to Setting Benchmarks

  • Benchmarks 2.1 Benchmarks set forth the overall scope and level of responsibility and the typical duties by which jobs or positions are distinguished and classified under the Classification System.

  • Criteria (1) Annual Evaluation Criteria. All performance evaluations shall be based upon assigned duties, and shall carefully consider the nature of the assignment in terms, where applicable, of:

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 5.6.

  • Service Objectives D4.1 The Services will:

  • Performance Framework Service Agreements are a central component of the NSW Health Performance Framework, which documents how the Ministry monitors and assesses the performance of public sector health services to achieve expected service levels, financial performance, governance and other requirements. The performance of a health service is assessed on whether the organisation is meeting the strategic objectives for NSW Health and government, the Premier’s Priorities and performance against key performance indicators. The availability and implementation of governance structures and processes, and whether there has been a significant critical incident or sentinel event also influences the assessment. The Framework sets out responses to performance concerns and management processes that support the achievement of outcomes in accordance with NSW Health and government policies and priorities. Performance concerns will be raised with the Organisation for focused discussion at performance review meetings in line with the NSW Health Performance Framework available at: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx.xxx.xx/Xxxxxxxxxxx/Xxxxx/xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx Legislation, governance and performance framework 2021–22 Service Agreement 6

  • Specific Objectives In accordance with Articles 34 and 35 of the Cotonou Agreement, the specific objectives of this Agreement are to:

  • Performance Measurement Satisfactory performance of this Contract will be measured by:

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.