Selection of projects following a call for proposals Sample Clauses

Selection of projects following a call for proposals. As provided by the IPA Implementing Regulation, the submitted project proposals will undergo a joint selection process. The project evaluation should follow the PRAG rules (Chapter 6.4.) as adapted by the provisions of the IPA Implementing Regulation (e.g. Article 140 on the role of the Commission in the selection of operations)36. A joint Steering Committee, designated by the JMC, will evaluate projects against the criteria set in the Application Pack and will establish a ranking list according to PRAG. On that basis, the Joint Monitoring Committee will then bring the final decision on the pro- jects to be recommended for financing to the Contracting Authoriti- es (Implementing Agency in Croatia, EC Delegation in Montenegro). The main steps of the procedure should be as follows: o The JTS receives and registers the applications. o The JMC designates the joint Steering Committee and, if nece- ssary, external assessors, which will be provided through the TA allocation of the programme. o The Steering Committee is established with an equal represen- tation of representatives of the 2 countries. The voting mem- bers shall be proposed by the Operating Structures. Members of the Steering Committee are designated exclusively on the basis of technical and professional expertise in the relevant area. The JTS provides a secretariat to the Steering Committee. o Both OSs may propose the same number of external assessors to be financed from the respective TA allocations. o The EC Delegations in Croatia and in Montenegro should ex ante approve the composition of the Steering Committee and the external assessors. o The Steering Committee assesses the projects against the con- ditions and criteria established in the Call for proposals–Appli- cation Pack and according to PRAG procedures. o The JMC receives from the Steering Committee the Evaluation Report and the ranking list of projects and votes on accepting the proposed ranking list. The members of the Steering Com- mittee are present at the JMC meeting to present the evaluati- on process. The JMC has the possibility to: ■ Accept the Evaluation Report and recommend the Contracting authorities to contract the projects selected. ■ Request one round of re-examination of the project proposals if a qualified majority of its voting members vote for such a process and under the condition that there is a clearly stated technical reason affecting the quality of the Evaluation Report
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Selection of projects following a call for proposals

  • Sole Source as Grounds for Rejection of a Change Order If a Change Order is submitted to Contractor for the purposes of adding a Bulletin to this Contract and said Bulletin designates a Sole Source from which Contractor is required to procure goods or services necessary to perform the Work, which Sole Source has not been designated previously, Contractor shall be entitled to reject the proposed Change Order if the designated Sole Source refuses to provide to Contractor the warranties, bonds, terms or schedule required under the Contract Documents, including any warranty or terms or schedule required by Bulletins referenced in the proposed Change Order. In such event, Contractor shall give written notice to the Owner rejecting the proposed Change Order and, if possible, shall accompany said written notice with a proposal from Contractor for changes or modifications to the Bulletin so as to eliminate the Sole Source designation but to achieve goods or services equal in quality or function. The Owner may then require the Design Professional to revise the subject Bulletin so as to eliminate the designation of the Sole Source by incorporation of Contractor's proposal or otherwise. Upon revision of the Bulletin by the Design Professional and approval thereof by the Owner, the Owner shall again submit to the Contractor a proposed Change Order for the purpose of adding the revised Bulletin to this Contract. If the Owner decides to retain the Sole Source in the Change Order and Contractor cannot acquire the full contractually required warranties from the Sole Source, Contractor shall be held only to the warranty terms and schedule obtainable from the Sole Source.

  • Project Monitoring by the State The State may conduct on-site or off-site monitoring reviews of the Project during the term of this Grant Agreement and for up to ninety (90) days after it expires or is otherwise terminated. The Grantee shall extend its full cooperation and give full access to the Project site and to relevant documentation to the State or its authorized designees for the purpose of determining, among other things:

  • CONTRACTOR’S SUBMISSION OF CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS In connection with any Contract modification, OGS reserves the right to:  request additional information  reject Contract modifications  remove Products from Contract modification requests  request additional discounts for new or existing Products

  • Rejection of Proposals The County reserves the right to reject any and all proposals or to accept the proposal or any part thereof which it determines to best serve the needs of the County and to waive any informalities or irregularities in the proposals. While cost is a factor in any contract award, it is not the only factor and may not be the determining factor.

  • Application and Selection (1) Application for professional development leave shall contain an appropriate outline of the project or work to be accomplished during the leave.

  • Submission of Certified Payroll Transcripts for Public Works Contracts Only Contractors and Subcontractors on public works projects must submit monthly payroll transcripts to the Authorized User that has prepared or directs the preparation of the plans and specifications for a public works project, as set forth in the Bid Specifications. For Mini-Bid solicitations, the payroll records must be submitted to the entity preparing the agency Mini-Bid project specification. For “agency specific” Bids, the payroll records should be submitted to the entity issuing the purchase order. For all other OGS Centralized Contracts, such records should be submitted to the individual agency issuing the purchase order(s) for the work. Upon mutual agreement of the Contractor and the Authorized User, the form of submission may be submitted in a specified disk format acceptable to the Department of Labor provided: 1) the Contractor/Subcontractor retains the original records; and, (2) an original signed letter by a duly authorized individual of the Contractor or Subcontractor attesting to the truth and accuracy of the records accompanies the disk. This provision does not apply to Article 9 of the Labor Law building services contracts.

  • Important Information About Procedures for Opening a New Account To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, Federal law requires all financial organizations to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person who opens an account. What this means for you: When you open an account, you are required to provide your name, residential address, date of birth, and identification number. We may require other information that will allow us to identify you.

  • Selection of projects and financial parameters 4.1 Open calls and availability of funds (including number of calls, duration of calls, and estimated size):

  • Evaluation of Proposals 29.1 UNDP shall examine the Proposal to confirm that all terms and conditions under the UNDP General Terms and Conditions and Special Conditions have been accepted by the Proposer without any deviation or reservation.

  • Form and substance of requests for assistance 1. Requests pursuant to this Protocol shall be made in writing. They shall be accompanied by the documents necessary to enable compliance with the request. When required because of the urgency of the situation, oral requests may be accepted, but must be confirmed in writing immediately.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.