SCHEDULING ORDER. This matter is before the Court on the Expedited Request for Entry of Scheduling Order and Motion to Approve Proposed Settlement with Trustmark, to Approve the Proposed Notice of Settlement with Trustmark, to Enter the Bar Order, and to Enter the Rule 54(b) Final Judgment and Bar Order (the “Motion”) of Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx (the “Receiver”), as Receiver for the Receivership Estate in SEC x. Xxxxxxxx International Bank, Ltd., No. 3:09-CV-0298-N (N.D. Tex.) (the “SEC Action”), and the Official Stanford Investors Committee (the “Committee”), as a party to the SEC Action and as a plaintiff in Rotstain, et al. v.
SCHEDULING ORDER. 13 The following table summarizes all relevant dates and deadlines set forth in this Order, to Date Event No later than ten (10) business days following the entry of this Order Notice shall be posted on the Class Settlement Website, along with all relevant Court orders in the Actions. No later than 65 calendar days before the Final Approval Hearing Deadline for Plaintiffs to file Final Approval Motion and Attorneys’ Fees Motion No later than 30 calendar days before the Final Approval Hearing Objection Deadline No later than 15 calendar days before the Final Approval Hearing Deadline to respond to Objections
SCHEDULING ORDER. This matter is before the Court on the Expedited Request for Entry of Scheduling Order and Motion to Approve Proposed Settlement with Xxxxxxxxxx & Xxxxx LLP, to Approve the Proposed Notice of Settlement with Xxxxxxxxxx & Xxxxx LLP, to Enter the Bar Order, to Enter the Rule 54(b) Final Judgment and Bar Order, and for Plaintiffs’ Attorneys’ Fees (the “Motion”)
SCHEDULING ORDER. Before the Court is the Expedited Request for Entry of Scheduling Order and Motion to Approve Proposed Settlement with Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, Arch Specialty Insurance Company, and Lexington Insurance Company (collectively “Underwriters”), to Enter the Bar Order, to Enter the Final Judgments and Bar Orders, and for Attorneys’ Fees (the “Motion”) filed by Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx, in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Stanford International Bank, Ltd. et al. (the “Receiver”). Docket No. [CITE]. The Motion concerns a proposed settlement (the “Agreement”) among and between the Receiver, the Official Stanford Investors Committee, and Underwriters. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this order shall have the meaning assigned to them in the Agreement. In the Motion, the Receiver seeks the Court’s approval of the terms of the Agreement, including entry of a bar order in the SEC Action (the “Bar Order”), and a final judgment and bar order in Underwriters x. Xxxxxx, No. 3:09-cv-1736 (N.D. Tex.) (the “Coverage Action”) and the Third-Party Coverage Actions.1 After reviewing the terms of the Agreement and considering the arguments presented in the Motion, the Court preliminarily approves the Agreement as adequate, fair, reasonable, and equitable. Accordingly, the Court enters this scheduling order to (i) provide for notice of the terms of the Agreement, including the proposed Bar Order in the SEC Action and the proposed Judgments and Bar Orders in the Coverage Action and the Third-Party Coverage Actions; (ii) set the deadline for filing objections to the Agreement, the Bar Order, the Judgment and Bar Orders, or the request for approval of the Receiver’s attorneys’ fees; (iii) set the deadline for responding to any objection so filed; and (iv) set the date of the Final Approval Hearing regarding the Agreement, the Bar Order in the SEC Action and the proposed Judgments and Bar Orders in the Coverage Action and the Third-Party Coverage Actions, and the Receiver’s request for attorneys’ fees, as follows:
SCHEDULING ORDER. The Bankruptcy Court entered the Scheduling Order on May 6, 2005.
SCHEDULING ORDER. On January 31, 2022, the Court entered its Amended Section 557 Procedures- Phase 2 Scheduling Order [Doc. 1800] (the “557 Scheduling Order”). Pursuant to the 557 Scheduling Order, the matter was set for trial on March 4, 2022.
SCHEDULING ORDER. The Plaintiff and Defendant agreed to the following terms of this scheduling order: Defendant shall file a response no later than 12/9/21; and any reply shall be
SCHEDULING ORDER. 3. As soon as practicable after this Stipulation has been executed, the Settling Parties shall submit this Stipulation, together with its exhibits to the Court, and shall jointly apply to the Court for entry of the Scheduling Order, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, providing for, among other things, certification of the Class for purposes of the Settlement only, notice of the Settlement to the Class, and the scheduling of the Settlement Hearing. STAY
SCHEDULING ORDER. This matter is before the Court on the Expedited Request for Entry of Scheduling Order and Motion to Approve Proposed Settlement with the SG Defendants,1 to Approve the Proposed Notice of Settlement with the SG Defendants, to Enter the Bar Order, and for Plaintiffs’ Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses (the “Motion”) of Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx (the “Receiver”), as Receiver for the Receivership Estate in SEC x. Xxxxxxxx International Bank, Ltd., No. 3:09-CV-0298-N (N.D. Tex.) (the “SEC Action”), and the Official Stanford Investors Committee (the “Committee”), as a party
SCHEDULING ORDER. If the Debtors have not filed a motion seeking authority to enter into the DIP Facility (the “DIP Motion”) on or prior to December 14, 2012, KV and the Hologic Parties agree to promptly thereafter, and in no event later than January 3, 2013, enter into an amended Scheduling Order, which shall provide for the rescheduling of all proceedings provided for in the Scheduling Order to the extent such proceedings had not been accomplished prior to the time that the Debtors and the Hologic Parties agreed to interrupt such proceedings in anticipation of a contemplated settlement.
