Public Comments and ICANN Response Sample Clauses

Public Comments and ICANN Response. On February 18, 2009, ICANN published a 154-page analysis of the more than 300 comments it received in the seven public comment forums concerning the first draft of the DAG.10 This analysis was published in conjunction with the second draft of the DAG. The analysis divided the comments into thirteen categories and multiple sub-categories. For each category, ICANN provided: • A summary of the key points; • A summary of the comments; • A list of the main issues raised; • An analysis of these issues; and • Its proposed position (as reflected in the second version of the DAG, published concurrently with the analysis). Articles and blog posts published by followers of the gTLD process during this public comment period pointed to the fact that multiple companies and the United States government opposed the expansion of new gTLDs.11 ICANN responded to this criticism by pointing to the GNSO policy recommendations on new gTLDs, which underwent multiple public comment periods and discussions with a variety of stakeholders and were 8 ICANN, “Comparison between gTLD Agreements from 2005-2007 and Draft Base Registry Agreement for New gTLDs," December 3, 2008, xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/en/topics/new-gtlds/draft-agreement-annotated- comparison-03dec08-en.pdf. 9 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, “ICANN’s gTLD Proposal Hits a Wall: Now What? ," Circle ID, December 23, 2008, xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxx.xxx/posts/icann_gtld_proposal_hits_wall_now_what/.. 10 ICANN, “New gTLD Draft Applicant Guidebook: Analysis of Public Comment," February 18, 2009, xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/en/topics/new-gtlds/agv1-analysis-public-comments-18feb09-en.pdf. 11 Xxxx Xxxxxx, “ICANN plan for new TLDs comes under barrage of criticism," Ars Technica, December 16, 2008, xxxx://xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/security/news/2008/12/icann-plan-for-new-tlds-comes-under-barrage-of- criticism.ars. See also Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, “ICANN’s gTLD Proposal Hits a Wall: Now What? ," Circle ID, December approved by a supermajority within the GNSO. Annex A of ICANN’s Bylaws, which governs the GNSO policy development process, states that “the Board shall adopt the policy according to the GNSO Supermajority Vote recommendation unless by a vote of more than sixty-six (66%) percent of the Board determines that such policy is not in the best interests of the ICANN community or ICANN.”12 In addition, ICANN commits in its Bylaws to “introducing and promoting competition in the registration of domain names where practicable and beneficial in the public interest.”13 While certain ...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Public Comments and ICANN Response. On May 31, 2009, ICANN staff published an analysis of comments on the second draft of the DAG. This analysis was published concurrently with a series of revised excerpts from the DAG; in the analysis, ICANN promised to publish the third draft of the DAG after its June 2009 meeting. As with the first analysis of comments, ICANN staff separated the comments into categories and provided a list of key points, a summary of input, an analysis of the major issues raised, and a proposed position for each category. 16
Sample 1
Public Comments and ICANN Response. ICANN published an analysis of the comments it received on the revised excerpts of the DAG on October 4, 2009, in conjunction with the third draft of the DAG.21 These comments included specific criticisms of the way ICANN was incorporating public participation in the development of the new gTLD program:
Sample 1
Public Comments and ICANN Response. ICANN published an analysis of the public comments on version three of the DAG on February 15, 2010.23
Sample 1
Public Comments and ICANN Response. Separate analyses were published for each public comment forum (10 in all) on May 28, 2009.25 Xxxxxx xxx Xxxxxxxxx of Minds + Machines highlighted several key areas of change in version four of the DAG that raise questions related to public participation: • At the March 2010 ICANN meeting in Nairobi, the ICANN Board voted to maintain vertical separation between registries and registrars. This is reflected in the fourth version of the DAG, though it is subject to change in accordance with the recommendations of the GNSO working group on vertical integration. Xxx Xxxxxxxxx points out that this working group consists “almost wholly of registrars and registries aiming 23 ICANN, “New gTLD Draft Applicant Guidebook Version 3: Public Comments Summary and Analysis," February 15, 2010, xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/en/topics/new-gtlds/summary-analysis-agv3-15feb10-en.pdf.
Sample 1
Public Comments and ICANN Response. ICANN has not yet published its analysis of public comments on the fourth version of the DAG. The public comment forum for the guidebook as a whole contains 125 e-mails, while the six individual module forums contain a total of 25 additional e-mails.29 26 ICANN, “Vertical Integration PDP,” xxxxx://xx.xxxxx.xxx/vert-integration- pdp/index.cgi?https_st_icann_org_vert_integration_pdp_index_cgi_vi_resources. 27 Xxxxxx xxx Xxxxxxxxx, “Latest Version of ICANN’s Applicant Guidebook – DAG4," Minds + Machines, June 1, 2010, xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/2010/06/latest-version-of-icanns-applicant-guidebook-dag4/.
Sample 1

Related to Public Comments and ICANN Response

  • Public Comment The Executive, during the Employment Period and at all times thereafter, shall not make any derogatory comment concerning the Company or any of its current or former directors, officers, stockholders or employees. Similarly, the then current (i) members of the Board and (ii) members of the Company’s senior management shall not make any derogatory comment concerning the Executive, and the Company shall use reasonable efforts to ensure that the former (A) members of the Board and (B) members of the Company’s senior management do not make any derogatory comment concerning the Executive.

  • Lobbying Activities - Standard Form - LLL No response Do not upload this form unless Vendor has reportable lobbying activities. There are Attributes entitled, “2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision - Xxxx Anti-Lobbying Amendment – Continued.” Properly respond to those Attributes and only upload this form if applicable/instructed. If upload is required based on your response to those Attributes, the Disclosure of Lobbying Activities – Standard Form - LLL must be downloaded from the “Attachments” section of the IonWave eBid System, reviewed, properly completed, and uploaded to this location.

  • Government’s Response Please refer to the Q&A from the first question.

  • REQUIRED PRICE PROPOSAL RESPONSE All pricing must be fixed cost, inclusive of all expenses and fees if this Statement of Work proposal is for a fixed price agreement. (Remove if Time and Materials agreement) For Time and Materials the pricing proposal must include estimated effort hours, hourly rate for proposed personnel, projected timeline, including timing expectations for the State functional and technical resources and be submitted as a separate document from the rest of the proposal. (Remove if not Time and Materials)

  • Public Communications Prior to the Closing Date, the Company will not issue any press release or other communication directly or indirectly or hold any press conference with respect to the Company, its condition, financial or otherwise, or the earnings, business, operations or prospects of any of them, or the offering of the Securities, without the prior written consent of the Placement Agent, unless in the reasonable judgment of the Company and its counsel, and after notification to the Placement Agent, such press release or communication is required by law, in which case the Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to allow the Placement Agent reasonable time to comment on such release or other communication in advance of such issuance.

  • Company’s Response Subject to Section 3(g)(ii), upon receipt or deemed receipt by the Company of a copy of a Conversion Notice, the Company (I) shall promptly send, via electronic mail a confirmation of receipt of such Conversion Notice to the Holder and the Company’s designated transfer agent (the “Transfer Agent”), which confirmation shall constitute an instruction to the Transfer Agent to process such Conversion Notice in accordance with the terms herein, and (II) on or before the second (2nd) Business Day following the date of receipt or deemed receipt by the Company of such Conversion Notice (or, if earlier, the end of the then standard settlement period for U.S. broker-dealer securities transactions) (the “Share Delivery Date”), (A) provided the Holder (or its designee) is eligible to receive such Conversion Shares through The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) (which shall include any time at which the Unrestricted Conditions (as defined below) are satisfied), credit such aggregate number of Conversion Shares to which the Holder shall be entitled to the Holder’s or its designee’s balance account with DTC through its Deposit/Withdrawal at Custodian (“DWAC”) system, or (B) if the foregoing shall not apply, issue and deliver to the address as specified in the Conversion Notice, a stock certificate, registered in the name of the Holder or its designee, in each case, for the number of Conversion Shares to which the Holder shall be entitled. The Conversion Shares will be free-trading, and freely transferable, and will not contain a legend (or stop transfer instructions) restricting the resale or transferability of the Conversion Shares if any of the Unrestricted Conditions (as defined below) is met.

  • Workplace Violence Prevention and Crisis Response (applicable to any Party and any subcontractors and sub-grantees whose employees or other service providers deliver social or mental health services directly to individual recipients of such services): Party shall establish a written workplace violence prevention and crisis response policy meeting the requirements of Act 109 (2016), 33 VSA §8201(b), for the benefit of employees delivering direct social or mental health services. Party shall, in preparing its policy, consult with the guidelines promulgated by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration for Preventing Workplace Violence for Healthcare and Social Services Workers, as those guidelines may from time to time be amended. Party, through its violence protection and crisis response committee, shall evaluate the efficacy of its policy, and update the policy as appropriate, at least annually. The policy and any written evaluations thereof shall be provided to employees delivering direct social or mental health services. Party will ensure that any subcontractor and sub-grantee who hires employees (or contracts with service providers) who deliver social or mental health services directly to individual recipients of such services, complies with all requirements of this Section.

  • Vendor Logo (Supplemental Vendor Information Only) No response Optional. If Vendor desires that their logo be displayed on their public TIPS profile for TIPS and TIPS Member viewing, Vendor may upload that logo at this location. These supplemental documents shall not be considered part of the TIPS Contract. Rather, they are Vendor Supplemental Information for marketing and informational purposes only. Bid Attributes Disadvantaged/Minority/Women Business & Federal HUBZone Some participating public entities are required to seek Disadvantaged/Minority/Women Business & Federal HUBZone ("D/M/WBE/Federal HUBZone") vendors. Does Vendor certify that their entity is a D/M/WBE/Federal HUBZone vendor? If you respond "Yes," you must upload current certification proof in the appropriate "Response Attachments" location. NO Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) Some participating public entities are required to seek Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) vendors as defined by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts Statewide HUB Program. Does Vendor certify that their entity is a HUB vendor? If you respond "Yes," you must upload current certification proof in the appropriate "Response Attachments" location. No National Coverage Can the Vendor provide its proposed goods and services to all 50 US States? Yes

  • Filing of Amendments; Response to Commission Requests The Company will promptly advise the Representatives of any proposal to amend or supplement at any time the Initial Registration Statement, any Additional Registration Statement or any Statutory Prospectus and will not effect such amendment or supplementation without the Representatives’ consent; and the Company will also advise the Representatives promptly of (i) the effectiveness of any Additional Registration Statement (if its Effective Time is subsequent to the execution and delivery of this Agreement), (ii) any amendment or supplementation of a Registration Statement or any Statutory Prospectus, (iii) any request by the Commission or its staff for any amendment to any Registration Statement, for any supplement to any Statutory Prospectus or for any additional information, (iv) the institution by the Commission of any stop order proceedings in respect of a Registration Statement or the threatening of any proceeding for that purpose, and (v) the receipt by the Company of any notification with respect to the suspension of the qualification of the Offered Securities in any jurisdiction or the institution or threatening of any proceedings for such purpose. The Company will use its best efforts to prevent the issuance of any such stop order or the suspension of any such qualification and, if issued, to obtain as soon as possible the withdrawal thereof.

  • Your Comments and Concerns You should direct all feedback, comments, requests for technical support, and other communications relating to the Website to xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.