Mission Suitability Factor (Volume I) Sample Clauses

Mission Suitability Factor (Volume I). The Offeror's Mission Suitability proposal will be evaluated based on the Offeror's ability to fulfill the contract management and technical requirements while meeting quality, schedule, and safety requirements. The compatibility between the proposed technical approach and the overall resources proposed to accomplish the work will be an important consideration in the evaluation of this factor. In addition, proposal risk will be evaluated with respect to cost, performance, technical approach, and management approach. Mission Suitability sub-factors will be assigned adjectival ratings and numerical scores. The overall Mission Suitability Factor will only receive a numerical score. Information submitted in Volume I of the proposal that is not relevant to the Mission Suitability factor will not be evaluated. If the SEC determines that a proposal does not adequately demonstrate that the Offeror will be able to perform the work with the resources proposed, the SEC may determine this to be a mission suitability weakness as well as require an adjustment for probable cost. This integration between mission suitability findings and probable cost adjustments is critical to accomplishing cost realism. The Offerors will be evaluated and scored based on the Mission Suitability sub-factors set forth below. (Note: The following outline should not be construed as an indication of the order of importance or relative weighting within individual elements of the Mission Suitability sub-factors as there are no discrete point values to any of the elements.) TABLE M-3: INDEX OF MISSION SUITABILITY SUB-FACTORS Paragraph Sub-factor Title Elements A Technical Approach – Written Proposal 1) Technical Understanding B Management Approach – Oral Presentation 1) Organization Structure and Partnering Approach
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Mission Suitability Factor (Volume I). The following evaluation subfactors will be used to evaluate the Offeror’s approaches to implementing the functions and specifications delineated in the Statement of Work. INDEX OF MISSION SUITABILITY SUBFACTORS
Sample 1
Mission Suitability Factor (Volume I). The Mission Suitability factor indicates, for each Offeror, the merit or excellence of the work to be performed or product to be delivered. Information must be precise, factual, detailed and complete. Offerors must not assume that the evaluation team is aware of their company abilities, capabilities, plans, facilities, organization or any other pertinent fact that is important to accomplishment of the work.
Sample 1

Related to Mission Suitability Factor (Volume I)

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Evaluation Cycle: Annual Orientation A) At the start of each school year, the superintendent, principal or designee shall conduct a meeting for Educators and Evaluators focused substantially on educator evaluation. The superintendent, principal or designee shall:

  • Usage Measurement Usage measurement for calls shall begin when answer supervision or equivalent Signaling System 7 (SS7) message is received from the terminating office and shall end at the time of call disconnect by the calling or called subscriber, whichever occurs first.

  • QUANTITY CHANGES PRIOR TO AWARD The Commissioner reserves the right, at any time prior to the award of a specific quantity Contract, to alter in good faith the quantities listed in the Bid Specifications. In the event such right is exercised, the lowest responsible Bidder meeting Bid Specifications will be advised of the revised quantities and afforded an opportunity to extend or reduce its Bid price in relation to the changed quantities. Refusal by the low Bidder to so extend or reduce its Bid price may result in the rejection of its Bid and the award of such Contract to the lowest responsible Bidder who accepts the revised qualifications.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria (Reactive Power A wind generating plant shall maintain a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, measured at the Point of Interconnection as defined in this LGIA, if the ISO’s System Reliability Impact Study shows that such a requirement is necessary to ensure safety or reliability. The power factor range standards can be met using, for example without limitation, power electronics designed to supply this level of reactive capability (taking into account any limitations due to voltage level, real power output, etc.) or fixed and switched capacitors if agreed to by the Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected, or a combination of the two. The Developer shall not disable power factor equipment while the wind plant is in operation. Wind plants shall also be able to provide sufficient dynamic voltage support in lieu of the power system stabilizer and automatic voltage regulation at the generator excitation system if the System Reliability Impact Study shows this to be required for system safety or reliability.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Temperature Measurement Temperature will be measured by the nearest automatic Melbourne Bureau of Meteorology Monitoring Station for example (but not limited to): Melbourne, Moorabbin, Dunns Hill, Melbourne Airport, Frankston, and Point Xxxxxx. At the commencement of each project, the onsite management and employee representatives shall agree which is to be the applicable automatic weather monitoring station.

  • Criminal History Category With regard to determining defendant’s criminal history points and criminal history category, based on the facts now known to the government, defendant’s criminal history points equal zero and defendant’s criminal history category is I.

  • Measuring EPP parameters Every 5 minutes, EPP probes will select one “IP address” of the EPP servers of the TLD being monitored and make an “EPP test”; every time they should alternate between the 3 different types of commands and between the commands inside each category. If an “EPP test” result is undefined/unanswered, the EPP service will be considered as unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.