Final Evaluation Rating Sample Clauses

Final Evaluation Rating. Each employee will receive a Final Evaluation Rating of 1 (Unsatisfactory), 2 (Basic), 3 (Proficient) or 4 (Distinguished), which combines his or her State Criteria Rating and Student Growth Score using the Evaluation Scoring and Rating Guide. If an employee receives a 4 (Distinguished) Instructional Framework Score and a Low Student Growth Score, his or her Final Evaluation Rating is 3 (Proficient). If any employee receives a Low Student Growth Score, the employee and evaluator will mutually agree to engage in at least one of the following Low Student Growth Activities: Triangulate student growth measure with other evidence (including observation, artifacts and student evidence) and additional levels of student growth based on classroom, school, District and state-based tools.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Final Evaluation Rating. The final summative evaluation rating that is assigned to a teacher based on the holistic review of all Evaluation Factors observed and evidence obtained during the Evaluation Cycle. The rating shall be “accomplished,” “skilled,” “developing,” or “ineffective.” The final rating shall not be weighted in such a way that one (1) component of the evaluation system has a higher importance than another, except that any area marked N/A shall not negatively impact the evaluation.
Sample 1Sample 2
Final Evaluation Rating. The final, summative holistic rating that is assigned to a teacher based on evaluations that are conducted pursuant to the terms of this agreement. The evaluation rating is assigned at the conclusion of the evaluation cycle. Each completed evaluation will result in the assignment of a teacher to one of the following evaluation ratings: Accomplished, Skilled, Developing or Ineffective. Ineffective Developing Skilled Accomplished Components of the Full Evaluation Cycle • Professional Growth/Improvement Plan • Formal Holistic Observation Followed by Conference • Classroom Walkthroughs • Formal Focused Observation Emphasis on Focus Area(s) • Final Summative Conference Components of the Optional Less Frequent Evaluation Cycle • Professional Growth Plan • One Observation • One Conference with Discussion of Progress on PGP
Sample 1

Related to Final Evaluation Rating

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • Written Evaluation The Superintendent in consultation with the Board shall review and assess the Administrator’s performance on or before February 1 of each year. The Administrator shall be formally evaluated in writing annually by the Superintendent on or before February 1 of each year. The evaluation shall include a description of the Administrator’s duties and responsibilities and the standards to which the Administrator is to perform. It shall consider the Administrator’s specific duties, responsibilities, management and competence as an Administrator; specify the Administrator’s strengths and weaknesses with supporting reasons; align with research based standards established by the Illinois State Board of Education and use data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. The evaluation shall also consist of a review of the Administrator’s progress toward meeting established professional, student performance and academic goals set forth in Appendix A and a review of the Administrator’s leadership and management performance relative to his current assignment. The written evaluation shall be signed by both the Superintendent and the Administrator. The Administrator may respond to the evaluation in writing and such response shall be attached to and included in the Administrator’s personnel file.

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.