Filing of Joint Patents Sample Clauses

Filing of Joint Patents. The Parties will cooperate with one another with respect to the filing, prosecution and maintenance of all Joint Patents. The Parties will designate one of the Parties to be responsible for, and to initially bear the expense of, the preparation, filing, prosecution, and maintenance of a Joint Patent, provided that the responsible Party will be entitled to reimbursement by the other Party of an equal share of the responsible Party’s expenses. The Parties agree that for all Joint Patents for Product-Specific Technology, OncoGenex will be deemed to be the responsible Party for the purposes of this Section 6.2.3, and will bear all expenses for the preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of such Patents. With the exception of Joint Patent to Product-Specific Technology, which will be as set forth in Section 6.2.2, the responsible Party will consult with the other Party as to the preparation, filing, prosecution, and maintenance of such Joint Patent reasonably prior to any deadline or action with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office or any foreign patent office, and will furnish to the other Party copies of all relevant documents reasonably in advance of such consultation. For the life of the Joint Patents, the Parties will mutually agree upon all Joint Patent filings. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Isis is unilaterally developing and commercializing the Product in accordance with Section 9.2, Isis will have the first right to file, prosecute and maintain any Joint Patents to Product-Specific Technology at its expense, provided that if Isis elects not (a) to pursue the filing, prosecution or maintenance of such a Joint Patent in a particular country, or (b) to take any other action with respect to such Joint Patent in a particular country that is necessary or reasonably useful to establish or preserve rights thereto, then in each such case Isis will so notify OncoGenex promptly in writing and in good time to enable OncoGenex to meet any deadlines by which an action must be taken to establish or preserve any rights in such Joint Technology in such country, and OncoGenex will have the right, but not the obligation, to pursue the filing or registration, or support the continued prosecution or maintenance, of such Joint Patent, at its expense in such country.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Filing of Joint Patents. All Joint Product Specific Technology Patents will be governed by Section 6.2.2. For all other Joint Patents, the Parties will cooperate with one another with respect to the filing, prosecution and maintenance of such Joint Patents. The Parties will designate one of the Parties to be responsible for, and to initially bear the expense of, the preparation, filing, prosecution, and maintenance of a Joint Patent, provided that the responsible Party will be entitled to reimbursement by the other Party of an equal share of the responsible Party’s expenses. The responsible Party will consult with the other Party as to the preparation, filing, prosecution, and maintenance of such Joint Patent reasonably prior to any deadline or action with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office or any foreign patent office, and will furnish to the other Party copies of all relevant documents reasonably in advance of such consultation. For the life of the Joint Patents, the Parties will mutually agree upon all Joint Patent filings.
Filing of Joint Patents. Akebia will have the first right of election to file patent applications claiming Joint Know-How. If Akebia declines to file such applications, then Licensee may do so.
Filing of Joint Patents. The Parties will cooperate with one another with respect to the filing, prosecution and maintenance of all Joint Patents. The Parties will designate one of the Parties to be responsible for, and to initially bear the expense of, the preparation, filing, prosecution, and maintenance of a Joint Patent, provided that the responsible Party will be entitled to reimbursement by the other Party of an equal share of the responsible Party's expenses. The Parties agree that for all Joint Patents for Product-Specific Technology, Sarissa will be deemed to be the responsible Party for the purposes of this Section 6.2.3, and will bear all expenses for the preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of such Patents. With the exception of Joint Patent to Product-Specific Technology, which will be as set forth in Section 6.2.2, the responsible Party will consult with the other Party as to the preparation, filing, prosecution, and maintenance of such Joint Patent reasonably prior to any deadline or action with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office or any foreign patent office, and will furnish to the other Party copies of all relevant documents reasonably in advance of such consultation. For the life of the Joint Patents, the Parties will mutually agree upon all Joint Patent filings. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Isis is unilaterally developing and commercializing the Product in accordance with Section 9.2, Isis will have the first right to file, prosecute and maintain any Joint Patents to Product-Specific Technology at its expense.

Related to Filing of Joint Patents

  • Filing of Patent Applications Each Party will make timely decisions regarding the filing of Patent Applications on the CRADA Subject Inventions made solely by its employee(s), and will notify the other Party in advance of filing. Collaborator will have the first opportunity to file a Patent Application on joint CRADA Subject Inventions and will notify PHS of its decision within sixty (60) days of an Invention being reported or at least thirty (30) days before any patent filing deadline, whichever occurs sooner. If Collaborator fails to notify PHS of its decision within that time period or notifies PHS of its decision not to file a Patent Application, then PHS has the right to file a Patent Application on the joint CRADA Subject Invention. Neither Party will be obligated to file a Patent Application. Collaborator will place the following statement in any Patent Application it files on a CRADA Subject Invention: “This invention was created in the performance of a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement with the [INSERT into Agency’s model as appropriate: National Institutes of Health, Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention], an Agency of the Department of Health and Human Services. The Government of the United States has certain rights in this invention.” If either Party files a Patent Application on a joint CRADA Subject Invention, then the filing Party will include a statement within the Patent Application that clearly identifies the Parties and states that the joint CRADA Subject Invention was made under this CRADA.

  • Joint Patents With respect to any potentially patentable Joint Invention, AstraZeneca shall have the first right, but not the obligation, to prepare patent applications based on such Joint Invention, to file and prosecute (including defense of any oppositions, interferences, reissue proceedings and reexaminations) such patent applications, and to maintain any Joint Patents issuing therefrom, in any jurisdictions throughout the Territory. FibroGen shall have the corresponding first right, but not the obligation, in any jurisdictions outside of the Territory other than China, in respect of which the China Agreement shall govern. If AstraZeneca determines in its sole discretion to abandon, cease prosecution or otherwise not file or maintain any Joint Patent anywhere in the Territory, then AstraZeneca shall provide FibroGen written notice of such determination at least thirty (30) days before any deadline for taking action to avoid abandonment (or other loss of rights) and shall provide FibroGen with the opportunity to prepare, file, prosecute and maintain such Joint Patent. The Party that is responsible for preparing, filing, prosecuting, and maintaining a particular Joint Patent (the “Prosecuting Party”) shall provide the other Party reasonable opportunity to review and comment on such prosecution efforts regarding such Joint Patent, and such other Party shall provide the Prosecuting Party reasonable assistance in such efforts. The Prosecuting Party shall provide the other Party with a copy of all material communications from any patent authority in the applicable jurisdictions regarding the Joint Patent being prosecuted by such Party, and shall provide drafts of any material filings or responses to be made to such patent authorities a reasonable amount of time in advance of submitting such filings or responses. In particular, each Party agrees to provide the other Party with all information necessary or desirable to enable the other Party to comply with the duty of candor/duty of disclosure requirements of any patent authority. Either Party may determine that it is no longer interested in supporting the continued prosecution or maintenance of a particular Joint Patent in a country or jurisdiction, in which case: (i) the disclaiming Party shall, if requested in writing by the other Party, assign its ownership interest in such Joint Patent in such country or jurisdiction to the other Party for no additional consideration; and (ii) if such assignment is effected, any such Joint Patent would thereafter be deemed a FibroGen Patent in the case of assignment to FibroGen, or a AstraZeneca Patent in the case of assignment to AstraZeneca; provided, however, that the disclaiming party would have an immunity from suit under such FibroGen Patent or AstraZeneca Patent, as the case may be, in the applicable country or jurisdiction. In addition, any Joint Patent that becomes a FibroGen Patent pursuant to the preceding sentence shall be excluded from the license granted to AstraZeneca in Section 7.1. Each Party shall bear its own internal costs in respect of the prosecution of Joint Patents. Out-of-pocket costs incurred in respect of the prosecution and maintenance of Joint Patents in the Territory shall be borne equally by AstraZeneca and FibroGen. In the event a Party elects to disclaim its interest in a Joint Patent, the costs incurred with respect to such Patent after the date of such disclaimer shall thereafter be borne exclusively by the other Party, without reimbursement or credit.

  • Patents and Patent Applications To the Company’s knowledge, all patents and patent applications owned by or licensed to the Company or under which the Company has rights have been duly and properly filed and maintained; to the knowledge of the Company, the parties prosecuting such applications have complied with their duty of candor and disclosure to the USPTO in connection with such applications; and the Company is not aware of any facts required to be disclosed to the USPTO that were not disclosed to the USPTO and which could reasonably be expected to preclude the grant of a patent in connection with any such application or could reasonably be expected to form the basis of a finding of invalidity with respect to any patents that have issued with respect to such applications.

  • Licensed Patents Licensee shall be responsible for all further patent prosecution with respect to the Licensed Patents and Licensed Technologies set out in Exhibit “A”. Licensee may select the patent agent for the prosecution of the Licensed Patents, subject to the approval of Licensor as the patent owner, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld. Licensee shall provide Licensor with copies of all relevant documentation related to the filing and prosecution of the Licensed Patents so that Licensor may be informed and apprised of and meaningfully consulted as to the continuing prosecution. Licensor shall keep all such documentation confidential. In the event the Licensee does not agree that any given patent application or patent should be filed, prosecuted or maintained (hereinafter referred to as a “Refused Licensed Patent”) in a particular jurisdiction(s) Licensee shall indicate such disagreement in writing (hereinafter “Refusal Notice”) and upon Licensor’s receipt of such Refusal Notice Licensor shall have the right unilaterally to make, prosecute and maintain such Refused Licensed * Confidential Information, indicated by [***], has been omitted from this filing and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission Patent in such jurisdiction(s) in the name of its owners, at Licensor’s expense, and Licensee shall not have any rights or obligations to such Refused Licensed Patent in such jurisdiction(s); provided, however, that Licensee shall retain all of its ownership rights in any Refused Licensed Patent that is a Co-Owned Technology. In such case Licensor shall provide Licensee with copies of all relevant documentation related to the filing and prosecution of the Refused Licensed Patents so that Licensee may be informed and apprised of and be meaningfully consulted with as to the continuing prosecution. Licensor shall have no obligation to continue prosecution or maintenance of any Refused Licensed Patent and may abandon same without any prior notice or any obligation to Licensee. Both Licensee and Licensor shall make best efforts to respond promptly to any request from the other Party for input or assistance with respect to matters pertaining to the Licensed Patents. Licensee shall use reasonable efforts to amend any patent application to include claims reasonably requested by the other Party and required to protect the Licensed Technology. In addition to Licensee’s obligations pursuant to section 4.1 above, Licensee shall be solely responsible for all patent and legal costs relating to the Licensed Patents and Licensed Technology (excluding Refused Licensed Patents) from the Effective Date onward, including all costs relating to the transfer of the Licensed Patents to the new patent agents selected by Licensee and approved by Licensor. For any patent and legal costs relating to the Licensed Patents and Licensed Technology (excluding Refused Licensed Patents) paid by Licensor after the Effective Date (including, without limitation, those expenses related to patentability assessments and drafting, filing, prosecution, maintenance, and taxes (the “Patent Costs”)), Licensee shall promptly reimburse Licensor for such Patent Costs upon receipt of an invoice from Licensor for such expenses. For any work in progress with respect to the Licensed Patents for which the Patent Costs have not already been paid by Licensor to its patent firm prior to the transfer of the Licensed Patents to Licensee’s patent agent, Licensor will direct its patent firm to copy Licensee on all such invoices from said patent firm and Licensee will promptly pay said invoices directly to Licensor’s patent firm.

  • Joint Patent Rights 11.8.1 Genmab shall have the first right, but not the obligation, to file, prosecute, maintain and defend Patent Rights relating to Joint Inventions (“Joint Patent Rights”) throughout the Territory, at its sole expense, and Genmab shall give timely notice to CureVac, and, if during the Research Period, with a copy to the IP Sub-Committee, of any desire to not file patent applications claiming Joint Patent Rights or to cease prosecution and/or maintenance of Joint Patent Rights on a country-by-country basis and, in such cases, shall permit CureVac, in its sole discretion, to file such patent applications or to continue prosecution, maintenance or defense of such Joint Patent Rights at its own expense. At the latest [*****] before filing, the prosecuting Party shall give the non-prosecuting Party an opportunity to review and comment upon the text of any application with respect to such Joint Patent Right, shall consult with the non-prosecuting Party with respect thereto, shall not unreasonably refuse to address any of the non-prosecuting Party’s comments and supply the non-prosecuting Party with a copy of the application as filed, together with notice of its filing date and serial number. The prosecuting Party shall keep the non-prosecuting Party reasonably informed of the status of the actual and prospective prosecution, and maintenance, including but not limited to any substantive communications with the competent patent offices that may affect the scope of such filings, and the prosecuting Party shall give the non-prosecuting Party a timely, prior opportunity to review and comment upon any such substantive communication and shall consult with such non- prosecuting Party with respect thereto, and shall not unreasonably refuse to address any of such non-prosecuting Party’s comments.

  • Patent Filings The Party responsible for Prosecution and Maintenance of any Patent Rights as set forth in Section 7.2.2 and Section 7.2.3 will endeavor to obtain patent protection for a Product as it Prosecutes and Maintains its other patents Covering products in development, using counsel of its own choice but reasonably acceptable to the other Party, in such countries as the responsible Party sees fit.

  • Patent Applications It is understood by the parties that, pursuant to the Baylor Technology Transfer Agreement, MAS has the initial responsibility for filing, prosecution and maintenance of Patents and Patent Applications covering the Baylor Technology. The parties agree that, as between MAS and CTI, MAS shall be responsible for deciding whether and how to file, prosecute and maintain the Patents and Patent Applications, provided that:

  • Filing of Materials All records related to a grievance shall be filed separately from the personnel files of the employees.

  • Licensed Patent Rights The term “Licensed Patent Rights” shall mean rights arising out of or resulting from:

  • INFRINGEMENT AND PATENT ENFORCEMENT 11.1 PHS and Licensee agree to notify each other promptly of each infringement or possible infringement of the Licensed Patent Rights, as well as, any facts which may affect the validity, scope, or enforceability of the Licensed Patent Rights of which either party becomes aware.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.