EVALUATION/SELECTION CRITERIA Sample Clauses

EVALUATION/SELECTION CRITERIA. To simplify evaluation and to assure that each submittal receives the same orderly consideration; all submittals are to follow the format described in this section. Respondents are encouraged to submit concise and clear responses to the RFP. Part 1 – Cover Page / Table of Contents Part 2 – Letter of Interest and Executive Summary Provide a letter explaining your interest in the RFP and ability to meet the minimum qualifications and the requirements stated in the RFP. The letter should include an Executive Summary summarizing your relevant qualifications and experience. Part 3 – Profile and Organizational Chart with Staff Profiles Provide the following information:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to EVALUATION/SELECTION CRITERIA

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Desirable Selection Criteria 1. Possession of, or significant progression toward the attainment of a post graduate qualification in area of specialty.

  • Origin Criteria For the goods that meet the origin criteria, the exporter should indicate in Box 8 of this Form, the origin criteria met, in the manner shown in the following table: Circumstances of production or manufacture in the country named in Box 11 of this form: Insert in Box 8

  • Quality-based Selection Services for assignments which the Bank agrees meet the requirements set forth in paragraph 3.2 of the Consultant Guidelines may be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of Quality-based Selection in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.1 through 3.4 of the Consultant Guidelines.

  • Exclusion Criteria Subjects fulfilling any of the following criteria are not eligible for participation in this study.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • Criteria (1) Annual Evaluation Criteria. All performance evaluations shall be based upon assigned duties, and shall carefully consider the nature of the assignment in terms, where applicable, of:

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.