Evaluation of ART and Stoffenmanager Xxxx Sample Clauses

Evaluation of ART and Stoffenmanager Xxxx. Within the NANoREG project we compared the output of two of the tools: ART (described in section 2.3.3.1), which has not been designed specifically for NMs, and Stoffenmanager Nano with 24 field measurement studies (involving 167 activities) provided by the Swiss Accident Insurance Fund (SUVA). The activities were classified in the following domains: - Welding (MIG-MAG, TIG, oxy-acetylene) - Transfer of powders (vacuuming, transfer & mixing of powders, weighing, various MNMs) - Coating (coating of SiO2 on a polyethylene foil by propane burning) - Other hot processes (compounding of plastics and MNMs), incineration) - Spraying (car cleaning, laser printers, application of ENMs on shoes, spraying of metal sheets) - Impaction (blasting of CO2 for cleaning, cutting and nailing nanoporous insulating material) The input values for ART and Stoffenmanager Nano to each exposure situation were firstly assigned independently by two persons, trying to match as closely as possible the definitions of the parameters available in the references for the two models. The choice of parameters’ values was then discussed until a consensus was found. The major sources of disagreement were the attribution of activities, especially the ones outside the scope of the models (e.g. welding & other hot processes). The statistical analysis performed comprises the analysis of the correlations between the obtained scores and the measurements, conducted by computing the (non-parametric) Xxxxxxxx correlation coefficient (rS). Error! Reference source not found.2 and Error! Reference source not found. show box ots of the particle number concentration (PNC) collected with a CPC (upper size limit 1 μm) and geometric mean diameter (GMD) measured by category (whiskers represent the minimum and maximum values, the box the inter-quartile range and the red line the median). The number of exposure situations per activity is indicated in brackets. PNC reached values of up to 25 × 106 (#/cm3). The GMDs were between 20 and 100 nm for most exposure situations. Figure 2 Average measured particle number concentrations (PNC) by activity Figure 3 Average measured geometric mean diameters (GMD) by activity Figures 4 and 5 show the comparison of model scores for ART and Stoffenmanager -Xxxx, respectively, and the measurement data. Figure 4 Normalized ART's scores & PNC measurements, by activity Figure 5 Normalized Stoffenmanager- Xxxx's scores & PNC measurements, by activity Table 9 shows the Xxxxxxxx correlat...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Evaluation of ART and Stoffenmanager Xxxx

  • Application of Article This Article is intended only as a basis of calculating overtime payments, and nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a guarantee of hours of work per day, week, tour of duty, work period or year.

  • PROCEDURES AND/OR CRITERIA FOR COURSE ARTICULATION a. Complete the ROP Careers with Children course at Freedom High School with a grade of “B” or better.

  • Purpose of Article The sole purpose of this Article is to provide a basis for the computation of straight time and overtime, and nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as a guarantee or commitment by the Company to any employee of a minimum or maximum number of hours of work per day, per week, or per year. The Company's pay records, practices, and procedures shall govern the payment of all wages.

  • Applicability of Article Securities of any series which are redeemable before their Stated Maturity shall be redeemable in accordance with their terms and (except as otherwise specified as contemplated by Section 301 for such Securities) in accordance with this Article.

  • OTHER IMPORTANT TERMS 11.1 We may transfer our rights and obligations under this XXXX to another organisation, but this will not affect your rights or our obligations under this XXXX.

  • Evaluation of Contractor Performance of the Contractor under this Agreement will be evaluated. The evaluation shall be prepared on Contract/Contractor Evaluation Sheet (STD 4), and maintained in the Agreement file. For consultant agreements, a copy of the evaluation will be sent to the Department of General Services, Office of Legal Services, if it is negative and over $5,000.

  • Evaluation of Students Acknowledging the District’s adopted grading system, the teacher shall maintain the right and responsibility to determine grades and other evaluation of a student. No grade or evaluation shall be changed except by the teacher with the approval of the building administrator.

  • EVALUATION OF TEACHERS 1. All reports on the work of a teacher shall be in writing.

  • of this Article 10.1.8 The certificated employee's supervisor shall provide assistance toward helping the employee correct any cited deficiencies. Such action will include specific written recommendations for improvement, and may include direct assistance in implementing such recommendations, and adequate release time for the certificated employee to visit and observe other similar classes in other schools.

  • Evaluation Cycle: Annual Orientation A) At the start of each school year, the superintendent, principal or designee shall conduct a meeting for Educators and Evaluators focused substantially on educator evaluation. The superintendent, principal or designee shall:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.