Enforceability of Judgments Sample Clauses

Enforceability of Judgments. Any final and conclusive judgment for the payment of a fixed or readily calculable sum of money rendered by any court of the State of New York or of the United States in respect of any suit, action or proceeding against the Bank based upon the Transaction Documents or the Securities or any agreement or instrument entered into in connection herewith or therewith would be recognized by the federal courts of competent jurisdiction in Australia and the courts of competent jurisdiction in the State of New South Wales against the Bank so as to give rise to a new cause of action based on the judgment and capable of enforcement against the Bank, without re-examination or review of the merits of the cause of action in respect of which the original judgment was given, except where (A) the foreign judgment is not consistent with public policy in Australia, (B) the foreign judgment has been obtained by fraud or duress or (C) the foreign judgment has been obtained in proceedings which contravene the principles of natural justice. The Bank knows of no reason why the enforcement in Australia of such a judgment in respect of the Transaction Documents or the Securities or any agreement or instrument entered into in connection herewith or therewith would be contrary to the public policy of Australia as of the date hereof.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Enforceability of Judgments. Any final judgment for a fixed or readily calculable sum of money rendered by a New York Court having jurisdiction under its own domestic laws and recognized by the Canadian courts as having jurisdiction (according to Canadian conflicts of laws principles and rules of Canadian private international law at the time when proceedings were initiated) to give such final judgment in respect of any suit, action or proceeding against the Company based upon this Agreement herein and therein would be declared enforceable against the Company, without re-examination or review of the merits of the cause of action in respect of which the original judgment was given or re-litigation of the matters adjudicated upon, by the courts of Canada.
Enforceability of Judgments. Except as disclosed in the Pricing Disclosure Package, any final judgment for a fixed sum of money rendered by a New York court having jurisdiction under its own domestic laws in respect of any suit, action or proceeding against the Company based upon the Transaction Documents would be recognized and enforced by (A) BVI or Hong Kong courts without re-examining the merits of the case under the common law doctrine of obligation; provided that (i) adequate service of process has been effected and the defendant has had a reasonable opportunity to be heard, (ii) such judgments or the enforcement thereof are not contrary to the law, public policy, security or sovereignty of the BVI or Hong Kong, (iii) such judgments were not obtained by fraudulent means and do not conflict with any other valid judgment in the same matter between the same parties and (iv) an action between the same parties in the same matter is not pending in any BVI or Hong Kong court at the time the lawsuit is instituted in the foreign court; and (B) PRC courts, subject to compliance with relevant civil procedural requirements under the PRC Civil Procedures Law. It is not necessary that the Transaction Documents, the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package, the Prospectus or any other document be filed or recorded with any court or other authority in the BVI, Hong Kong or the PRC.
Enforceability of Judgments. Any final judgment for a fixed sum of money rendered by a Specified Court having jurisdiction under its own domestic laws in respect of any suit, action or proceeding against the Company based upon this Agreement and the Securities would be recognized and enforced against the Company by Cayman Islands courts without re-examining the merits of the case under the common law doctrine of obligation; provided that (i) adequate service of process has been effected and the defendant has had a reasonable opportunity to be heard, (ii) such judgments or the enforcement thereof are not contrary to the law, public policy, security or sovereignty of the Cayman Islands, (iii) such judgments were not obtained by fraudulent means and do not conflict with any other valid judgment in the same matter between the same parties, and (iv) an action between the same parties in the same matter is not pending in any Cayman Islands court at the time the lawsuit is instituted in the foreign court; it is not necessary that this Agreement, the Prospectus or any other document be filed or recorded with any court or other authority in the Cayman Islands.
Enforceability of Judgments. Each Subsidiary Guarantor not organized in the United States agrees, to the fullest extent that it lawfully may do so, that final judgment in any such suit, action or proceeding brought in a court in the United States shall be conclusive and binding upon it and may be enforced in the courts of its domicile or jurisdiction of organization (or any other courts to the jurisdiction of which the Guarantor is subject) by a suit upon such judgment, provided that service of process is effected upon such Subsidiary Guarantor, as applicable, in the manner specified in the foregoing paragraph or as otherwise permitted by law; provided, however, that such Subsidiary Guarantors do not waive, and the foregoing provisions of this sentence shall not constitute or be deemed to constitute a waiver of, (i) any right to appeal any such judgment, to seek any stay or otherwise to seek reconsideration or review of any such judgment, (ii) any stay of execution or levy pending an appeal from, or a suit, action or proceeding for reconsideration of, any such judgment, or (iii) any other right or remedy of any such Guarantor to the extent not expressly waived in accordance with this Section 11.12.
Enforceability of Judgments. Under the laws of the Cayman Islands and as described in the Prospectus, the courts of the Cayman Islands will recognize and give effect to the choice of law provisions set forth in Section 16 hereof and enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained against the Company to enforce this Agreement, without re-examination or review of the merits of the cause of action in respect of which the original judgment was given or re-litigation of the matters adjudicated upon, by an action commenced on the foreign judgment debt in the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands, provided such judgment (i) is given by a court of competent jurisdiction, (ii) imposes on the judgment debtor a liability to pay a liquidated sum for which the judgment has been given, (iii) is final and conclusive, (iv) is not in respect of taxes, a fine or a penalty, and (v) was not obtained in a manner and is not of a kind the enforcement of which is contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands. Under the laws of the PRC, the choice of law provisions set forth in Section 16 hereof will be recognized by the courts of the PRC and any judgment obtained in any state or federal court located in the Borough of Manhattan, The City of New York, New York (each, a “New York Court”) arising out of or in relation to the obligations of the Company under this Agreement will be recognized in PRC courts subject to the applicable provisions of the Civil Procedure Law of the PRC and the PRC General Principles of Civil Law relating to the enforceability of foreign judgments and the statements set forth in the Prospectus under the caption “Enforcement of Civil Liabilities”.
Enforceability of Judgments. Any final judgment for a fixed or readily calculable sum of money rendered by a New York Court having jurisdiction under its own domestic laws and recognized by the English courts as having jurisdiction (according to English conflicts of laws principles and rules of English private international law at the time when proceedings were initiated) to give such final judgment in respect of any suit, action or proceeding against the Company based upon this Agreement or the Deposit Agreement and any instruments or agreements entered into for the consummation of the transactions contemplated herein and therein would be declared enforceable against the Company, without re-examination or review of the merits of the cause of action in respect of which the original judgment was given or re-litigation of the matters adjudicated upon, by the courts of England.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Enforceability of Judgments. Any final judgment for a fixed or readily calculable sum of money rendered by a New York Court having jurisdiction under its own domestic laws in respect of any suit, action or proceeding against the Company based upon this Agreement or the Deposit Agreement and any instruments or agreements entered into for the consummation of the transactions contemplated herein and therein would be declared enforceable against the Company, without re-examination or review of the merits of the cause of action in respect of which the original judgment was given or re-litigation of the matters adjudicated upon, by the courts of the Cayman Islands and PRC, provided that (i) with respect to courts of the Cayman Islands, (a) such New York Court had proper jurisdiction over the parties subject to such judgment; (b) such New York Court did not contravene the rules of natural justice of the Cayman Islands; (c) such judgment was not obtained by fraud; (d) the enforcement of the judgment would not be contrary to the public policy of the Cayman Islands; (e) no new admissible evidence relevant to the action is submitted prior to the rendering of the judgment by the courts of the Cayman Islands; and (f) there is due compliance with the correct procedures under the laws of the Cayman Islands, and (ii) with respect to courts of the PRC, (A) adequate service of process has been effected and the defendant has had a reasonable opportunity to be heard, (B) such judgments or the enforcement thereof are not contrary to the law, public policy, security or sovereignty of the PRC, (C) such judgments were not obtained by fraudulent means and do not conflict with any other valid judgment in the same matter between the same parties and (D) an action between the same parties in the same matter is not pending in any PRC court at the time the lawsuit is instituted in a foreign court. The Company is not aware of any reason why the enforcement in the Cayman Islands or the PRC of such a New York Court judgment would be, as of the date hereof, contrary to public policy of the Cayman Islands or PRC.
Enforceability of Judgments. Any final judgment for a fixed sum of money rendered by a New York court having jurisdiction under its own domestic laws in respect of any suit, action or proceeding against the Company based upon this Agreement would be recognized and enforced by Cypriot courts, without re-examining the merits of the case under the common law doctrine of obligation.
Enforceability of Judgments. The courts of the Netherlands will in principle give effect to a final monetary judgment obtained against the Company in the courts of the State of New York insofar as it finds that (i) the jurisdiction of the court has been based on a ground of jurisdiction that is generally acceptable according to international standards, (ii) the judgment by the court was rendered in legal proceedings that comply with the Dutch standards of proper administration of justice including sufficient safeguards (behoorlijke rechtspleging), (iii) the binding effect of such U.S. judgment is not contrary to Dutch public policy (openbare orde), and (iv) the judgment by the U.S. court is not incompatible with a decision rendered between the same parties by a Dutch court, or with a previous decision rendered between the same parties by a foreign court in a dispute that concerns the same subject and is based on the same cause, provided that the previous decision qualifies for recognition in the Netherlands and; provided that a Dutch court may deny the recognition and enforcement of punitive damages or other awards; and provided further that the Dutch court may reduce the amount of damages granted by a the court and recognize damages only to the extent that they are necessary to compensate actual losses or damages.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.