Appeal from Sample Clauses

Appeal from. Step Three - Should an employee, after receiving the written answer to his grievance at Step Three of the grievance procedure still feel that the grievance has not been resolved to his satisfaction, he may request that it be heard before an arbitrator. The F.O.P. must make application to the City Manager for arbitration within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of the written answer from the City Manager at Step Three. Only the F.O.P. may authorize an appeal to arbitration, and its decision, based on the facts presented, shall be binding on the employees covered by this Agreement. Upon request, the F.O.P. will furnish the City appropriate certification that the appeal has been duly authorized.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (10)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Appeal from. On appeal from the order of Justice Silja X. Xxxxx of the Superior Court of Justice, sitting as a Summary Conviction Appeal judge, dated October 31, 2003, dismissing the appeal against the acquittal entered by Justice Xxxx X. Xxxxx of the Ontario Court of Justice dated September 6, 2002. Counsel: Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, for the appellant. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered by 1 GILLESE X.X.:-- This is yet another appeal involving the tension between the right to counsel and the right to demand that a breath sample be supplied "forthwith" by means of an approved screening device.
Sample 1
Appeal from. On appeal from the order of the Divisional Court (Justice Xxxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, Justice Xxxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx and Justice Xxxxxxxxx Xxx), dated February 14, 2012. Counsel: Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx and Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, for the appellant Power Workers' Union. Xxxx X. Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, for the appellant Ontario Power Generation. Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, for the appellant Society of Energy Professionals. Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, for the intervenor Ontario Education Services Corporation. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, for the intervenor Consumers Council of Canada. Xxxx Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, for the respondent Ontario Energy Board. The following judgment was delivered by THE COURT:-- Introduction 1 This is an appeal from the order of the Divisional Court dismissing the appeal from a decision of the respondent Ontario Energy Board (the OEB) in which the OEB reduced by $145,000,000 the revenue requirements sought by the appellant Ontario Power Generation Inc. (OPG) to cover its nuclear compensation costs for 2011 and 2012. 2 The sole issue is whether the OEB's decision was reasonable or not. The majority of the Divisional Court found that it was.
Sample 1
Appeal from. An application for leave to appeal from the orders of Justice Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx of the Superior Court of Justice dated January 19, 2005, September 16, 2005, and September 14, 2006, awarding costs to the respondents, with reasons reported at (2005) 74 O.R. (3d) 216 and 2005 CanLII 5865 (On S.C.), [2005] O.J. No. 179. Counsel: Xxxx Xxxxx, for the applicant/appellant. Xxxx X.X. X'Xxxxx and Xxxxxx X. Xxxx, for the respondents The Economical Insurance Group and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Xxxxx X. Xxxx and Xxx X. Xxxxx, for the respondents AXA Insurance (Canada), Allianz Insurance Company of Canada, The Personal Insurance Company of Canada, Trafalgar Insurance Company of Canada, Royal & SunAlliance Insurance Company of Canada, and Middlesex Mutual Insurance Co. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx and Xxxx Xx Xxxxx, for the respondent Zurich Canada. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx and Xxxx Xxxx, for the respondents Co-operators General Insurance Company and The Guarantee Company of North America. Xxxxx X.X. Xxxx, for the respondents The Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company, The Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, Belair Insurance Company, and ING Halifax Insurance Company. Xxxxx X. Xxxxx, for the respondents Pilot Insurance Company and CGU Insurance Company of Canada. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Q.C., for the respondent Allstate Insurance Company. Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, for the respondents Security National Insurance Company, Primmum Insurance Company (formerly known as Canada Life Casualty Insurance Company), Coseco Insurance Company and TD General Insurance Company. Xxxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, for the respondent The Citadel General Assurance Company. Xxxxxx X. Xxxx, for the respondent York Fire & Casualty Insurance Company. Xxxx-Xxxx Xxxxxxx, for the respondent State Farm Insurance Company of Canada. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx and Xxxx X. Xxxxx, for the intervener the Law Foundation of Ontario. COSTS RE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL The following judgment was delivered by THE COURT:--
Sample 1

Related to Appeal from

  • Appeals a. Should the filer be dissatisfied with the Formal Dispute determination, a written appeal may be filed with the Chief Procurement Officer, by mail or email, using the following contact information: Chief Procurement Officer Procurement Services A Division of the Office of General Services 00xx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx, XX 00000 Email: xxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxx@xxx.xx.xxx Subject line: Appeal – Attn: Chief Procurement Officer

  • Appeal Process PROVIDER may appeal any adverse finding by the Contract Compliance Officer as set forth in sec. 25.08(20)(c), D.C. Ords.

  • Administrative Appeals An administrative appeal is a request for us to reconsider a full or partial denial of payment for covered healthcare services for the following reasons: • the services were excluded from coverage; • we determined that you were not eligible for coverage; • you or your provider did not follow BCBSRI’s requirements; or • a limitation on an otherwise covered benefit exists. You are not required to file a complaint (as described above), before filing an administrative appeal. If you call our Customer Service Department, a Customer Service Representative will try to resolve your concern. If the issue is not resolved to your satisfaction, you may file a verbal or written administrative appeal with our Grievance and Appeals Unit. If you request an administrative appeal, you must do so within one hundred eighty (180) days of receiving a denial of payment for covered healthcare services. The Grievance and Appeals Unit will conduct a thorough review of your administrative appeal and respond within: • thirty (30) calendar days for a prospective review; and • sixty (60) calendar days for a retrospective review. The letter will provide you with information regarding our determination.

  • Appeal Procedure The Appeal will be deemed an appeal of the entire Arbitration Award. In conducting the Appeal, the Appeal Panel shall conduct a de novo review of all Claims described or otherwise set forth in the Arbitration Notice. Subject to the foregoing and all other provisions of this Paragraph 5, the Appeal Panel shall conduct the Appeal in a manner the Appeal Panel considers appropriate for a fair and expeditious disposition of the Appeal, may hold one or more hearings and permit oral argument, and may review all previous evidence and discovery, together with all briefs, pleadings and other documents filed with the Original Arbitrator (as well as any documents filed with the Appeal Panel pursuant to Paragraph 5.4(a) below). Notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with the Appeal, the Appeal Panel shall not permit the parties to conduct any additional discovery or raise any new Claims to be arbitrated, shall not permit new witnesses or affidavits, and shall not base any of its findings or determinations on the Original Arbitrator’s findings or the Arbitration Award.

  • Appeal (1) An appeal against a decision of the Court of First Instance may be brought before the Court of Appeal by any party which has been unsuccessful, in whole or in part, in its submissions, within two months of the date of the notification of the decision.

  • Appeal Rights Any dispute concerning the occurrence or amount of the overpayment will be resolved through the grievance procedure in Article 31 Grievance Procedure of this Agreement.

  • Appeal Procedures A. Employees may appeal discipline imposed under this LOA through the Dispute Resolution Procedure contained in the Collective Bargaining Agreement (i.e. grievance procedure) or to the Minneapolis Civil Service Commission.

  • Review and Appeal (a) Each Party shall establish or maintain judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative tribunals or procedures for the purpose of the prompt review and, where warranted, correction of final administrative actions regarding matters covered by this Treaty. Such tribunals shall be impartial and independent of the office or authority entrusted with administrative enforcement and shall not have any substantial interest in the outcome of the matter.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.