Classification Review Board Sample Clauses

Classification Review Board. A. The Classification Review Board will be composed of one representative of the JCAU, one representative of the AOC and one Subject-Matter- Expert (SME) mutually selected by the other two members. Any one of these two members may at any time insist that the SME’s services be terminated for cause (pertaining to unavailability or insufficient availability, inability to produce quality recommendations, inappropriate behavior or failure to meet established time frames), and be replaced by another SME for all future appeals. The Judiciary shall pay the SME.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Classification Review Board. Properly completed and timely filedRequest for Classification Review” forms will be screened by the Classification Review Board. The Classification Review Board must consider individual “Request for Classification Review” forms on their own merits; however, nothing shall preclude the District from directing the Classification Review Board to review an entire classification(s) or from grouping similar requests into one review process. The Classification Review Board shall meet and review the employee’s request no later than thirty (30) working days after receipt of the Request for Classification Review form by the Classified Personnel Services Office. The Classification Review Board hearing(s) shall be held during normal working hours.
Classification Review Board. The procedures in this section will be followed for the reclassification of positions when new positions are created or when substantive changes in duties and responsibilities occur in existing positions.

Related to Classification Review Board

  • Classification Review (a) An Employee who has reason to believe that they are improperly classified due to a substantial change in job duties, may apply to the Department Director, or designate, to have the Employee’s classification reviewed. The Director, or designate, will review the Employee’s application and advise the Employee of the Employer’s decision.

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Position Review ‌ The Employer may initiate a position review for a position it believes is improperly classified, and will inform the Union in writing when it has initiated a reallocation process for a bargaining unit position. An individual employee who believes that their position is improperly classified may request a review according to the following procedure:

  • Exclusion Review Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be:

  • Compensation Review The compensation of the Executive will be reviewed not less frequently than annually by the board of directors of the Company.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Union Grievance Committee (a) The Employer shall recognize a Union Grievance Committee which consists of:

  • Training Committee The parties to this Agreement may form a Training Committee. The Training Committee will be constituted by equal numbers of Employer nominees and ETU employee representatives and have a charter which clearly states its role and responsibilities. It shall monitor the clauses of this Agreement which relate to training and ensure all employees have equal access to training.

  • Client Classification 7.1. We shall not have an obligation to treat our clients in different classes depending on their knowledge and expertise.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.