Canadian Securities Law Matters Sample Clauses

Canadian Securities Law Matters the distribution of the Consideration pursuant to the Arrangement shall be exempt from the prospectus and registration requirements of Canadian Securities Laws either by virtue of exemptive relief from the securities regulatory authorities of each of the provinces of Canada or by virtue of exemptions under Canadian Securities Laws and shall not be subject to resale restrictions under Canadian Securities Laws (other than as applicable to control persons or pursuant to Section 2.6 of National Instrument 45-102 – Resale of Securities);
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Canadian Securities Law Matters. Parent shall (a) maintain the listing and posting for trading of its subordinate voting shares on the CSE unless such Capital Stock is listed and posting for trading on the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq, in which case it shall maintain such listing and posting on such exchange, (b) maintain its status as a “reporting issuer”, or, if Parent’s Capital Stock is listed and posting for trading on the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq, the equivalent thereof in the United States, and, in each case not in default (beyond any notice and cure period) of the requirements of the Applicable Securities Legislation in the Reporting Jurisdictions, and (c) obtain the acceptance of the CSE for the listing and posting of the Warrant Shares if required under the policies of the CSE unless Parent’s Capital Stock is listed and posting for trading on the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq, in which case it shall obtain the acceptance of such exchange for the listing and posting of the Warrant Shares if required under the policies of such exchange.
Canadian Securities Law Matters. Prior to the consummation of the TerrAscend Transaction:
Canadian Securities Law Matters. Prior to the consummation of the TerrAscend Transaction, Parent shall (a) maintain the listing and posting for trading of its subordinate voting shares on the CSE unless such Capital Stock is listed and posting for trading on the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq, in which case it shall maintain such listing and posting on such exchange, and (b) maintain its status as a “reporting issuer”, or, if Parent’s Capital Stock is listed and posting for trading on the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq, the equivalent thereof in the United States, and, in each case not in default (beyond any notice and cure period) of the requirements of the Applicable Securities Legislation in the Reporting Jurisdictions.
Canadian Securities Law Matters. The Company (i) is not, and as of any Original Distribution Date was not, incorporated or organized under the laws of Canada or a jurisdiction of Canada, (ii) has and, as of any Original Distribution Date had, (A) its head office outside of Canada and (B) a majority of its executive officers (within the meaning of both National Instrument 33-105 – Underwriting Conflicts and National Instrument 45-102 – Resale of Securities) and a majority of its directors ordinarily resident outside of Canada, and the Company is not a “reporting issuer” (within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws) in a jurisdiction of Canada. As used in this clause (xl), “Original Distribution Date” means each date on which any of the Securities were distributed by the Company to a Selling Shareholder resident in Canada in reliance on an exemption from a Canadian prospectus requirement.
Canadian Securities Law Matters. (a) 4Front is a “reporting issuer” under Canadian Securities Laws, is not on the list of reporting issuers in default under the Canadian Securities Laws and is in compliance in all material respects with all such Canadian Securities Laws. 4Front has not taken any action to cease to be a reporting issuer nor has 4Front received written notification from any Governmental Authority seeking to revoke the reporting issuer status of 4Front. No delisting, suspension of trading or cease trade or other order or restriction with respect to any securities of any kind or type of 4Front that may prevent or restrict trading is pending, in effect, has been threatened in writing or is expected to be implemented or undertaken.
Canadian Securities Law Matters. (a) The outstanding subordinate voting shares in the share capital of Parent are listed and posted for trading on the CSE.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Canadian Securities Law Matters. To the knowledge of the Company, immediately after the Closing, (i) less than 5% of the holders (beneficial or otherwise) of Company Common Stock are residents of Canada and (ii) less than 5% of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock are beneficially owned by residents of Canada, excluding, in each case of clauses (i) and (ii), the Purchasers.
Canadian Securities Law Matters. The Purchaser certifies that it is not resident in British Columbia and acknowledges that: (i) no securities commission or similar regulatory authority has reviewed or passed on the merits of the Securities; (ii) there is no government or other insurance covering the Securities; (iii) there are risks associated with the purchase of the Securities; (iv) there are restrictions on the Purchaser’s ability to resell the Securities and it is the responsibility of the Purchaser to find out what those restrictions are and to comply with them before selling the Purchased Securities; (vi) the Company has advised the Purchaser that the Company is relying on an exemption from the requirements to provide the Purchaser with a prospectus and to sell securities through a person registered to sell securities under Canadian Securities Laws and as a consequence of acquiring Securities pursuant to this exemption, certain statutory rights of rescission or damages will not be available to the Purchaser.
Canadian Securities Law Matters. CRH is a reporting issuer in the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario, and accordingly is subject to the applicable securities laws of such provinces that have adopted Multilateral Instrument 61-101—Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions (“MI-61-101”). MI 61-101 governs transactions that raise the potential for conflicts of interest and is intended to ensure equality of treatment among securityholders. The protections of MI 61-101 generally apply to issuer bids, insider bids, related party transactions and business combinations. MI 61-101 provides that, in certain circumstances, including where a “related party” of an issuer is entitled to receive a “collateral benefitin connection with an arrangement or any other transaction where the interest of a holder of an equity security of the issuer may be terminated without the holder’s consent (such as the Arrangement), such transaction may be considered a “business combination” for the purposes of MI 61-101 and subject to minority approval requirements. As further described below, because one of CRH’s officers will receive a collateral benefit in connection with the Arrangement within the meaning of MI 61-101, the Arrangement is a “business combination” that is subject the minority approval requirements described under “—Minority Approval” below. Collateral Benefit Analysis Under MI 61-101 a “related party” of CRH includes, among others, (i) directors and senior officers of CRH,
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.