Rating Impact on Student Learning Growth Sample Clauses

Rating Impact on Student Learning Growth. ESE will provide model contract language and guidance on rating educator impact on student learning growth based on state and district-determined measures of student learning. Upon receiving this model contract language and guidance, the parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (109)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Rating Impact on Student Learning Growth. DESE will provide model contract language and guidance on rating educator impact on student learning growth based on state and district-determined measures of student learning by July 15, 2012. Upon receiving this model contract language and guidance, the parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (12)
Rating Impact on Student Learning Growth. The parties shall establish a committee to negotiate the issues related to the rating impact on student learning growth. No changes shall be implemented without mutual agreement between the parties.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Rating Impact on Student Learning Growth. A. Basis of the Impact on Student Learning Rating i. The following student performance measures shall be used in combination with professional judgment to determine an educator’s impact on student learning, growth, and achievement.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
Rating Impact on Student Learning Growth. The parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter during the 2014-2015 school year. The first time administrators are to be rated on their Impact of Student Learning, that rating shall be Moderate or High.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
Rating Impact on Student Learning Growth. The Rating Impact on Student Learning Growth based on District-determined measures of student learning, growth and achievement is to be bargained.
Sample 1
Rating Impact on Student Learning Growth. Following receipt of guidance from ESE, the parties will negotiate the process for using state and district-determined measures to arrive at an Educator’s rating of impact on student learning, growth and achievement.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Rating Impact on Student Learning Growth. The school district will collect the first year of data for determining Student Impact Ratings for all educators and administrators during the school year 2015-2016. The school district will collect the second year data for determining Student Impact Ratings for all educators and administrators during the school year 2016-2017 and the school district will determine Student Impact Ratings for all educators and administrators by October 1, 2017. Subsequent collection and determination of Student Impact Ratings for all educators will be conducted in accordance with state law and regulations and the terms of the collective bargaining agreement between the parties as then in effect. The Student Impact Ratings of high, moderate and low will be based on evidence from multiple measures of student learning, growth or achievement. The multiple measures that will be used are as follows:
Sample 1
Rating Impact on Student Learning Growth. As part of the state’s Educator Evaluation System, a rating of high, moderate, or low will be assigned to teachers on a three-year reporting cycle. Evaluators will base ratings on trends and patterns on state assessments and/or district determined measures (DDMs). Starting with the 2014-2015 school year, educators and evaluators will identify measures that will be used as a basis for judgments about educator impact.
Sample 1

Related to Rating Impact on Student Learning Growth

  • Multiple Measures of Student Learning Measures must include a combination of classroom, school and district assessments, student growth percentiles on state assessments, if state assessments are available, and student MEPA gain scores. This definition may be revised as required by regulations or agreement of the parties upon issuance of ESE guidance expected by July 2012.

  • State Approval of Replacement Personnel The Engineer may not replace the project manager or key personnel without prior consent of the State. The State must be satisfied that the new project manager or other key personnel is qualified to provide the authorized services. If the State determines that the new project manager or key personnel is not acceptable, the Engineer may not use that person in that capacity and shall replace him or her with one satisfactory to the State within forty-five (45) days.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

  • How Do I Get More Information? This Settlement Notice does not fully describe all of the claims, defenses, or contentions of the parties. If you have questions about this Notice or the Action, please do not contact the Court. If you have questions regarding the Settlement, you can call Class Counsel at 0-000-000-0000, email Class Counsel at xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx, call the Settlement Administrator at 0-000-000-0000, write to the Settlement Administrator at JPM Stable Value Fund Litigation c/o JND Class Action Administration, P.O. Box 91304, Seattle, WA 98111, or go to the following website: xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx where you will find the Court’s order certifying the Class, the Plaintiffs’ Consolidated and Amended Complaint, the Defendants’ Answer to the Consolidated and Amended Complaint, the Settlement Agreement, and information regarding the day, time, and location of the Fairness Hearing once it has been scheduled by the Court. Other filings with the Court and information regarding the Settlement are also available online. Dated: , 2017 BY THE ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ATTACHMENT 1 PLAN SPONSOR 1 1888 XXXXX, LLC 2 X.X. XXXXXXXX CO., INC. 3 ABILENE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 4 ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION 5 ACCE BENEFIT TRUST 6 ACCE BENEFITS TRUST 7 ACCE BENEFITS TRUST 401(K) PLAN 8 ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC. 9 AGGREKO, LLC 10 AJAX PAVING INDUSTRIES OF FLORIDA, INC. 11 AJAX PAVING INDUSTRIES, INC. 12 ALASKA TANKER COMPANY ATC 13 ALCON LABS 14 ALLERGAN INC 15 ALM MEDIA INC. 16 ANCHOR ACQUISITION, LLC 17 AMARILLO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 18 AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EXECUTIVES 19 AMERICAN CIVIL CONSTRUCTORS, INC. 20 AMERICAN LIGHTING ASSOCIATION 21 AMERICAN ROYAL ASSOCIATION 22 AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 23 ALLIANT ENERGY CORPORATE SERVICES, INC. 24 AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORP. (AEP) 25 XXXXXXXX CORP. 26 XXXXXX CORP. 27 ANGELO'S AGGREGATE MATERIALS, LTD. 28 XXXX TRUCKING L.L.C. 29 APAC PAPER & PACKAGING CORP. 30 ARBOR MANAGEMENT, INC. 31 ARCH CHEMICAL INC. 32 AREA ENERGY & ELECTRIC, INC. 33 ARGO GROUP US 34 ARIZONA CHEMICAL COMPANY PLAN SPONSOR 35 ARLINGTON METALS CORPORATION 36 ASPHALT PAVING, INC. 37 ASSOCIATED WHOLESALE GROCERS, INC. 38 ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. 39 ASTELLAS US LLC 40 ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES, INC 41 AUDIO AUTHORITY CORPORATION 42 AUGUSTA NEWSPRINT COMPANY 43 AVON PRODUCTS, INC. 44 X.X. XXXXXXXX / XXXXXXXX / UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION (UTC) 45 BADGERLAND SUPPLY. INC. 46 BAESMAN PRINTING CORPORATION 47 BANK OF COMMERCE & TRUST COMPANY 48 BATON ROUGE AREA CHAMBER PROFIT SHARING PLAN 49 XXXXXXX XXXXXX COMPANY LLC 50 XXXX TOYOTA CORP. 51 BEECHMONT PRESS, LLC 52 XXXX INC. 53 BELL CORP. 54 XXXXX COMPANY, INC. 55 BENESYS, INC. 56 XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX AND DAVIS APLC 57 BEST BUY 58 BIGSTON CORPORATION 59 BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION 60 BISON GEAR ENG. CORP 61 BOC XXXXXXX, INC. 62 BOISE CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU PROFIT 63 BOISE METRO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 64 BOSE CORP. 65 XXXXXX AND XXXXXX P.A. 66 XXXXXX & XXXXXXXX CORPORATION 67 XXXXX XXXXX COMPANY 68 BROOK FURNITURE RENTAL INC. 69 XXXXXXXXXX HOLDINGS, INC. 70 BROWN AND XXXXXXXX PLAN SPONSOR 71 BUCKEYE PIPE LINE SERVICES COMPANY 72 XXXX-O-MATIC CORPORATION 73 X.X. ENTERPRISES 74 CANBERRA OAK RIDGE, LLC 75 CARATRON INDUSTRIES, INC. 76 XXXXXXX INC. 77 CARL ZEISS VISION INC. 78 XXXX INDUSTRIES, INC. 79 XXXXXX MACHINERY CO. 80 CATERPILLAR INC. 81 CDM FEDERAL SERVICES, INC. 82 CELANESE (HOECHST CELANESE) 83 CENTRALIZED LABORATORY SERVICES INC 84 CERNER CORP. 85 CHATTANOOGA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 86 CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH IN NORTH AMERICA 87 CINCINNATI TOOL STEEL COMPANY 88 XX XXXXXX CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 89 CLARIAN HEALTH / INDIANA UNIV. HEALTH INC. 90 XXXXXX QUALITY COATINGS, INC. 91 CLEAR LAKE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 92 XXXX HARDWOOD INC. 93 XXXXXXX & XXXXXX PRODUCTS CO. 94 COLONIAL PIPELINE CO. 95 COMMODORE ADVANCE SCIENCES, INC. 96 COMSYS IT PARTNERS INC. 97 CONNING & COMPANY 98 COOK COMPOSITES & POLYMERS COMPANY 99 COOPERATIVE REGIONS OF ORGANIC PRODUCER POOLS COOPERATIVE, INC. 100 CROWN EQUIPMENT CORP. 101 CSK AUTO, INC. 102 CUMMINS INC. 103 XXXXXXX & XXXXXXXXX, INC. 104 DACO INCORPORATED 105 DAKOTA CLINIC / INNOVIS HEALTH 106 DALLAS REGIONAL CHAMBER PLAN SPONSOR 107 DASCO PRO INC. 108 DETROIT LEGAL NEWS COMPANY 109 XXXX XXXXXX INC. 110 DIRECT GENERAL CORPORATION 111 XXX X. XXXXXXX, INC. 112 XXXXXXX COMPANIES INC. 113 DOTT INDUSTRIES, INC. 114 DOWCO INC. 115 DURATEK FEDERAL SERVICES, INC. 116 X.X. XXXXXXX COMPANY 117 EAGLE-PICHER CORPORATION 118 XXXX XXXXX CO. INC. 119 EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE INC. 120 EET CORPORATION 121 XXX XXXXX 122 ELKAY MANUFACTURING COMPANY 123 ELMER'S PRODUCTS INC. 124 EMPIRE LEVEL MANUFACTURING CORP. 125 ENERCON ENGINEERING, INC. 126 ENERGY EAST CORP. 127 ENERGY NORTHWEST 128 XX XXXX GROUP, L.P. 129 ERICSSON INC. 130 XXXXX XXXXX GLOBAL INC. 131 E-S PLASTIC PRODUCTS INC. 132 FATHER XXXXXXXX'X BOYS' HOME 133 XXXXXXX COMPANIES, INC. 134 FERRO CORP. 135 XXXXXX & COMPANY, INCORPORATED 136 FITCH, INC. 137 FIVE STAR DISTRIBUTING, INC. 138 XXXXXXXXX & XXXX 139 FOREMOST FARMS USA 140 FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. 141 FLORIDA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 142 FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY 143 FLO-TORK, INC. PLAN SPONSOR 144 FOX CITIES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY 145 XXXXX X. XXXX COMPANY 146 FREEPORT MCMORAN / XXXXXX DODGE CORP. 147 XXXXXXX DENVER, INC. 148 GERLIN, INC. DBA CORE PIPE PRODUCTS, INC. 149 GENERAC 150 GENERAL XXXXX 151 XXX CONSULTANTS, LLC 152 GHP OPERATING COMPANY LLC (GLOBAL HOME PRODUCTS) 153 XXXXXXXX / PROCTER & XXXXXX 154 GLENMARK INDUSTRIES INC. 155 GPD, INC. 156 GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED 157 GREATER BINGHAMTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 000 XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX OF COMMERCE 159 GREATER XXXXXXX CHAMBER PARTNERSHIP 160 GREATER LOUISVILLE INC. 161 GREATER NEW HAVEN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 162 GREATER PROVIDENCE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 163 GREATER RALEIGH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 164 GREATER READING CHAMBER OF COMMERCE/INDUSTRY 165 GREATER SCRANTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 166 GREATER TAMPA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 167 GREATER TOPEKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 168 GREATER WACO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 169 GREATER WASHINGTON BOARD OF TRADE 170 GREEN DIAMOND RESOURCE COMPANY 171 GREEN THUMB LAWNSCAPING, INC. 172 GRINDMASTER CORPORATION 173 XXXXXXXXX LUMBER & SPPLY, INC. 174 GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 175 H&S TOOLS INC. 176 XXXXX & XXXXXXX INC 177 HAPAQ-XXXXX 178 XXXXXXX ROADS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 179 XXXXXX PUBLICATIONS, INC.

  • Performance Rating Describes the Educator’s performance on each performance standard and overall. There shall be four performance ratings: Exemplary: the Educator’s performance consistently and significantly exceeds the requirements of a standard or overall. The rating of exemplary on a standard indicates that practice significantly exceeds proficient. Proficient: the Educator’s performance fully and consistently meets the requirements of a standard or overall. Proficient practice is understood to be fully satisfactory.

  • Target Audience The target audience for this policy includes, but is not limited to, all faculty, trainees/students, and other members of MD Anderson’s workforce, including Facilities Management (FM) Project Managers, FM Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Staff, Contractors, and Stakeholders who request a Scheduled Utility Outage for: • New construction. • Renovation. • Maintenance.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.