Potential for Harm definition

Potential for Harm. Score”: 9

AI-Powered Contracts

Draft, Review & Redline at the Speed of AI

Potential for Harm. The scores of the three factors are added to provide a Potential for Harm score for each violation or group of violations. In this case, a final score of 7 was calculated. The total score is then used in Step 2, below.

Potential for Harm means the degree to which operator’s actions adversely affect the public health, safety and the environment. This potential is based on the number of tires for which that facility is permitted.

Examples of Potential for Harm in a sentence

When there is a discharge, the Central Valley Water Board is to determine an initial liability amount on a per gallon basis using the Potential for Harm score and the Extent of Deviation from Requirement of the violation.
Table 1 of the Enforcement Policy is used to determine a “per gallon factor” based on the Potential for Harm and Extent of Deviation.
The Enforcement Policy specifies that when there is a discharge, an initial liability amount based on a per-gallon and/or a per-day basis is determined using the sum of the Potential for Harm scores from Step 1 and a determination of Deviation from Requirement.
Moderate The Potential for Harm score is either Minor, Moderate, or Major.
The Per Day Factor utilizing a Moderate Potential for Harm and Major Deviation from Requirement is 0.55 (see Table 3 on page 16 of the 2017 Enforcement Policy).
When there is a discharge, the Central Valley Water Board is to determine an initial liability amount on a per day basis using the same Potential for Harm and the Extent of Deviation from Requirement that were used in the per-gallon analysis.
When there is a discharge, the Water Board is to determine the initial liability on a per day basis using the Potential for Harm score from Step 1 and the Extent of Deviation from Requirements.
Harm or Potential Harm to Beneficial Uses for Discharge Violations 1 2 Harm or Potential for Harm: minor For the 39 capacity-related SSOs, though there were impacts to the recreational beneficial uses of the respective creeks involved, the potential harm factor is minor because the discharges were diluted with high wet weather flows in the creek; and the actual recreational uses are typically less during wet weather.
The resulting per-gallon multiplier factor is 0.150 from the matrix in Table 1 of the Enforcement Policy, based the Potential for Harm score and extent of Deviation from Requirement described above.
Each Broker shall thereupon 26 independently make his or her determinations of the Fair Market Rental Value within twenty (20) days after the appointment of the second Broker.

More Definitions of Potential for Harm

Potential for Harm means the potential to cause an adverse impact. The potential for harm increases based on the cumulative effect of multiple factors. Potential for harm will be assessed based on information available at the time. The DNR will assess the following factors:

Potential for Harm. The potential for harm can be characterized as minor, moderate, or major depending on how much the circumstances of the violation posed a threat to beneficial uses and the potential for harm. The potential for harm is minor. At the time of the violation, the Discharger was categorized as a Tier 2 ranch.4 The 2012 Agricultural Order requires Tier 2 and 3 dischargers to report on management practices that they are implementing via the ACF. When the ACF is not completed on time, Central Coast Water Board staff is unable to timely evaluate the effect on water quality from agricultural waste discharges and is unable to timely evaluate progress towards compliance with the 2012 Agricultural Order. Since the ACF was submitted late, the violation temporarily inhibited the Central Coast Water Board’s ability to identify water quality risk resulting in a minor potential for harm. The potential for harm is minor. The Discharger grows broccoli, a high risk crop that has a high groundwater nitrate loading risk. For Dischargers with a high risk crop, the 2012 Agricultural Order requires completion of a TNA Report. When the TNA Report is not completed on time, Central Coast Water Board staff is unable to timely evaluate and prioritize areas with high nitrogen applications and potential loading to groundwater, assess the effect on groundwater quality from agricultural nitrogen loading, and evaluate progress towards compliance with the 2012 Agricultural Order. Since the 2014 TNA Report was submitted late, the violation temporarily inhibited the Central Coast Water Board’s ability to identify water quality risk resulting in a minor potential for harm. The potential for harm is moderate because the characteristics of the violation indicate a substantial potential for harm. As explained above, the TNA Report allows Central Coast Water Board staff to evaluate and prioritize areas with high nitrogen applications and potential loading to groundwater, assess the effect on groundwater quality from agricultural nitrogen loading, and evaluate progress towards compliance with the 2012 Agricultural Order. The Discharger was categorized as a Tier 3 ranch at the time of Violations 3-4. When the 2015 and 2016 TNA Reports were submitted late, they indicated that the discharge had high risk of loading nitrogen in groundwater. The Discharger’s failure to timely submit complete 2015 and 2016 TNA Reports inhibited the Central Coast Water Board’s ability to identify water quality risk resulting...

Potential for Harm. The Enforcement Policy requires determination of whether the characteristics of the violation resulted in a minor, moderate, or major potential for harm or threat to beneficial uses. In this case, the violation is the failure to install erosion control BMPs on disturbed soils in active areas of the Project during rain events.