Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Clause Samples

Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques. Questioning and discussion techniques are not effective, or the approach generally focuses on student recall with limited or no opportunity to assess student understanding and/or encourage high-level cognitive thinking. Questioning and discussion techniques provide the opportunity to assess most students understanding and/or encourage high-level cognitive thinking. Questioning and discussion techniques are of high quality with the purpose of assessing student understanding and encouraging high-level cognitive thinking. Classroom questioning and discussion techniques are designed to include all students. Questions draw students into discussion in a manner that elicits student reflection and challenges deeper student engagement. Teacher emphasizes high- level cognitive thinking. Components of Domain 3: Classroom Instruction The teacher engages students in learning and the instructional strategies used to help students gain better insight into the subject matter. Descriptors Requires Attention Developing Proficient Exemplary Little or no attempt is made to encourage students to participate in classroom activities. The teacher’s approach ignores many students in the class. Students are encouraged to participate in classroom activities. The teacher attempts to engage most students but with limited positive interactions. Most students are encouraged to participate in classroom activities. The teacher engages all students. Opportunities are designed to provide for all students to actively engage in all activities.
View SourceView Similar (8)
Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques. Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished Teacher’s questions are of low cognitive challenge, require single correct responses, and are asked in rapid succession. Interaction between teacher and students is predominantly recitation style, with the teacher mediating all questions and answers. A few students dominate the discussion. Teacher’s questions lead students through a single path of inquiry, with answers seemingly determined in advance. Alternatively, the teacher attempts to frame some questions designed to promote student thinking and understanding, but only a few students are involved. Teacher attempts to engage all students in the discussion and to encourage them to respond to one another, but with uneven results. Although the teacher may use some low-level questions, he or she asks the students questions designed to promote thinking and understanding. Teacher creates a genuine discussion among students, providing adequate time for students to respond and stepping aside when appropriate. Teacher successfully engages most students in the discussion, employing a range of strategies to ensure that most students are heard. Teacher uses a variety or series of questions or prompts to challenge students cognitively, advance high-level thinking and discourse, and promote metacognition. Students formulate many questions, initiate topics, and make unsolicited contributions. Students themselves ensure that all voices are heard in the discussion.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques. Questions are appropriate to the content and level of students’ understanding. Teacher encourages students to pose his or her own questions and is responsive to student questions. The teacher facilitates student-led discussions.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques. Teacher makes poor use of questioning and discussion techniques, with low-level questions, limited student participation, and little true discussion. Teacher’s use of questioning and discussion techniques is uneven, with some high-level questions, attempts at true discussion, and moderate student participation. Teacher’s use of questioning and discussion techniques reflects high-level questions, true discussion, and full participation by all students. Students formulate many of the high-level questions and assume responsibility for the participation of all students in the discussion. Students are not at all intellectually engaged in significant learning, as a result of inappropriate activities or materials, poor representations of content, or lack of lesson structure. Students are intellectually engaged only partially, resulting from activities or materials of uneven quality, inconsistent representations of content, or uneven structure or pacing. Students are intellectually engaged throughout the lesson, with appropriate activities and materials, instructive representations of content, and suitable structure and pacing of the lesson. Students are highly engaged throughout the lesson and make material contributions to the representation of content, the activities, and the materials. The structure and pacing of the lesson allow for student reflection and closure. Teacher’s feedback to students is of poor quality and is not given in a timely manner. Teacher adheres to the instruction plan in spite of evidence of poor student understanding or students’ lack of interest, and fails to respond to students’ questions; teacher assumes no responsibility for students’ failure to understand. Teacher’s feedback to students is uneven, and its timeliness is inconsistent. Teacher demonstrates moderate flexibility and responsiveness to students’ needs and interests during a lesson, and seeks to ensure the success of all students. Teacher’s feedback to students is timely and of consistently high quality. Teacher seeks ways to ensure successful learning for all students, making adjustments as needed to instruction plans and responding to student interests and questions. Teacher’s feedback to students is timely and of consistently high quality, and students make use of the feedback in their learning. Teacher is highly responsive to students’ interests and questions, making major lesson adjustments if necessary, and persists in ensuring the success of all students. 4a: Reflect...
View SourceView Similar (2)
Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques. Basic Proficient Distinguished Uses open-ended and closed questions. Attempts to engage all students in discussion. Uses a variety of questions, including higher order thinking, that actively engage students. Allows adequate time for student response. Models questioning techniques which are assimilated and used by students.
View Source
Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques. INEFFECTIVE
View Source
Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques. Unsatisfactory – 1 Basic – 2 Proficient – 3 Distinguished – 4 Teacher’s questions are of low cognitive challenge, re- quire single correct re- sponses, and are asked in rapid succession. Interaction between teacher and students is predominantly recitation style, with the teacher mediating all ques- tions and answers. A few students dominate the discussion. Teacher’s questions lead stu- dents through a single path of inquiry, with answers seem- ▇▇▇▇▇ determined in advance. Alternatively, the teacher at- tempts to frame some ques- tions designed to promote student thinking and under- standing, but only a few stu- dents are involved. Teacher attempts to engage all students in the discussion and to encourage them to respond to one another, but with une- ven results. Although the teacher may use some low-level ques- tions, he or she asks the stu- dents questions designed to promote thinking and under- standing. Teacher creates a genuine dis- cussion among students, providing adequate time for students to respond and step- ping aside when appropriate. Teacher successfully engages most students in the discus- sion, employing a range of strategies to ensure that most students are heard. Teacher uses a variety or se- ▇▇▇▇ of questions or prompts to challenge students cogni- tively, advance high-level thinking and discourse, and promote metacognition. Students formulate many questions, initiate topics, and make unsolicited contribu- tions. Students themselves ensure that all voices are heard in the discussion.
View Source

Related to Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques

  • UPDATING AND DISCLOSING FINANCIAL INFORMATION You will provide facts

  • Inventions and Discoveries (a) Upon execution of this Agreement and thereafter, Executive shall promptly and fully disclose to the Company, and with all necessary detail for a complete understanding of the same, all existing and future developments, know-how, discoveries, inventions, improvements, concepts, ideas, writings, formulae, processes and Methods (whether copyrightable, patentable or otherwise) made, received, conceived, acquired or written during working hours, or otherwise, by Executive (whether or not at the request or upon the suggestion of the Company) during the period of his employment with, or rendering of advisory or consulting services to, the Company or any of its subsidiaries and affiliates, solely or jointly with others, in or relating to any activities of the Company or its subsidiaries and affiliates known to him as a consequence of his employment or the rendering of advisory and consulting services hereunder (collectively the “Subject Matter”). (b) Executive hereby assigns and transfers, and agrees to assign and transfer, to the Company, all his rights, title and interest in and to the Subject Matter, and Executive further agrees to deliver to the Company any and all drawings, notes, specifications and data relating to the Subject Matter, and to execute, acknowledge and deliver all such further papers, including applications for copyrights or patents, as may be necessary to obtain copyrights and patents for any thereof in any and all countries and to vest title thereto to the Company. Executive shall assist the Company in obtaining such copyrights or patents during the term of this Agreement, and at any time thereafter on reasonable notice and at mutually convenient times, and Executive agrees to testify in any prosecution or litigation involving any of the Subject Matter; provided, however, that Executive shall be compensated in a timely manner at the rate of $250 per day (or portion thereof), plus out-of-pocket expenses incurred in rendering such assistance or giving or preparing to give such testimony if it is required after the termination of this Agreement.

  • Information Technology Accessibility Standards Any information technology related products or services purchased, used or maintained through this Grant must be compatible with the principles and goals contained in the Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards adopted by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board under Section 508 of the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. §794d), as amended. The federal Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards can be found at: ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/508.htm.

  • Suggestions and Feedback If you provide us with any suggestions, feedback or input (“Customer Input”) related to our Services, we (and our corporate group entities) will own all right, title and interest in and to the Customer Input, even if you have designated the Customer Input as confidential. We and our corporate group entities will be entitled to use the Customer Input without restriction. You assign to us all right, title and interest in and to the Customer Input and agree to provide us with any assistance we may require to document, perfect and maintain our rights in the Customer Input. For this purpose the word: “assign” is legal term which means legally transferring the benefit, such as you legally transferring the benefit of the Customer Input to us.

  • Information Technology The following applies to all contracts for information technology commodities and contractual services. “Information technology” is defined in section 287.012(15), F.S., to have the same meaning as provided in section 282.0041, F.S.