Student Performance Goals Sample Clauses

Student Performance Goals. The School agrees to make reasonable progress towards meeting academic standards as defined by the Colorado School Performance Framework and the CSI Annual Review of Schools (or its replacement). Reasonable progress will be established and measured through the implementation of annually agreed-upon academic targets, developed through use of the Unified Improvement Plan process. The School’s progress will be monitored and measured with the CSI Annual Review of Schools (or its replacement) and evaluated annually as set forth above. The School agrees that the terms “reasonable progress” or “adequate progress” are defined through this process and that the School will be held accountable pursuant to these definitions.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Student Performance Goals. The School agrees to make reasonable progress towards meeting State academic standards as defined by the Colorado School Performance Framework, as well as making reasonable progress toward meeting state standards across subgroups and subindicators. Reasonable progress will be established through the implementation of annually revisited and agreed-upon academic targets, developed through use of the Unified Improvement Plan process. The School’s progress will be monitored with the Institute performance calculator, and evaluated annually with the Institute dashboard. In addition to schoolwide targets, the School shall develop specific performance targets for identified areas of improvement. These include but are not limited to students eligible for free and reduced lunch, adequate progress in Math at the elementary and high school levels, as well as measures of postsecondary readiness. In the event that the School does not meet its annually agreed-upon targets, the School must work with the Institute utilizing the School’s interim assessment results to develop seasonal benchmark targets in addition to their UIP targets. Where applicable, student performance results on the state assessment shall surpass the geographic district in which the school is housed. Student performance results on the state assessment shall surpass results of comparable Colorado schools serving similar populations. Selection of the comparison group will be determined by the Institute, utilizing a set of standardized criteria to include size, grades served, and demographic characteristics. The School acknowledges that this comparison group may change over time to better reflect the changing demographic makeup of the school. The Institute agrees to provide the School with the opportunity for input into any proposed changes before they are finalized.
Sample 1

Related to Student Performance Goals

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out-

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Goals Goals define availability, performance and other objectives of Service provisioning and delivery. Goals do not include remedies and failure to meet any Service Goal does not entitle Customer to a Service credit.

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

  • Performance Metrics In the event Grantee fails to timely achieve the following performance metrics (the “Performance Metrics”), then in accordance with Section 8.4 below Grantee shall upon written demand by Triumph repay to Triumph all portions of Grant theretofore funded to and received by Grantee:

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

  • PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES 8 A. CONTRACTOR shall achieve performance objectives, tracking and reporting Performance 9 Outcome Objective statistics in monthly programmatic reports, as appropriate. ADMINISTRATOR 10 recognizes that alterations may be necessary to the following services to meet the objectives, and,

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.