Standard Drafting Team Review of Comments Sample Clauses

Standard Drafting Team Review of Comments. SERC staff shall forward all comments received to the RSS. The RSS shall review the comments received and revise the draft SERC Regional Reliability Standard as needed. The RSS shall develop a written response to each comment received using the Consideration of Comments Form Template (see Appendix F). The SERC Consideration of Comments Form Template can be downloaded from the SERC website (xxx.xxxx0.xxx). The completed Consideration of Comments Form will be posted on the SERC web site. The RSS shall summarize comments that were rejected by the RSS and the reason(s) that these comments were rejected, in part or whole. The RSS shall submit to the SC the summary of comments rejected, the completed Consideration of Comments form, and any resulting revisions to the draft SERC Regional Reliability Standard. If needed, a second draft of the SERC Regional Reliability Standard (along with the summary of comments rejected and the Consideration of Comments from the previous posting) will be posted for another comment period. Such comment period shall be for thirty (30) calendar days. A notice of the posting for comment will be sent to all SERC Standing Committees representatives and alternates. In addition, the notice will be sent (via e-mail) to NERC, the regional standards area of the other Regional Entities, individuals listed as entity contacts in the SERC Compliance Registry, and the SERC Registered Ballot Body representatives to seek input on the revised draft SERC Regional Reliability Standard. Based on comments received to the posting, Step 7 will be repeated as necessary until the RSS and the SC agree that no additional comments posting periods are warranted. The SERC Manager of Reliability Standards will then request the NERC regional standards staff to make arrangements for a formal quality review of the draft standard. The RSS will develop responses to any recommendations from that review, including developing revisions to the draft standard if appropriate. The SDT and SC must agree on those responses prior to taking one of the two following actions:  Submit the draft standard for an additional comment posting period (Step 7); or  Submit the draft standard to the SERC Ballot Body for approval (Step 9). The SC will determine if an additional NERC formal quality review will be requested for a draft standard which has been revised based on responses to an addition comments posting period.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Standard Drafting Team Review of Comments

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by AGREEMENT, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer.

  • Claims Review Methodology a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject to the Quarterly Claims Review.‌

  • Review of Personnel File Upon written authority from an employee, OC shall permit the President of the Union or their designate to review that employee's personnel file in the office in which the file is normally kept in order to facilitate the proper investigation of a grievance.

  • Joint Review JADRC may, at the request of either party, review issues arising from the application of this Article.

  • Review of Submittals A/E and ODR review is only for conformance with the design concept and the information provided in the Contract Documents. Responses to submittals will be in writing. The approval of a separate item does not indicate approval of an assembly in which the item functions. The approval of a submittal does not relieve the Contractor of responsibility for any deviation from the requirements of the Contract unless the Contractor informs the A/E and ODR of such deviation in a clear, conspicuous, and written manner on the submittal transmittal and at the time of submission, and obtains the A/E’s and Owner’s written specific approval of the particular deviation.

  • Claims Review Findings a. Narrative Results.‌‌

  • HUB Subcontracting Plan The Owner has adopted Exhibit H, Policy on Utilization of Historically Underutilized Business ("Policy"), which is incorporated herein by reference. Contractor, as a provision of the Agreement must comply with the requirements of the Policy and adhere to the HUB Subcontracting Plan submitted with Contractor's Proposal and attached as Exhibit I. No changes to the HUB Subcontracting Plan can be made by the Contractor without the prior written approval of the Owner in accordance with the Policy.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.