Reporting & Measures for Evaluating Performance Sample Clauses

Reporting & Measures for Evaluating Performance. For this Agreement, MassDEP will continue to produce regular (at least annual) status reports for the elements outlined in the Priorities and Commitment Lists covering this time period and status reports for identified Areas for Collaboration. MassDEP and EPA agree to meet as needed to discuss progress and address any areas of concern. MassDEP staff will continue to produce and submit annual work plan progress reports to EPA Region 1. MassDEP will continue to improve its reporting mechanisms, focusing on developing a jointly agreed upon set of environmental and programmatic measures, which will help xxxxxx discussions on how MassDEP and EPA Region 1 are meeting their strategic objectives and achieving measurable environmental results. MassDEP’s annual assessments will strive to summarize results, track progress on identified P&C List commitments and Areas for Collaboration, identifying areas where progress met or exceeded expectations and where the agency may have had difficulty in achieving anticipated progress on deliverables or where MassDEP may fall behind on specific strategic objectives. MassDEP and EPA will work cooperatively to improve the annual assessment progress by including specific indicators of air and water quality, as well as land resources management, in terms of outputs and outcomes.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Reporting & Measures for Evaluating Performance. For this Agreement, the Department will continue to produce regular (at least annual) status reports for the elements outlined in the P&C Lists, and status reports for identified Areas for Collaboration. NHDES and XXXXX agree to meet as needed to discuss progress and address any areas of concern. NHDES staff will continue to produce progress reports through the MTRS database, and will make these available to EPANE. NHDES will also utilize its web-based Environmental Dashboard to record environmental changes - See xxxx://xxx0.xxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/NHEnvironmentalDashboard/. NHDES annual assessments (also known as “End-of-Year” Progress Reports) will strive to summarize results, track progress on identified P&C List Commitments, and Areas for Collaboration, identify areas where progress met or exceeded expectations, as well as areas where there may have been difficulty in achieving projected outcomes. NHDES and EPANE agree to develop (and to continuously improve) a process for jointly evaluating and reporting progress and accomplishments that comply with 40 CFR Part 31.115.
Sample 1Sample 2
Reporting & Measures for Evaluating Performance. For this Agreement, the Department of Environmental Conservation (VT DEC) will continue to produce regular (at least annual) status reports for the elements outlined in the P&C Lists, and status reports for identified Areas for Collaboration. VT DEC and EPANE agree to meet as needed to discuss progress and address any areas of concern. VT DEC’s annual assessments (also known as “End-of-Year” Progress Reports) are expected to summarize results, track progress on identified P&C List Commitments and Areas for Collaboration, identify areas where progress met or exceeded expectations, as well as areas where there may have been difficulty in achieving projected outcomes. This report is submitted by December 31st for the period ending September 30th of the prior federal fiscal year. This reporting is intended to meet the requirements under 40 CFR §35 of a joint evaluation process for state grants, including Performance Partnership Grants (PPGs) including:
Sample 1
Reporting & Measures for Evaluating Performance. For this Agreement, the Department will continue to produce regular (at least annual) status reports for the elements outlined in the P&C Lists, and status reports for identified Areas for Collaboration. MEDEP and EPA agree to meet as needed to discuss progress and address any areas of concern. MEDEP staff will continue to produce progress reports, and will make these available, to EPA bi-annually. MEDEP annual assessments (also known as “End-of-Year” Progress Reports) will strive to summarize results, track progress on identified P&C List Commitments, and Areas for Collaboration, identify areas where progress met or exceeded expectations, as well as areas where there may have been difficulty in achieving projected outcomes. MEDEP will continue normal reporting of data to national databases such as PCS-ICIS, as well as required program reporting such as 305(b) and enforcement related actions. MEDEP and EPA agree to develop (and to continuously improve) a process for jointly evaluating and reporting progress and accomplishments that comply with 40 CFR Part 31.115.
Sample 1
Reporting & Measures for Evaluating Performance. For this Agreement, the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (VTDEC) will continue to produce regular (at least annual) status reports for the elements outlined in the P&C Lists, and status reports for identified Areas for Collaboration. VTDEC and EPA Region 1 agree to meet as needed to discuss progress and address any areas of concern. VTDEC annual assessments (also known as “End-of-Year” Progress Reports) will strive to summarize results, track progress on identified P&C List Commitments, and Areas for Collaboration, identify areas where progress met or exceeded expectations, as well as areas where there may have been difficulty in achieving projected outcomes. VTDEC and EPA Region 1 agree to develop (and to continuously improve) a process for jointly evaluating and reporting progress and accomplishments that comply with 40 CFR Part 31.115.
Sample 1
Reporting & Measures for Evaluating Performance. For this Agreement, MassDEP will continue to produce regular (at least annual) status reports for the elements outlined in the Priorities and Commitment Lists covering this time period. MassDEP and EPA agree to meet as needed to discuss progress and address any areas of concern. MassDEP staff will continue to produce and submit annual work plan progress reports to EPA New England. MassDEP will continue to improve its reporting mechanisms, focusing on developing a jointly agreed upon set of environmental and programmatic measures, which will help xxxxxx discussions on how MassDEP and EPA New England are meeting their strategic objectives and achieving measurable environmental results. MassDEP’s annual assessments will strive to summarize results, track progress on identified P&C List commitments, identifying areas where progress met or exceeded expectations and where the agency may have had difficulty in achieving anticipated progress on deliverables or where the MassDEP may fall behind on specific strategic objectives. MassDEP and EPA will work cooperatively to improve the annual assessment progress by including specific indicators of air and water quality, as well as land resources management in terms of outputs and outcomes.
Sample 1

Related to Reporting & Measures for Evaluating Performance

  • EVALUATING PERFORMANCE 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out -

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference. Adherence to these accessible technology standards is one way to ensure compliance with the College’s underlying legal obligations to ensure that people with disabilities are able to acquire the same information, engage in the same interactions, and enjoy the same benefits and services within the same timeframe as their nondisabled peers, with substantially equivalent ease of use; that they are not excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in any College programs, services, and activities delivered online, as required by Section 504 and the ADA and their implementing regulations; and that they receive effective communication of the College’s programs, services, and activities delivered online.

  • Covenants of Performance Measurement No interference. Registry Operator shall not interfere with measurement Probes, including any form of preferential treatment of the requests for the monitored services. Registry Operator shall respond to the measurement tests described in this Specification as it would to any other request from an Internet user (for DNS and RDDS) or registrar (for EPP). ICANN testing registrar. Registry Operator agrees that ICANN will have a testing registrar used for purposes of measuring the SLRs described above. Registry Operator agrees to not provide any differentiated treatment for the testing registrar other than no billing of the transactions. ICANN shall not use the registrar for registering domain names (or other registry objects) for itself or others, except for the purposes of verifying contractual compliance with the conditions described in this Agreement. PUBLIC INTEREST COMMITMENTS Registry Operator will use only ICANN accredited registrars that are party to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement approved by the ICANN Board of Directors on 27 June 2013 in registering domain names. A list of such registrars shall be maintained by ICANN on ICANN’s website. (Intentionally omitted. Registry Operator has not included commitments, statements of intent or business plans provided for in its application to ICANN for the TLD.) Registry Operator agrees to perform the following specific public interest commitments, which commitments shall be enforceable by ICANN and through the Public Interest Commitment Dispute Resolution Process established by ICANN (posted at xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/en/resources/registries/picdrp), which may be revised in immaterial respects by ICANN from time to time (the “PICDRP”). Registry Operator shall comply with the PICDRP. Registry Operator agrees to implement and adhere to any remedies ICANN imposes (which may include any reasonable remedy, including for the avoidance of doubt, the termination of the Registry Agreement pursuant to Section 4.3(e) of the Agreement) following a determination by any PICDRP panel and to be bound by any such determination. Registry Operator will include a provision in its Registry-Registrar Agreement that requires Registrars to include in their Registration Agreements a provision prohibiting Registered Name Holders from distributing malware, abusively operating botnets, phishing, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement, fraudulent or deceptive practices, counterfeiting or otherwise engaging in activity contrary to applicable law, and providing (consistent with applicable law and any related procedures) consequences for such activities including suspension of the domain name. Registry Operator will periodically conduct a technical analysis to assess whether domains in the TLD are being used to perpetrate security threats, such as pharming, phishing, malware, and botnets. Registry Operator will maintain statistical reports on the number of security threats identified and the actions taken as a result of the periodic security checks. Registry Operator will maintain these reports for the term of the Agreement unless a shorter period is required by law or approved by ICANN, and will provide them to ICANN upon request. Registry Operator will operate the TLD in a transparent manner consistent with general principles of openness and non-discrimination by establishing, publishing and adhering to clear registration policies.

  • Performance Evaluations 34.1. The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • Contractor Performance Evaluations The Contract Administrator will evaluate Contractor’s performance as often as the Contract Administrator deems necessary throughout the term of the contract. This evaluation will be based on criteria including the quality of goods or services, the timeliness of performance, and adherence to applicable laws, including prevailing wage and living wage. City will provide Contractors who receive an unsatisfactory rating with a copy of the evaluation and an opportunity to respond. City may consider final evaluations, including Contractor’s response, in evaluating future proposals and bids for contract award.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • SCHEDULE FOR PERFORMANCE REVIEWS 8.1 The performance of each Employee in relation to his/her performance agreement shall be reviewed on the following dates with the understanding that reviews in the first and third quarter may be verbal if performance is satisfactory:

  • Employee Performance Evaluations Any employee performance evaluation shall be prepared by the employee's supervisor who has the responsibility and authority to prepare such reports. Employee performance evaluation reports shall be discussed with the employee prior to finalization of each category of the report. An employee will receive an appointment with his/her department's reviewing officer to discuss the evaluation by signing the evaluation form in the space provided. Each department shall make a reasonable effort to ensure that the reviewing officer for this purpose has not been a party to the preparation of the evaluation. In no case shall the reviewing officer sign the evaluation form until a review has occurred. Any regular or special evaluation with a rating of "unsatisfactory" shall include plans for employee development. Except in cases of termination, release from probation, or leave of absence, employees who receive an unsatisfactory performance evaluation must receive a follow-up evaluation. The follow-up evaluation shall cover a period of time no greater than ninety (90) calendar days from the date of the final review of the initial unsatisfactory evaluation. An employee shall have the right to submit written comments regarding any evaluation and to have such comments included in his/her personnel file along with the evaluation.

  • Metrics The DISTRICT and PARTNER will partake in monthly coordination meetings at mutually agreed upon times and dates to discuss the progress of the program Scope of Work. DISTRICT and PARTNER will also mutually establish criteria and process for ongoing program assessment/evaluation such as, but not limited to the DISTRICT’s assessment metrics and other state metrics [(Measures of Academic Progress – English, SBAC – 11th grade, Redesignation Rates, mutually developed rubric score/s, student attendance, and Social Emotional Learning (SEL) data)]. The DISTRICT and PARTNER will also engage in annual review of program content to ensure standards alignment that comply with DISTRICT approved coursework. The PARTNER will provide their impact data based upon these metrics.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.