Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates Operating Protocols Clause Samples

The Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates Operating Protocols clause establishes a framework for two or more parties to coordinate the management and operation of shared flowgates—critical points in an electrical grid where power flow is monitored and controlled. In practice, this clause requires each party to share relevant operational data, adhere to mutually agreed procedures, and communicate about planned or unplanned events that may impact flowgate capacity or reliability. By formalizing these coordination efforts, the clause helps prevent congestion, ensures system reliability, and minimizes disputes by clarifying each party’s responsibilities in managing shared grid infrastructure.
Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates Operating Protocols. In order to coordinate congestion management proactively, each Party agrees to respect the other Party’s determinations of AFC and calculations of firmness for real-time operations applicable to the Party’s Coordinated Flowgates. Additionally, each Party agrees to respect the allocations defined by the allocation process set forth in the Congestion Management Process. The Parties will establish and finalize the process and timing for exchanging their respective AFC calculations and Firm Flow calculations/allocations with respect to all RCFs. The Parties’ capabilities and real time actions shall be governed by and in accordance with the Congestion Management Process. Southwest Power Pool - Rate Schedules and Seams Agreements Tariff - MISO-SPP Joint Operating Agreement - Rate Schedule 9 Article VI - Rate Schedule 9 Section 6.2
View SourceView Similar (17)
Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates Operating Protocols. In order to coordinate congestion management proactively, each Party agrees to respect the other Party’s determinations of AFC and calculations of firmness for real-time operations applicable to the Party’s Coordinated Flowgates. Additionally, each Party agrees to respect the allocations defined by the allocation process set forth in the Congestion Management Process. The Parties will establish and finalize the process and timing for exchanging their respective AFC calculations and Firm Flow calculations/allocations with respect to all RCFs. The Parties’ capabilities and real time actions shall be governed by and in accordance with the Congestion Management Process.
View SourceView Similar (5)
Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates Operating Protocols. Phase 2, Market to Non-Market. As used in this Article and the Congestion Management Process:
View Source
Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates Operating Protocols 
View Source

Related to Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates Operating Protocols

  • Project Management and Coordination The Engineer shall coordinate all subconsultant activity to include quality of and consistency of work and administration of the invoices and monthly progress reports. The Engineer shall coordinate with necessary local entities.

  • Standard Operating Procedures Over approximately the past eight years, the Parties have been supplying select Products to one another for use in the operation of their respective businesses within the United States of America, Canada and Mexico. The Parties developed and been following certain standard operating procedures in connecting with, among other topics, forecasting, production planning, ordering, delivering and resolving claims on the Products supplied to one another (the “Current SOPs”). The Parties will be updating their respective business systems over the next six months, and the updates to these business systems will require the Parties to modify the Current SOPs. Once the Parties have completed the updates to the business systems and agreed on the necessary modifications to the Current SOPs, the Parties will sign a written amendment to this Agreement appending the updated standard operating procedures (the “Updated SOPs”). Until the Parties have signed a written amendment appending the Updated SOPs, the parties will continue to follow the Current SOPs. The Parties will comply with the applicable SOPs in connection with the purchase and sale of products identified in a Purchase Schedule. The Parties may add terms and conditions to, and amend the terms and conditions of, the SOP in a Purchase Schedule, but any additional and amended terms and conditions in a Purchase Schedule supplementing and modifying the SOP will only apply the specific products identified in that Purchase Schedule for its duration.

  • Coordination, Oversight and Monitoring of Service Providers As set forth in the Administrative Services Agreement between the Fund and CRMC, CRMC shall coordinate, monitor and oversee the activities performed by the Service Providers with which AFS contracts. AFS shall monitor Service Providers’ provision of services including the delivery of Customer account statements and all Fund-related material, including summary prospectuses and/or prospectuses, shareholder reports, and proxies.

  • Contractor’s Project Manager and Key Personnel Contractor shall appoint a Project Manager to direct the Contractor’s efforts in fulfilling Contractor’s obligations under this Contract. This Project Manager shall be subject to approval by the County and shall not be changed without the written consent of the County’s Project Manager, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. The Contractor’s Project Manager shall be assigned to this project for the duration of the Contract and shall diligently pursue all work and services to meet the project time lines. The County’s Project Manager shall have the right to require the removal and replacement of the Contractor’s Project Manager from providing services to the County under this Contract. The County’s Project manager shall notify the Contractor in writing of such action. The Contractor shall accomplish the removal within five (5) business days after written notice by the County’s Project Manager. The County’s Project Manager shall review and approve the appointment of the replacement for the Contractor’s Project Manager. The County is not required to provide any additional information, reason or rationale in the event it The County is not required to provide any additional information, reason or rationale in the event it requires the removal of Contractor’s Project Manager from providing further services under the Contract.

  • Dissemination of Research Findings and Acknowledgement of Controlled-Access Datasets Subject to the NIH GDS Policy