Rating of Overall Educator Performance. The Educator’s overall performance rating is based on the Evaluator’s professional judgment and examination of evidence of the Educator’s performance against the four Performance Standards and the Educator’s attainment of goals set forth in the Educator Plan, as follows:
Rating of Overall Educator Performance. The Educator's overall performance rating is based on the Evaluator's professional judgment formed by the examination of evidence of the Educator's performance against the four Performance Standards and the Educator's attainment of goals set forth in the Educator Plan, as follows: • Standard I: Curriculum, Planning, and Assessment • Standard II: Teaching All Students • Standard III: Family and Community Engagement • Standard IV: Professional Culture • Attainment of Professional Practice Goal(s) • Attainment of Student Learning Goal(s) AA. *Rubric: A scoring tool that describes characteristics of practice or artifacts at different levels of performance. The rubric for Standards and Indicators of Effective Teaching Practice are used to rate Educators on Performance Standards. • Standards: Describes broad categories of professional practice, including those required in 603 CMR 35.03 • Indicators: Describes aspects of each standard, including those required in 603 CMR 35.03 • Elements: Defines the individual components under each indicator • Descriptors: Describes practice at four levels of performance for each element BB. *Summative Evaluation: An evaluation used to arrive at a rating on each standard, an overall rating, and as a basis to make personnel decisions. The summative evaluation includes the Evaluator's judgments of the Educator's performance against Performance Standards and the Educator's attainment of goals set forth in the Educator's Plan.
Rating of Overall Educator Performance. The Administrator’s overall performance rating is based on the Evaluator’s professional judgment and examination of evidence of the Administrator’s performance against the four Performance Standards and the Administrator’s attainment of goals set forth in the Educator Plan, as follows:
Rating of Overall Educator Performance. The Educator’s overall performance rating is based on the Evaluator’s professional judgment and examination of evidence of the Educator’s performance against the four Performance Standards and the Educator’s attainment of goals set forth in the Educator Plan, as follows: Standard 1: Curriculum, Planning and Assessment Standard 2: Teaching All Students Standard 3: Family and Community Engagement Standard 4: Professional Culture Attainment of Professional Practice Goal(s) Attainment of Student Learning Goal(s) Rubric: A scoring tool that describes characteristics of practice or artifacts at different levels of performance. The rubrics for Standards and Indicators of Effective Teaching Practice are used to rate Educators on Performance Standards, these rubrics consists of: Standards: Describes broad categories of professional practice, including those required in 603 CMR 35.03 Indicators: Describes aspects of each standard, including those required in 603 CMR 35.03
Rating of Overall Educator Performance. The Educator’s overall performance rating is based on the Evaluator’s professional judgment and examination of evidence of the Educator’s performance against the four Performance Standards and the Educator’s attainment of goals set forth in the Educator Plan, as follows: Standard 1: Curriculum, Planning and Assessment Standard 2: Teaching All Students Standard 3: Family and Community Engagement Standard 4: Professional Culture Attainment of Professional Practice Goal(s) Attainment of Student Learning Goal(s) Rubric: In rating educators on Performance Standards for the purpose of formative assessments, formative evaluations, or summative evaluations, a rubric must be used. The rubric is a scoring tool used to judge the educator’s practice at the four levels of performance. The rubric consists of: • Standards and Indicators of Effective Teaching Practice: Defined in 603.CMR 35.03. These standards and indicators are used in the rubrics incorporated into this evaluation system. • Descriptors: define the individual elements of each of the indicators under the standards. • Benchmarks: describe the acceptable demonstration of knowledge, skill or behavior necessary to achieve that performance rating. For each indicator, there are four benchmarks – one describing performance at each performance rating – Exemplary, Proficient, Needs Improvement and Unsatisfactory. Self-Assessment: The evaluation cycle shall include self-assessment addressing Performance Standards. The educator shall provide such information, in the form of self-assessment, by October 1st (except for the first year when the deadline is November 1st) to the evaluator at the point of goal setting and plan development. Evaluators shall use evidence of educator performance and impact on student learning, growth and achievement to set the goal with the educator, based on the educator’s self-assessment and other sources that the evaluator shares with the educator. Summative Evaluation: An evaluation used to arrive at a rating on each standard, an overall rating, and as a basis to make personnel decisions. The summative evaluation includes the Evaluator’s professional judgements of the Educator’s performance against Performance Standards and the Educator’s attainment of goals set forth in the Educator’s Plan. The summative evaluation rating must be based on evidence from multiple categories of evidence. MCAS growth scores cannot be the sole basis for a summative evaluation rating. To be rated Proficient ove...
Rating of Overall Educator Performance. All parties agree that this will not include the attainment of professional practice goal(s) nor the attainment of student learning goal(s).
