PRIOR ART; REVIEW AND COMMENT Sample Clauses

PRIOR ART; REVIEW AND COMMENT. Agritope and Sunseeds shall each cooperate with the other to ensure that all prior art that is pertinent to the examination of a Joint Patent is brought to the attention of the other party. Each of the parties shall have the right to review and comment on substantive documents prepared in connection with the preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of the Joint Patents prior to the filing of such papers; however, such review and comment shall be performed expeditiously so as not to negatively affect patent rights.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PRIOR ART; REVIEW AND COMMENT. Each party shall cooperate with the other to ensure that all prior art that is pertinent to the examination of a patent or application relating to a Joint Invention or an invention covered by Section 8.3(d) hereof is brought to the attention of the other party. The parties to this Agreement shall have the right to review and comment on substantive documents prepared in connection with the preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of patents and applications relating to a Joint Invention or an invention covered by Section 8.3(d) hereof prior to the filing of such papers; however, such review and comment shall be performed expeditiously so as not to negatively affect patent rights.
PRIOR ART; REVIEW AND COMMENT. Each party shall .cooperate with the other to ensure that all prior art that is pertinent to the examination of a Joint Patent is brought to the attention of the other party. The parties to this Agreement shall have the right to review and comment on substantive documents prepared in connection with the preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of the Joint Patents prior to the filing of such papers; however, such review and comment shall be performed expeditiously so as not to negatively affect patent rights.
PRIOR ART; REVIEW AND COMMENT. Each Party shall cooperate with the other to ensure that all prior art that is pertinent to the examination of any Patent on UroGen Intellectual Property is brought to the attention of the other Party. The Parties to this Agreement shall have the right to review and comment on substantive documents prepared in connection with the preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of any Patent on UroGen Intellectual Property prior to the filing of such papers; however, such review and comment shall be performed expeditiously so as not to negatively affect patent rights and shall be at each party's own cost and expense.

Related to PRIOR ART; REVIEW AND COMMENT

  • Document Review The Company and the Executive hereby acknowledge and agree that each (i) has read this Agreement in its entirety prior to executing it, (ii) understands the provisions and effects of this Agreement, (iii) has consulted with such attorneys, accountants and financial and other advisors as it or he has deemed appropriate in connection with their respective execution of this Agreement, and (iv) has executed this Agreement voluntarily and knowingly.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by AGREEMENT, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer.

  • Claims Submission We will submit your claims and assist you in any way we reasonably can to help get your claims paid. Your insurance company may need you to supply certain information directly. It is your responsibility to comply with their request. Please be aware that the balance of your claim is your responsibility whether or not your insurance company pays your claim. Your insurance benefit is a contract between you and your insurance company; we are not party to that contract.

  • Review and Consultation Employee acknowledges and agrees he (a) has read this Agreement in its entirety prior to executing it, (b) understands the provisions and effects of this Agreement and (c) has consulted with such attorneys, accountants and financial or other advisors as he has deemed appropriate in connection with the execution of this Agreement. Employee understands, acknowledges and agrees that he has not received any advice, counsel or recommendation with respect to this Agreement from Employer’s attorneys. [Signature Page Follows]

  • Review and Appeal (a) Each Party shall establish or maintain judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative tribunals or procedures for the purpose of the prompt review and, where warranted, correction of final administrative actions regarding matters covered by this Treaty. Such tribunals shall be impartial and independent of the office or authority entrusted with administrative enforcement and shall not have any substantial interest in the outcome of the matter.

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.